Identifying factors that contribute to burnout and resilience among hospital-based addiction medicine providers: A qualitative study.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Erin Bredenberg, C. Tietbohl, A. Dafoe, L. Thurman, S. Calcaterra
{"title":"Identifying factors that contribute to burnout and resilience among hospital-based addiction medicine providers: A qualitative study.","authors":"Erin Bredenberg, C. Tietbohl, A. Dafoe, L. Thurman, S. Calcaterra","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4116413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nInpatient Addiction Consultation Services (ACS) fill an important need by connecting hospitalized patients with substance use disorders with resources for treatment; however, providers of these services may be at risk for burnout. In this qualitative study, we aimed to identify factors associated with burnout and, conversely, resilience among multidisciplinary providers working on ACS.\n\n\nMETHODS\nWe completed 26 semi-structured interviews with clinicians working on ACS, including physicians, social workers, and advanced practice providers. Twelve institutions across the country were represented. The study recruited participants via email solicitation to ACS directors and then via snowball sampling. We used an inductive, grounded theory approach to analyze data.\n\n\nRESULTS\nProviders described factors contributing to burnout and strategies for promoting resilience, and three main themes arose: (1) Systemic barriers contributed to provider burnout, (2) Engaging in meaningful work increased resilience, and (3) Team dynamics influenced perceptions of burnout and resilience.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nOur results suggest that hospital-based addiction medicine work is intrinsically rewarding for many providers and that engaging with other addiction providers to debrief challenging encounters or engage in advocacy work can be protective against burnout. However, administrative and systemic factors are frequent sources of frustration for providers of ACS. Structured debriefings may help to mitigate burnout. Furthermore, training to enhance providers' ability to engage effectively in advocacy work within and between hospital systems has the potential to promote resilience and protect against burnout among ACS providers.","PeriodicalId":17148,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment","volume":"14 4","pages":"108924"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4116413","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Inpatient Addiction Consultation Services (ACS) fill an important need by connecting hospitalized patients with substance use disorders with resources for treatment; however, providers of these services may be at risk for burnout. In this qualitative study, we aimed to identify factors associated with burnout and, conversely, resilience among multidisciplinary providers working on ACS. METHODS We completed 26 semi-structured interviews with clinicians working on ACS, including physicians, social workers, and advanced practice providers. Twelve institutions across the country were represented. The study recruited participants via email solicitation to ACS directors and then via snowball sampling. We used an inductive, grounded theory approach to analyze data. RESULTS Providers described factors contributing to burnout and strategies for promoting resilience, and three main themes arose: (1) Systemic barriers contributed to provider burnout, (2) Engaging in meaningful work increased resilience, and (3) Team dynamics influenced perceptions of burnout and resilience. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that hospital-based addiction medicine work is intrinsically rewarding for many providers and that engaging with other addiction providers to debrief challenging encounters or engage in advocacy work can be protective against burnout. However, administrative and systemic factors are frequent sources of frustration for providers of ACS. Structured debriefings may help to mitigate burnout. Furthermore, training to enhance providers' ability to engage effectively in advocacy work within and between hospital systems has the potential to promote resilience and protect against burnout among ACS providers.
在医院成瘾药物提供者中确定导致倦怠和恢复力的因素:一项定性研究。
简介住院患者成瘾咨询服务(ACS)通过将患有物质使用障碍的住院患者与治疗资源联系起来,满足了一项重要需求;然而,这些服务的提供者可能面临倦怠的风险。在这项定性研究中,我们旨在确定与ACS多学科提供者的倦怠和恢复力相关的因素。METHODSWe完成了对ACS临床医生的26次半结构化访谈,其中包括医生、社会工作者和高级实践提供者。全国12个机构派代表出席了会议。该研究通过向ACS董事发送电子邮件,然后通过滚雪球抽样的方式招募参与者。我们使用归纳的、有根据的理论方法来分析数据。结果提供者描述了导致倦怠的因素和促进恢复力的策略,产生了三个主要主题:(1)系统性障碍导致提供者倦怠,(2)从事有意义的工作提高了恢复力,(3)团队动态影响了对倦怠和恢复力的感知。结论我们的研究结果表明,以医院为基础的成瘾医学工作对许多提供者来说本质上是有回报的,与其他成瘾提供者一起汇报具有挑战性的遭遇或参与宣传工作可以防止倦怠。然而,行政和系统因素是ACS提供者经常感到沮丧的原因。结构化的汇报可能有助于缓解倦怠。此外,培训以提高提供者在医院系统内和医院系统之间有效参与宣传工作的能力,有可能提高ACS提供者的复原力,防止他们精疲力竭。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
220
期刊介绍: The Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment (JSAT) features original reviews, training and educational articles, special commentary, and especially research articles that are meaningful to the treatment of alcohol, heroin, marijuana, and other drugs of dependence. JSAT is directed toward treatment practitioners from all disciplines (medicine, nursing, social work, psychology, and counseling) in both private and public sectors, including those involved in schools, health centers, community agencies, correctional facilities, and individual practices. The editors emphasize that JSAT articles should address techniques and treatment approaches that can be used directly by contemporary practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信