Percutaneous transpedicular vertebroplasty using calcium phosphate cement for osteoporotic vertebral fractures: A prospective study of functional outcomes

Swapnil Priyadarshi, V. Singhal, Sameer Gupta
{"title":"Percutaneous transpedicular vertebroplasty using calcium phosphate cement for osteoporotic vertebral fractures: A prospective study of functional outcomes","authors":"Swapnil Priyadarshi, V. Singhal, Sameer Gupta","doi":"10.4103/jodp.jodp_99_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Vertebral compression fractures are the most common osteoporotic fracture in old age group causing incapacitating pain and producing significant disability. Approximately one-third of these patients do not respond to traditional conservative treatments. Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV) is a minimally invasive treatment option being increasingly used and traditionally being done using polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), but it has some disadvantages. Calcium phosphate cement (CPC) is a new entity with many benefits over PMMA such as it being biodegradable, little or no heat generation during polymerization, and remodeling into healthy bone. Aims: The aim of this study was to analyze the functional outcome, restoration of wedge angle, and vertebral height after vertebroplasty in osteoporotic vertebral wedge compression fractures. Subjects and Methods: In our study, a total of 21 symptomatic patients (between 55 and 80 years of age), refractory to conservative treatment, having kyphosis and vertebral wedge collapse were included in the study. Pre- and postoperative comparisons were done clinically (Oswestry Disability Index and Visual Analog Scale [VAS] score) and radiologically. Statistical Analysis Used: SPSS software version 22.0 was used for statistical analysis. Results: Preoperatively in all patients, Oswestry disability score was >60% and VAS score >7 indicating severe disability. On subsequent follow-ups at 15 days, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 9 months, we found a significantly reduced VAS score (<2) and Oswestry disability score (<20%) in 19/21 (90%) patients indicating very minimal residual disability in majority of the patients. Conclusions: Our study shows that PV using CPC is a promising new procedure with the benefits of quick improvement in mobility, decreased pain-related doctor visits, decreased nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs usage postoperatively, and overall increased quality of life.","PeriodicalId":34809,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Diseases and Traumatology","volume":"607 ","pages":"157 - 163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Diseases and Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jodp.jodp_99_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Vertebral compression fractures are the most common osteoporotic fracture in old age group causing incapacitating pain and producing significant disability. Approximately one-third of these patients do not respond to traditional conservative treatments. Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV) is a minimally invasive treatment option being increasingly used and traditionally being done using polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), but it has some disadvantages. Calcium phosphate cement (CPC) is a new entity with many benefits over PMMA such as it being biodegradable, little or no heat generation during polymerization, and remodeling into healthy bone. Aims: The aim of this study was to analyze the functional outcome, restoration of wedge angle, and vertebral height after vertebroplasty in osteoporotic vertebral wedge compression fractures. Subjects and Methods: In our study, a total of 21 symptomatic patients (between 55 and 80 years of age), refractory to conservative treatment, having kyphosis and vertebral wedge collapse were included in the study. Pre- and postoperative comparisons were done clinically (Oswestry Disability Index and Visual Analog Scale [VAS] score) and radiologically. Statistical Analysis Used: SPSS software version 22.0 was used for statistical analysis. Results: Preoperatively in all patients, Oswestry disability score was >60% and VAS score >7 indicating severe disability. On subsequent follow-ups at 15 days, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 9 months, we found a significantly reduced VAS score (<2) and Oswestry disability score (<20%) in 19/21 (90%) patients indicating very minimal residual disability in majority of the patients. Conclusions: Our study shows that PV using CPC is a promising new procedure with the benefits of quick improvement in mobility, decreased pain-related doctor visits, decreased nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs usage postoperatively, and overall increased quality of life.
应用磷酸钙骨水泥经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体骨折:一项功能预后的前瞻性研究
背景:椎体压缩性骨折是老年人群中最常见的骨质疏松性骨折,引起失能性疼痛和严重的残疾。这些患者中约有三分之一对传统的保守治疗无效。经皮椎体成形术(PV)是一种微创治疗方法,使用越来越多,传统上使用聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA),但它有一些缺点。磷酸钙水泥(CPC)是一种新的实体,与PMMA相比具有许多优点,如可生物降解,在聚合过程中很少或不产生热量,并且可以重塑成健康的骨骼。目的:本研究的目的是分析骨质疏松性椎体楔压骨折椎体成形术后的功能结局、楔角恢复和椎体高度。研究对象和方法:本研究共纳入21例有症状、保守治疗难治性、后凸和椎体楔形塌陷的患者(年龄55 ~ 80岁)。术前和术后进行临床比较(Oswestry残疾指数和视觉模拟量表[VAS]评分)和影像学比较。统计分析方法:采用SPSS 22.0软件进行统计分析。结果:所有患者术前Oswestry失能评分> - 60%,VAS评分> - 7为重度失能。在随后的15天、1个月、3个月、6个月和9个月的随访中,我们发现19/21(90%)患者的VAS评分(<2)和Oswestry残疾评分(<20%)显著降低,表明大多数患者的残余残疾非常小。结论:我们的研究表明,PV使用CPC是一种很有前景的新手术,可以快速改善活动能力,减少与疼痛相关的医生就诊,减少术后非甾体类抗炎药的使用,并提高总体生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信