Adoption intentions of electronic procurement among public sector organisations (PSOs) in Ghana: emerging economy perspective

IF 1.6 Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
D. Ofori, Osman Light, Joseph Ankomah
{"title":"Adoption intentions of electronic procurement among public sector organisations (PSOs) in Ghana: emerging economy perspective","authors":"D. Ofori, Osman Light, Joseph Ankomah","doi":"10.1108/jopp-09-2022-0045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nElectronic government procurement is an important platform that promotes efficient, transparent, competitive and agile delivery of procurement activities in public sector organisations. Implementing units who play a major role exhibits different attitude towards new technology. The purpose of this paper is to assess if there is any significant difference between optimistic and discomfort implementing units in relation to the implementation and intention to use the Ghana Electronic Procurement System (GHANEPS).\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nTechnology Readiness, Technology Acceptance and Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology and Diffusion Innovation Theory constituted the theoretical foundation. Guided by a cross sectional survey design, quantitative data from a sample of 181 procurement officers was collected using structured questionnaires. The hypothesised relationships were analysed using partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM).\n\n\nFindings\nAlthough there were some observable differences, the bootstrap results show that the difference was not significant, implying that these two groups do not differ much about the GHANEPS introduction and implementation. This is justifiable in the case of Ghana because public policies are made by top officials, and those in the grassroot or implementation domain have no choice but to act accordingly.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis study focused on metropolitan, municipal, district assemblies, public hospitals, tertiary institutions and senior high schools.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe study contributes to the critical antecedents for electronic procurement implementation and public sector management literature. It provides public institutions and practitioners with empirical evidence on how beliefs and perceptions of implementing units about electronic public procurement has some influence on attitude towards usage and intention to use. Positive attitudes and perceptions of the public procurement officers can be reinforced through adequate training and awareness creation.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThis study outcomes can serve as philosophical underpinnings for societal development.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study used a multi-group analysis to examine if there is any significant difference between these two categories of implementing units (optimistic group and discomfort group) in relation to facilitating conditions, personal innovativeness, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and ultimately to attitude and intention to use GHANEPS.\n","PeriodicalId":45136,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Procurement","volume":"12 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Procurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jopp-09-2022-0045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose Electronic government procurement is an important platform that promotes efficient, transparent, competitive and agile delivery of procurement activities in public sector organisations. Implementing units who play a major role exhibits different attitude towards new technology. The purpose of this paper is to assess if there is any significant difference between optimistic and discomfort implementing units in relation to the implementation and intention to use the Ghana Electronic Procurement System (GHANEPS). Design/methodology/approach Technology Readiness, Technology Acceptance and Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology and Diffusion Innovation Theory constituted the theoretical foundation. Guided by a cross sectional survey design, quantitative data from a sample of 181 procurement officers was collected using structured questionnaires. The hypothesised relationships were analysed using partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM). Findings Although there were some observable differences, the bootstrap results show that the difference was not significant, implying that these two groups do not differ much about the GHANEPS introduction and implementation. This is justifiable in the case of Ghana because public policies are made by top officials, and those in the grassroot or implementation domain have no choice but to act accordingly. Research limitations/implications This study focused on metropolitan, municipal, district assemblies, public hospitals, tertiary institutions and senior high schools. Practical implications The study contributes to the critical antecedents for electronic procurement implementation and public sector management literature. It provides public institutions and practitioners with empirical evidence on how beliefs and perceptions of implementing units about electronic public procurement has some influence on attitude towards usage and intention to use. Positive attitudes and perceptions of the public procurement officers can be reinforced through adequate training and awareness creation. Social implications This study outcomes can serve as philosophical underpinnings for societal development. Originality/value This study used a multi-group analysis to examine if there is any significant difference between these two categories of implementing units (optimistic group and discomfort group) in relation to facilitating conditions, personal innovativeness, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and ultimately to attitude and intention to use GHANEPS.
加纳公共部门组织采用电子采购的意图:新兴经济视角
目的电子政府采购是一个重要的平台,可促进公营机构进行有效率、透明、具竞争力和灵活的采购活动。发挥主要作用的实施单位对新技术表现出不同的态度。本文的目的是评估在使用加纳电子采购系统(GHANEPS)的实施和意图方面,乐观和不满意的实施单位之间是否存在任何显著差异。设计/方法/途径技术准备、技术接受、技术接受与使用统一理论和扩散创新理论构成了理论基础。在横断面调查设计的指导下,使用结构化问卷收集了181名采购干事样本的定量数据。使用偏最小二乘结构方程模型(PLS-SEM)分析了假设的关系。虽然存在一些可观察到的差异,但bootstrap结果显示差异并不显著,这意味着两组在GHANEPS的引入和实施方面差异不大。在加纳的情况下,这是合理的,因为公共政策是由高层官员制定的,而那些在基层或执行领域的人别无选择,只能采取相应的行动。研究局限/启示本研究主要针对都市、市、区议会、公立医院、大专院校和高中。本研究为电子采购的实施和公共部门管理文献提供了重要的前提。它为公共机构和从业人员提供了经验证据,说明实施单位对电子公共采购的信念和看法如何对使用态度和使用意图产生某种影响。可以通过适当的培训和提高认识来加强公共采购干事的积极态度和看法。社会意义这项研究的结果可以作为社会发展的哲学基础。原创性/价值本研究采用多组分析来检验这两类实施单位(乐观组和不适组)在促进条件、个人创新、感知有用性、感知易用性以及最终使用GHANEPS的态度和意图方面是否存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Public Procurement
Journal of Public Procurement PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Procurement (JOPP) seeks to further the understanding of public procurement. JOPP publishes original, high-quality research that explores the theories and practices of public procurement. The journal ensures that high-quality research is collected and disseminated widely to both academics and practitioners, and provides a forum for debate. It covers all subjects relating to the purchase of goods, services and works by public organizations at a local, regional, national and international level. JOPP is multi-disciplinary, with a broad approach towards methods and styles of research as well as the level of issues addressed. The Journal welcomes the submission of papers from researchers internationally. The journal welcomes research papers, narrative essays, exemplar cases, forums, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信