Analysis of retrospective selection of peer review experts based on the results of the review

Ruihua Sun, Kangda Yu, Kai Xu, Huan Li, Ruimin Guo, Chang Xiao, Wanling Wu, Mei Song
{"title":"Analysis of retrospective selection of peer review experts based on the results of the review","authors":"Ruihua Sun, Kangda Yu, Kai Xu, Huan Li, Ruimin Guo, Chang Xiao, Wanling Wu, Mei Song","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-1924.2019.01.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nDiscussion on the methods of retrospectively selecting peer review experts based on the results of review. \n \n \nMethods \nBased on the review data of peer reviewers, peer review experts are retrospectively selected based on the voting, rating and comprehensive evaluations, as well as their variations and errors during the review. \n \n \nResults \nThrough the retrospective selection of peer reviewers, there is a better convergence of reviews, which assures the quality of future peer reviews. This method is superior to the prospective selection of peer reviewers. \n \n \nConclusions \nBased on the results of the review, retrospective selection of peer review experts is feasible and helpful for the selection of high-level peer review experts, which can improve the quality of peer review and standardize peer review. \n \n \nKey words: \nPeer review; Retrospective selection; Evaluation experts","PeriodicalId":59555,"journal":{"name":"中华医学科研管理杂志","volume":"25 6","pages":"18-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华医学科研管理杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-1924.2019.01.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective Discussion on the methods of retrospectively selecting peer review experts based on the results of review. Methods Based on the review data of peer reviewers, peer review experts are retrospectively selected based on the voting, rating and comprehensive evaluations, as well as their variations and errors during the review. Results Through the retrospective selection of peer reviewers, there is a better convergence of reviews, which assures the quality of future peer reviews. This method is superior to the prospective selection of peer reviewers. Conclusions Based on the results of the review, retrospective selection of peer review experts is feasible and helpful for the selection of high-level peer review experts, which can improve the quality of peer review and standardize peer review. Key words: Peer review; Retrospective selection; Evaluation experts
根据审评结果对同行审评专家进行回顾性选择的分析
目的探讨根据评审结果回顾性选择同行评审专家的方法。方法根据同行评审人员的评审数据,根据投票、评分和综合评价,以及评审过程中同行评审专家的变化和错误,对同行评审专家进行回顾性选择。结果通过对同行评审人员的回顾性选择,评审具有更好的收敛性,保证了未来同行评审的质量。这种方法优于同行评审员的前瞻性选择。结论根据评审结果,回顾性选择同行评审专家是可行的,有助于高水平同行评审专家的选择,可以提高同行评审的质量,规范同行评审。关键词:同行评审;回顾性选择;评估专家
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3322
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信