graffiti: pro et contra

Q2 Arts and Humanities
K. Lidin, E. Grigoryeva
{"title":"graffiti: pro et contra","authors":"K. Lidin, E. Grigoryeva","doi":"10.7480/PROJECTBAIKAL.56.1330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From time immemorial people have been ornamenting and painting the walls of urban houses. However, from the 1960s the invention of markers and then spray paints gave an opportunity for amateur muralists to cover huge areas with frescos. Graffitists have turned from a marginal and semi-criminal element into an evident factor of creating urban interior. The scale of this phenomenon can be compared only with its ambiguity. What is graffiti? Is it vandalism full of evil or demonstration of spontaneous genius? Should it be prohibited or protected as cultural heritage of contemporary times? In May, the Moscow City Duma adopted the law on graffiti regulation, and shortly before it six of PB permanent authors had shared their opinions on this issue brought up (as it often happens) by Alexander Rappaport (96).","PeriodicalId":36968,"journal":{"name":"Project Baikal","volume":"25 10","pages":"95-95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Project Baikal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7480/PROJECTBAIKAL.56.1330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

From time immemorial people have been ornamenting and painting the walls of urban houses. However, from the 1960s the invention of markers and then spray paints gave an opportunity for amateur muralists to cover huge areas with frescos. Graffitists have turned from a marginal and semi-criminal element into an evident factor of creating urban interior. The scale of this phenomenon can be compared only with its ambiguity. What is graffiti? Is it vandalism full of evil or demonstration of spontaneous genius? Should it be prohibited or protected as cultural heritage of contemporary times? In May, the Moscow City Duma adopted the law on graffiti regulation, and shortly before it six of PB permanent authors had shared their opinions on this issue brought up (as it often happens) by Alexander Rappaport (96).
涂鸦:赞成与反对
从远古时代起,人们就开始在城市房屋的墙壁上装饰和绘画。然而,从20世纪60年代开始,记号笔和喷漆的发明给业余壁画家提供了一个机会,让他们可以在大片区域上画壁画。涂鸦艺术家已经从一个边缘的、半犯罪的元素变成了一个创造城市内部的明显因素。这种现象的规模只能用它的模糊性来比较。什么是涂鸦?这是充满邪恶的破坏行为还是自发的天才表现?它应该被禁止还是作为当代文化遗产被保护?5月,莫斯科市杜马通过了关于涂鸦管理的法律,在此之前不久,六名PB永久作者分享了他们对亚历山大·拉帕波特(96岁)提出的这个问题的看法(这经常发生)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Project Baikal
Project Baikal Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信