An Experiential Investigation of Tax Professionals' Contentious Interactions with Clients

IF 1.3 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Donna D. Bobek, Derek Dalton, Amy M. Hageman, Robin R. Radtke
{"title":"An Experiential Investigation of Tax Professionals' Contentious Interactions with Clients","authors":"Donna D. Bobek, Derek Dalton, Amy M. Hageman, Robin R. Radtke","doi":"10.2308/ATAX-52174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper is a descriptive exploration of the under-researched area of contentious interactions between tax professionals in public accounting and their clients. We collect data in two waves. First, we employ an experiential questionnaire (EQ) to obtain rich, detailed data about actual contentious client interactions experienced by tax professionals. Second, we conduct a follow-up survey based on the results of the EQ to provide additional insight. We find that tax professionals often employ arguments relating to possible taxing authority (e.g., Internal Revenue Service) actions and the technical merits of the tax position to persuade their clients. We also provide additional details about the types of contentious issues tax professionals experience and how these issues are resolved. Importantly, our results point to a need for more training on how to deal with contentious issues, as most professionals strongly believe training is needed, even though few have actually received training.\n Data Availability: Contact authors.","PeriodicalId":45477,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Taxation Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Taxation Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/ATAX-52174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This paper is a descriptive exploration of the under-researched area of contentious interactions between tax professionals in public accounting and their clients. We collect data in two waves. First, we employ an experiential questionnaire (EQ) to obtain rich, detailed data about actual contentious client interactions experienced by tax professionals. Second, we conduct a follow-up survey based on the results of the EQ to provide additional insight. We find that tax professionals often employ arguments relating to possible taxing authority (e.g., Internal Revenue Service) actions and the technical merits of the tax position to persuade their clients. We also provide additional details about the types of contentious issues tax professionals experience and how these issues are resolved. Importantly, our results point to a need for more training on how to deal with contentious issues, as most professionals strongly believe training is needed, even though few have actually received training. Data Availability: Contact authors.
税务专业人员与客户竞争性互动的经验调查
本文对公共会计中税务专业人员与其客户之间存在争议的互动这一研究不足的领域进行了描述性探索。我们分两波收集数据。首先,我们使用体验式问卷(EQ)来获得税务专业人员所经历的实际有争议的客户互动的丰富、详细的数据。其次,我们根据EQ的结果进行了一项后续调查,以提供更多的见解。我们发现,税务专业人员经常利用与税务机关(如美国国税局)可能采取的行动和税务状况的技术优势有关的论点来说服他们的客户。我们还提供了有关税务专业人员遇到的有争议问题类型以及如何解决这些问题的更多细节。重要的是,我们的研究结果表明,需要对如何处理有争议的问题进行更多的培训,因为大多数专业人士强烈认为需要培训,尽管很少有人真正接受过培训。数据可用性: 联系作者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
14
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信