Bank lending and macroprudential policies: are Islamic banks differentially affected?

Abdullatif Albinali
{"title":"Bank lending and macroprudential policies: are Islamic banks differentially affected?","authors":"Abdullatif Albinali","doi":"10.1108/ies-02-2022-0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of the paper is to study the relevance of macroprudential policies (MPPs) in influencing bank lending in small open economies with dual banking systems.Design/methodology/approachIn the analysis, the author employed the dynamic panel data methodology as compared to alternate techniques since it is able to address potential endogeneity challenges.FindingsUsing quarterly data from the period 2002–2020, the author finds that MPPs are highly effective in containing the growth of public credit, whereas its impact on private credit is much less effective. The disaggregated findings reveal that macroprudential measures are less effective in containing the growth of private credit by Islamic banks.Originality/valueThe majority of studies on MPPs are focused on emerging and advanced economies, limiting their policy appeal from the standpoint of small open economies. In this connection, this paper contributes to the literature on the relevance of such policies for a small open economy with a dual banking system and significant hydrocarbon exports. The paper's analysis therefore holds relevance for similar economies, both in the region and elsewhere, on the role and relevance of MPPs with emphasis on Islamic banks.","PeriodicalId":34300,"journal":{"name":"Islamic Economic Studies","volume":"21 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Islamic Economic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ies-02-2022-0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of the paper is to study the relevance of macroprudential policies (MPPs) in influencing bank lending in small open economies with dual banking systems.Design/methodology/approachIn the analysis, the author employed the dynamic panel data methodology as compared to alternate techniques since it is able to address potential endogeneity challenges.FindingsUsing quarterly data from the period 2002–2020, the author finds that MPPs are highly effective in containing the growth of public credit, whereas its impact on private credit is much less effective. The disaggregated findings reveal that macroprudential measures are less effective in containing the growth of private credit by Islamic banks.Originality/valueThe majority of studies on MPPs are focused on emerging and advanced economies, limiting their policy appeal from the standpoint of small open economies. In this connection, this paper contributes to the literature on the relevance of such policies for a small open economy with a dual banking system and significant hydrocarbon exports. The paper's analysis therefore holds relevance for similar economies, both in the region and elsewhere, on the role and relevance of MPPs with emphasis on Islamic banks.
银行贷款和宏观审慎政策:伊斯兰银行会受到不同的影响吗?
本文的目的是研究宏观审慎政策(mpp)在影响双重银行制度的小型开放经济体银行贷款方面的相关性。设计/方法/方法在分析中,与其他技术相比,作者采用了动态面板数据方法,因为它能够解决潜在的内生性挑战。利用2002年至2020年的季度数据,作者发现,mpp在遏制公共信贷增长方面非常有效,而对私人信贷的影响则要小得多。分解后的结果显示,宏观审慎措施在遏制伊斯兰银行私人信贷增长方面效果较差。独创性/价值大多数关于mpp的研究都集中在新兴和发达经济体,从小型开放经济体的角度来看,限制了它们的政策吸引力。在这方面,本文有助于有关此类政策对具有双重银行体系和大量碳氢化合物出口的小型开放经济体的相关性的文献。因此,本文的分析对该地区和其他地区的类似经济体都具有相关性,即mpp的作用和相关性,重点是伊斯兰银行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信