Cesarean section delivery rates, determinants, and indications: a retrospective study in Dekemhare Hospital

Idris.M. Idris, S. Menghisteab
{"title":"Cesarean section delivery rates, determinants, and indications: a retrospective study in Dekemhare Hospital","authors":"Idris.M. Idris, S. Menghisteab","doi":"10.1097/GRH.0000000000000056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Cesarean section delivery is at increasing rate worldwide. The present study was designed to explore the cesarean section delivery rate, and its common indications along with their socio-demographic determinants in Dekemhare Hospital, Southern region of Eritrea. Methods and Materials: A retrospective study was utilized to retrieve data of all women who delivered in Dekemhare Hospital during 2019. Using a structured questionnaire, all information required was recorded using data files such as birth (vaginal and cesarean) files, pregnancy registration file, and neonatal data. All women who delivered by cesarean section, their indications were collected reviewing registration records of the operating theater where the procedure was conducted. To describe the results, both descriptive and analytical analysis were conducted using SPSS version 25. χ2 test and multivariate logistic regression analysis were done to identify determinants of cesarean section. A significance level of 0.05 was used as a cut point of statistical significance. Main Findings: The rate of cesarean section delivery was 10.1%. The top 6 indications of cesarean section were: malposition (26.3%), prolonged and obstructed labor (21.2%), mal-presentation (14.4%), previous/repeat cesarean section (10.2%), amniotic fluid disorders (9.3%), and fetal distress (5.9%). Mothers who were nulliparous [odds ratio (OR): 9.2; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.8–14.3; P-value: 0.007], referral from other health facility (OR: 7.8, 95% CI: 3.7–16.5, P-value <0.0001), and who had delivered stillbirths (OR: 8.2; 95% CI: 1.7–38.9; P-value: 0.008) were more likely to deliver through cesarean section. Conclusion: The rate of cesarean section in Dekemhare hospital is fairly optimal (10.1%). Prolonged and obstructed labor, mal-presentation and malposition were the most common indications. Nulliparous and referral mothers had higher risk of cesarean section. Decision-making for cesarean section should outweigh the benefits and risks of the intervention within the context of women’s entire reproductive life-cycle.","PeriodicalId":92638,"journal":{"name":"Global reproductive health","volume":"114 1-2","pages":"e56 - e56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global reproductive health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GRH.0000000000000056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objectives: Cesarean section delivery is at increasing rate worldwide. The present study was designed to explore the cesarean section delivery rate, and its common indications along with their socio-demographic determinants in Dekemhare Hospital, Southern region of Eritrea. Methods and Materials: A retrospective study was utilized to retrieve data of all women who delivered in Dekemhare Hospital during 2019. Using a structured questionnaire, all information required was recorded using data files such as birth (vaginal and cesarean) files, pregnancy registration file, and neonatal data. All women who delivered by cesarean section, their indications were collected reviewing registration records of the operating theater where the procedure was conducted. To describe the results, both descriptive and analytical analysis were conducted using SPSS version 25. χ2 test and multivariate logistic regression analysis were done to identify determinants of cesarean section. A significance level of 0.05 was used as a cut point of statistical significance. Main Findings: The rate of cesarean section delivery was 10.1%. The top 6 indications of cesarean section were: malposition (26.3%), prolonged and obstructed labor (21.2%), mal-presentation (14.4%), previous/repeat cesarean section (10.2%), amniotic fluid disorders (9.3%), and fetal distress (5.9%). Mothers who were nulliparous [odds ratio (OR): 9.2; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.8–14.3; P-value: 0.007], referral from other health facility (OR: 7.8, 95% CI: 3.7–16.5, P-value <0.0001), and who had delivered stillbirths (OR: 8.2; 95% CI: 1.7–38.9; P-value: 0.008) were more likely to deliver through cesarean section. Conclusion: The rate of cesarean section in Dekemhare hospital is fairly optimal (10.1%). Prolonged and obstructed labor, mal-presentation and malposition were the most common indications. Nulliparous and referral mothers had higher risk of cesarean section. Decision-making for cesarean section should outweigh the benefits and risks of the intervention within the context of women’s entire reproductive life-cycle.
剖宫产率、决定因素和适应症:Dekemhare医院的回顾性研究
目的:世界范围内剖宫产率呈上升趋势。本研究旨在探讨厄立特里亚南部地区Dekemhare医院剖宫产率及其常见适应症及其社会人口统计学决定因素。方法和材料:采用回顾性研究方法检索2019年在Dekemhare医院分娩的所有妇女的数据。采用结构化问卷,使用分娩(阴道和剖宫产)文件、妊娠登记文件和新生儿数据等数据文件记录所需的所有信息。所有经剖宫产分娩的妇女,其指征均收集于进行手术的手术室登记记录。为了描述结果,使用SPSS版本25进行描述性和分析性分析。采用χ2检验和多因素logistic回归分析确定剖宫产的决定因素。采用显著性水平0.05作为具有统计学显著性的切点。主要发现:剖宫产率为10.1%。剖宫产的前6位指征分别为:体位不正(26.3%)、产程延长及难产(21.2%)、胎位不正(14.4%)、既往/再次剖宫产(10.2%)、羊水异常(9.3%)、胎儿窘迫(5.9%)。未生育的母亲[优势比(OR): 9.2;95%置信区间(CI): 1.8-14.3;p值:0.007],转诊自其他医疗机构(OR: 7.8, 95% CI: 3.7-16.5, p值<0.0001),分娩过死胎(OR: 8.2;95% ci: 1.7-38.9;p值:0.008)更容易通过剖宫产分娩。结论:Dekemhare医院剖宫产率较优(10.1%)。延长和难产,胎位不正是最常见的指征。未产母亲和转诊母亲剖宫产的风险较高。在妇女整个生殖生命周期的背景下,剖宫产的决策应超过干预的益处和风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信