Feminism, Human Rights, and Abortion Debates in Mexico

IF 0.6 3区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
Jennifer J. Nelson
{"title":"Feminism, Human Rights, and Abortion Debates in Mexico","authors":"Jennifer J. Nelson","doi":"10.1353/jowh.2022.0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Although the history of reproductive politics in Mexico is long, this article focuses on one short period of that history—a year that featured an explosive national debate over opposing human rights claims made by feminists and pro-life activists as they argued over a law passed in 1990 by the Chiapas state legislature to decriminalize abortion. Claims by feminists that legal abortion was necessary to realize women's human rights collided with pro-life claims for human rights protections from conception. While the positioning of the right to abortion at the center of women's human rights claims has been effective at garnering support for legal abortion, it also reveals a dilemma of human rights campaigns, the tendency to focus on legal rights as universally relevant to all women and the failure to attend to the particular, and often economic, needs and demands of women in diverse historical and geographic contexts.","PeriodicalId":45948,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Womens History","volume":"298 1","pages":"119 - 140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Womens History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jowh.2022.0016","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract:Although the history of reproductive politics in Mexico is long, this article focuses on one short period of that history—a year that featured an explosive national debate over opposing human rights claims made by feminists and pro-life activists as they argued over a law passed in 1990 by the Chiapas state legislature to decriminalize abortion. Claims by feminists that legal abortion was necessary to realize women's human rights collided with pro-life claims for human rights protections from conception. While the positioning of the right to abortion at the center of women's human rights claims has been effective at garnering support for legal abortion, it also reveals a dilemma of human rights campaigns, the tendency to focus on legal rights as universally relevant to all women and the failure to attend to the particular, and often economic, needs and demands of women in diverse historical and geographic contexts.
墨西哥的女权主义、人权和堕胎辩论
摘要:尽管墨西哥的生殖政治历史悠久,但本文关注的是历史上的一个短暂时期——这一年,女权主义者和反堕胎活动家反对1990年恰帕斯州立法机构通过的一项将堕胎合法化的法律,引发了一场爆炸性的全国性辩论。女权主义者声称合法堕胎是实现妇女人权的必要条件,而反堕胎者则主张保护妇女在怀孕期间的人权。虽然将堕胎权置于妇女人权主张的中心位置,有效地赢得了对合法堕胎的支持,但它也揭示了人权运动的一个困境,即倾向于把重点放在与所有妇女普遍相关的合法权利上,而未能注意到妇女在不同历史和地理背景下的特殊需要和要求,而且往往是经济需要和要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Journal of Women"s History is the first journal devoted exclusively to the international field of women"s history. It does not attempt to impose one feminist "line" but recognizes the multiple perspectives captured by the term "feminisms." Its guiding principle is a belief that the divide between "women"s history" and "gender history" can be, and is, bridged by work on women that is sensitive to the particular historical constructions of gender that shape and are shaped by women"s experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信