Matrix Acidizing: A Laboratory and Field Investigation of Sludge Formation and Removal of Oil-Based Drilling Mud Filter Cake

IF 1.3 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, PETROLEUM
Tariq Almubarak, M. Alkhaldi, J. H. Ng, H. Nasr-El-Din
{"title":"Matrix Acidizing: A Laboratory and Field Investigation of Sludge Formation and Removal of Oil-Based Drilling Mud Filter Cake","authors":"Tariq Almubarak, M. Alkhaldi, J. H. Ng, H. Nasr-El-Din","doi":"10.2118/178034-PA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Hydrochloric and organic acids have been extensively used to enhance well productivity or injectivity in tight carbonate formations (10 to 50 md). The use of these acids, however, can cause instances of complete production loss. This is especially common due to incompatibilities of the acidizing fluid and oil, which can lead to the formation of acid/oil emulsions and sludge formation. Consequently, it is necessary to properly identify and remove such emulsions or precipitations without causing any further damage.\n Compatibility studies were conducted using representative crude samples and hydrochloric acid (HCl). The experiments were conducted at various temperatures up to 240°F using high-pressure/high-temperature (HP/HT) aging cells for both live and spent acid samples, in which some of the experiments included an antisludge, an iron-control agent, and a demulsifier. In addition, another set of experiments was performed in the presence of ferric ions (Fe3+). The total iron concentration in these experiments was varied between 0 and1,000 ppm. The results showed that commonly used acid systems were not compatible with representative oil field samples. The amount of sludge formed and the stability of formed emulsions increased significantly in the presence of ferric ions and was more severe in the presence of hydrogen sulfide (H2S).\n Using a field case, this paper will cover the methodology used to ascertain the source of formation damage from acidizing, study the different factors that influence the formation of acid/oil emulsion and sludge formation mechanism, and show how they can be removed. In this example, acid/oil emulsions, sludge formation, and improper drilling mud filter-cake removal were the reasons behind the production loss. However, the methodology can be expanded to cater the many acidizing failure cases faced in the industry worldwide.","PeriodicalId":51165,"journal":{"name":"SPE Drilling & Completion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2118/178034-PA","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPE Drilling & Completion","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/178034-PA","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, PETROLEUM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Hydrochloric and organic acids have been extensively used to enhance well productivity or injectivity in tight carbonate formations (10 to 50 md). The use of these acids, however, can cause instances of complete production loss. This is especially common due to incompatibilities of the acidizing fluid and oil, which can lead to the formation of acid/oil emulsions and sludge formation. Consequently, it is necessary to properly identify and remove such emulsions or precipitations without causing any further damage. Compatibility studies were conducted using representative crude samples and hydrochloric acid (HCl). The experiments were conducted at various temperatures up to 240°F using high-pressure/high-temperature (HP/HT) aging cells for both live and spent acid samples, in which some of the experiments included an antisludge, an iron-control agent, and a demulsifier. In addition, another set of experiments was performed in the presence of ferric ions (Fe3+). The total iron concentration in these experiments was varied between 0 and1,000 ppm. The results showed that commonly used acid systems were not compatible with representative oil field samples. The amount of sludge formed and the stability of formed emulsions increased significantly in the presence of ferric ions and was more severe in the presence of hydrogen sulfide (H2S). Using a field case, this paper will cover the methodology used to ascertain the source of formation damage from acidizing, study the different factors that influence the formation of acid/oil emulsion and sludge formation mechanism, and show how they can be removed. In this example, acid/oil emulsions, sludge formation, and improper drilling mud filter-cake removal were the reasons behind the production loss. However, the methodology can be expanded to cater the many acidizing failure cases faced in the industry worldwide.
基质酸化:油基钻井泥浆滤饼污泥形成与去除的实验室与现场研究
盐酸和有机酸已被广泛用于提高致密碳酸盐岩地层(10 ~ 50 md)的产能或注入能力。然而,使用这些酸可能会导致完全的生产损失。由于酸化液与油的不相容,这可能导致酸/油乳剂的形成和污泥的形成,这是特别常见的。因此,有必要在不造成任何进一步损害的情况下正确识别和去除这些乳剂或沉淀物。采用具有代表性的原油样品与盐酸(HCl)进行相容性研究。实验在不同温度下进行,最高可达240°F,使用高压/高温(HP/HT)老化细胞对活酸和废酸样品进行处理,其中一些实验包括抗污泥剂、铁控制剂和破乳剂。此外,还在铁离子(Fe3+)存在下进行了另一组实验。在这些实验中,总铁浓度在0到1000 ppm之间变化。结果表明,常用的酸体系与代表性油田样品不相容。在铁离子存在下,污泥的形成量和形成乳状液的稳定性显著增加,在硫化氢(H2S)存在下更为严重。通过现场实例,本文将介绍用于确定酸化地层损害来源的方法,研究影响酸/油乳化液形成的不同因素和污泥形成机制,并展示如何消除这些因素。在这个例子中,酸/油乳剂、污泥形成和钻井泥浆滤饼去除不当是造成产量损失的原因。然而,该方法可以扩展,以满足全球酸化行业面临的许多酸化失败案例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SPE Drilling & Completion
SPE Drilling & Completion 工程技术-工程:石油
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
29
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Covers horizontal and directional drilling, drilling fluids, bit technology, sand control, perforating, cementing, well control, completions and drilling operations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信