Quarantining activism: COVID-19, frontline defenders and intensifying extractivism in the Philippines

IF 2 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
W. Dressler
{"title":"Quarantining activism: COVID-19, frontline defenders and intensifying extractivism in the Philippines","authors":"W. Dressler","doi":"10.2458/jpe.2955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How does the intersection of authoritarian populism and a global pandemic reinforce the suppression of human rights, dismantle environmental protections, and accelerate resource extraction? In parts of Southeast Asia, the rise of authoritarian regimes has created conditions of impunity in which state and non-state actors have exploited restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic to restrain activism, contain indigenous livelihoods, and intensify resource exploitation. This article explores how political control and violence against activists (‘defenders') under authoritarian Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte have intersected with and been reinforced throughCOVID-19 health measures to curtail grass-roots efforts to protect social and environmental safeguards. Since March 2020, violence against defenders has gone viral as activism in the country has been quarantined. Under Duterte's authoritarian populist rhetoric, state actors, parastatal and shadowy assassins have allegedly used public health measures to suppress activism further,enabling the harassment, arrests, and deaths of defenders and the intensification of resource extraction. Based on a critical review of news media and conservation policy, I describe the history and current context of defenders being 'quarantined' by authorities using lockdown measures to coercively suppress social and environmental activism across the country. I examine cases from Palawan Island to show how political authorities and elites have used COVID-19 to suppress defender mobility and enforcement practices and how lulls in defending and discourses of 'pandemic recovery' have facilitated mining and deforestation. The conclusion asserts that paying attention to how political conjunctures produce violent governance and local resistance reveals civil society's crucial role and vulnerabilities in protecting human rights and the environment in the Philippines and Southeast Asia.","PeriodicalId":46814,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Political Ecology","volume":"21 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Political Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2458/jpe.2955","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

How does the intersection of authoritarian populism and a global pandemic reinforce the suppression of human rights, dismantle environmental protections, and accelerate resource extraction? In parts of Southeast Asia, the rise of authoritarian regimes has created conditions of impunity in which state and non-state actors have exploited restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic to restrain activism, contain indigenous livelihoods, and intensify resource exploitation. This article explores how political control and violence against activists (‘defenders') under authoritarian Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte have intersected with and been reinforced throughCOVID-19 health measures to curtail grass-roots efforts to protect social and environmental safeguards. Since March 2020, violence against defenders has gone viral as activism in the country has been quarantined. Under Duterte's authoritarian populist rhetoric, state actors, parastatal and shadowy assassins have allegedly used public health measures to suppress activism further,enabling the harassment, arrests, and deaths of defenders and the intensification of resource extraction. Based on a critical review of news media and conservation policy, I describe the history and current context of defenders being 'quarantined' by authorities using lockdown measures to coercively suppress social and environmental activism across the country. I examine cases from Palawan Island to show how political authorities and elites have used COVID-19 to suppress defender mobility and enforcement practices and how lulls in defending and discourses of 'pandemic recovery' have facilitated mining and deforestation. The conclusion asserts that paying attention to how political conjunctures produce violent governance and local resistance reveals civil society's crucial role and vulnerabilities in protecting human rights and the environment in the Philippines and Southeast Asia.
隔离行动主义:新冠肺炎、前线捍卫者和菲律宾日益严重的剥削主义
独裁民粹主义和全球疫情的交叉如何加强对人权的压制,破坏环境保护,加速资源开采?在东南亚部分地区,威权政权的崛起创造了有罪不罚的条件,在这种情况下,国家和非国家行为者利用新冠肺炎大流行期间的限制来限制激进主义,遏制土著生计,并加剧资源开采。本文探讨了菲律宾独裁总统罗德里戈·杜特尔特领导下的政治控制和针对活动人士的暴力行为(“罪犯”)如何与新冠肺炎卫生措施产生交集,并通过这些措施得到加强,以遏制基层保护社会和环境保障的努力。自2020年3月以来,由于该国的激进主义活动被隔离,针对维权者的暴力行为在网上疯传。据称,在杜特尔特的独裁民粹主义言论下,国家行为者、半官方和暗中暗杀者利用公共卫生措施进一步压制激进主义,导致维权者受到骚扰、逮捕和死亡,并加剧资源开采。基于对新闻媒体和保护政策的批判性审查,我描述了维权者被当局“隔离”的历史和当前背景,当局利用封锁措施在全国范围内强制镇压社会和环境活动。我研究了巴拉望岛的案例,以显示政治当局和精英如何利用新冠肺炎来抑制辩护人的流动和执法行为,以及辩护的停顿和“疫情恢复”的言论如何促进了采矿和砍伐森林。结论认为,关注政治形势如何产生暴力治理和地方抵抗,揭示了民间社会在菲律宾和东南亚保护人权和环境方面的关键作用和脆弱性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Political Ecology
Journal of Political Ecology ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
17.40%
发文量
47
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Political Ecology is a peer reviewed journal (ISSN: 1073-0451), one of the longest standing, Gold Open Access journals in the social sciences. It began in 1994 and welcomes submissions in English, French and Spanish. We encourage research into the linkages between political economy and human environmental impacts across different locations and academic disciplines. The approach used in the journal is political ecology, not other fields, and authors should state clearly how their work contributes to, or extends, this approach. See, for example, the POLLEN network, or the ENTITLE blog.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信