Development and Validation of a New Substance Use Disorder Screening Test Based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5)

Q4 Medicine
S. Saengduenchai, S. Nilaban, Tanya Singtho, A. Ranuwattananon, R. Kalayasiri
{"title":"Development and Validation of a New Substance Use Disorder Screening Test Based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5)","authors":"S. Saengduenchai, S. Nilaban, Tanya Singtho, A. Ranuwattananon, R. Kalayasiri","doi":"10.31584/jhsmr.2023932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The lack of a screening tool for substance use disorders is a significant problem for health care workers for patient care and referral. This study aimed to develop a Substance Use Disorder Screening Test (SUDST) to enable accurate classification of the severity of substance use disorders based on the Fifth Edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), that can be used by health professionals in all settings for basic screening for individuals at risk of substance use disorder. Material and Methods: Following close study of the DSM-5, 11 questions were developed, which were then tested on 207 participants who were receiving treatment for the use of methamphetamines. The participants were interviewed with the SUDST, the Ministry of Public Health Version 2 (normally ‘V.2’) screening test for risk of substance use, and were clinically diagnosed by their attending psychiatrist. Results: The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for SUDST was 0.79. The scores obtained from the SUDST were in high agreement with the V.2 and clinical diagnosis (p-value<0.001). Factor analysis showed three components of substance use disorder: 1) preoccupation and loss of control, 2) risky/harmful use, and 3) biopsychosocial aspects. Of the total possible score of 11, the cut-off points for identifying severe, moderate, and mild levels of risk were ≥7, 5-6, and 3-4, respectively, with sensitivity=72.7%-96.5% and specificity=61.9%-88.7%. Conclusion: The SUDST had high reliability and validity and could be used to detect patients at risk of substance use disorders.","PeriodicalId":36211,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4445","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31584/jhsmr.2023932","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4445

Abstract

Objective: The lack of a screening tool for substance use disorders is a significant problem for health care workers for patient care and referral. This study aimed to develop a Substance Use Disorder Screening Test (SUDST) to enable accurate classification of the severity of substance use disorders based on the Fifth Edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), that can be used by health professionals in all settings for basic screening for individuals at risk of substance use disorder. Material and Methods: Following close study of the DSM-5, 11 questions were developed, which were then tested on 207 participants who were receiving treatment for the use of methamphetamines. The participants were interviewed with the SUDST, the Ministry of Public Health Version 2 (normally ‘V.2’) screening test for risk of substance use, and were clinically diagnosed by their attending psychiatrist. Results: The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for SUDST was 0.79. The scores obtained from the SUDST were in high agreement with the V.2 and clinical diagnosis (p-value<0.001). Factor analysis showed three components of substance use disorder: 1) preoccupation and loss of control, 2) risky/harmful use, and 3) biopsychosocial aspects. Of the total possible score of 11, the cut-off points for identifying severe, moderate, and mild levels of risk were ≥7, 5-6, and 3-4, respectively, with sensitivity=72.7%-96.5% and specificity=61.9%-88.7%. Conclusion: The SUDST had high reliability and validity and could be used to detect patients at risk of substance use disorders.
基于精神障碍诊断与统计手册(DSM-5)的新型物质使用障碍筛查试验的开发与验证
目的:缺乏物质使用障碍的筛查工具是卫生保健工作者在患者护理和转诊方面面临的一个重大问题。本研究旨在开发一种物质使用障碍筛查测试(SUDST),以实现基于第五版精神疾病诊断与统计手册(DSM-5)的物质使用障碍严重程度的准确分类,可被卫生专业人员在所有环境中用于对有物质使用障碍风险的个体进行基本筛查。材料和方法:在对DSM-5进行深入研究后,开发了11个问题,然后对207名因使用甲基苯丙胺而接受治疗的参与者进行了测试。参与者接受了SUDST,即公共卫生部第2版(通常为' V.2 ')药物使用风险筛查试验的访谈,并由其主治精神病医生进行临床诊断。结果:SUDST的Cronbach’s alpha系数为0.79。SUDST评分与V.2和临床诊断高度一致(p值<0.001)。因子分析显示物质使用障碍的三个组成部分:1)专注和失去控制,2)危险/有害使用,3)生物心理社会方面。在11分的可能总分中,鉴定严重、中度和轻度风险水平的分界点分别为≥7、5-6和3-4,敏感性=72.7%-96.5%,特异性=61.9%-88.7%。结论:SUDST具有较高的信度和效度,可用于检测存在物质使用障碍风险的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信