Lunch on the Grass: Three Women Art Educators of Color

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 Q4 ETHNIC STUDIES
J. Acuff, Vanessa López, Gloria J. Wilson
{"title":"Lunch on the Grass: Three Women Art Educators of Color","authors":"J. Acuff, Vanessa López, Gloria J. Wilson","doi":"10.1080/10999949.2019.1647084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We are three art educators, Women of Color (WoC), in higher education. In this article, we use trioethnography, a dialogic methodology, to provide context for understanding our struggles as such. We describe our challenges navigating a field (art education) that has embraced feminist scholarship, yet has historically paid little attention to how the intersections of race and gender systemically marginalizes WoC. We utilize scholarship from feminists of color, and the artwork of Black, queer, female visual artist Mickalene Thomas to counter the negation of our voices and reveal the complexity of our lived experiences to our predominately White female field. We look to intersectional feminisms to shift the art education discourse so that WoC’s matrices of oppression are considered. Ultimately, we seek to complicate the traditional feminist discourse that occurs in the art education field. Using trioethnography as a methodology allowed our recorded and transcribed dialogs to become our site of inquiry and, ultimately, become narratives of resistance in relation to dominant narratives/discourse. We offer three thematic lenses for examining our dialog: “Keeping it Real,” “Invisible Burdens,” and “Kinship Ties.” Further, we juxtapose these narratives alongside our photographic reenactment of Thomas’s artwork as a backdrop and third space for examination.","PeriodicalId":44850,"journal":{"name":"Souls","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10999949.2019.1647084","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Souls","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10999949.2019.1647084","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

We are three art educators, Women of Color (WoC), in higher education. In this article, we use trioethnography, a dialogic methodology, to provide context for understanding our struggles as such. We describe our challenges navigating a field (art education) that has embraced feminist scholarship, yet has historically paid little attention to how the intersections of race and gender systemically marginalizes WoC. We utilize scholarship from feminists of color, and the artwork of Black, queer, female visual artist Mickalene Thomas to counter the negation of our voices and reveal the complexity of our lived experiences to our predominately White female field. We look to intersectional feminisms to shift the art education discourse so that WoC’s matrices of oppression are considered. Ultimately, we seek to complicate the traditional feminist discourse that occurs in the art education field. Using trioethnography as a methodology allowed our recorded and transcribed dialogs to become our site of inquiry and, ultimately, become narratives of resistance in relation to dominant narratives/discourse. We offer three thematic lenses for examining our dialog: “Keeping it Real,” “Invisible Burdens,” and “Kinship Ties.” Further, we juxtapose these narratives alongside our photographic reenactment of Thomas’s artwork as a backdrop and third space for examination.
草地上的午餐:三位女性色彩艺术教育家
我们是高等教育中的三位艺术教育家,有色人种女性(WoC)。在这篇文章中,我们使用三民族志,一种对话方法,为理解我们的斗争提供背景。我们描述了我们在一个接受女权主义学术的领域(艺术教育)中面临的挑战,但历史上很少关注种族和性别的交叉如何系统地边缘化WoC。我们利用有色人种女权主义者的学术成果,以及黑人、酷儿、女性视觉艺术家Mickalene Thomas的艺术作品,来对抗对我们声音的否定,并向我们以白人为主的女性领域揭示我们生活经历的复杂性。我们期待交叉的女性主义来改变艺术教育话语,从而考虑到WoC的压迫矩阵。最终,我们试图使艺术教育领域中出现的传统女权主义话语复杂化。使用三民族志作为一种方法,使我们记录和转录的对话成为我们的调查场所,并最终成为与主导叙事/话语相关的抵抗叙事。我们提供了三个主题镜头来检查我们的对话:“保持真实”、“看不见的负担”和“亲属关系”。此外,我们将这些叙事与托马斯艺术作品的摄影再现并置,作为背景和第三个检查空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Souls
Souls ETHNIC STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信