{"title":"Foreign Judgments Recognition and Enforcement in Civil and Commercial Matters in Japan","authors":"Béligh Elbalti","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3323993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to provide a detailed overview of the \nrecognition and enforcement of foreign judgments (hereinafter referred to as \n“REFJ”) system in Japan. It shows that Japanese courts, under the guidance of \nthe Supreme Court, have been generous in recognizing and enforcing foreign \njudgments. The recognition requirements have been interpreted in a reasonable \nway which strikes a good balance between conflicting interests. Therefore, it \ncan be safely said that unless there are good reasons justifying non-recognition, \nforeign judgments are very likely to be recognized and enforced in Japan. One \nof the characteristic features of the Japanese system of REFJ is that it has \nremained (almost) substantially unaltered despite the occasional reforms and \namendments that it has undergone during its history. This longevity of the \nstatutory principles can be explained by the adequacy of the current regime. It \ncan also be explained by the important role played by the courts which \ndeveloped an extensive body of jurisprudential solutions giving flesh to the \nbare-boned legislative solutions.","PeriodicalId":82241,"journal":{"name":"Osaka University law review","volume":"97 12","pages":"1-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osaka University law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3323993","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to provide a detailed overview of the
recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments (hereinafter referred to as
“REFJ”) system in Japan. It shows that Japanese courts, under the guidance of
the Supreme Court, have been generous in recognizing and enforcing foreign
judgments. The recognition requirements have been interpreted in a reasonable
way which strikes a good balance between conflicting interests. Therefore, it
can be safely said that unless there are good reasons justifying non-recognition,
foreign judgments are very likely to be recognized and enforced in Japan. One
of the characteristic features of the Japanese system of REFJ is that it has
remained (almost) substantially unaltered despite the occasional reforms and
amendments that it has undergone during its history. This longevity of the
statutory principles can be explained by the adequacy of the current regime. It
can also be explained by the important role played by the courts which
developed an extensive body of jurisprudential solutions giving flesh to the
bare-boned legislative solutions.