A Class Functionalist Theory of Race

IF 1.6 3区 社会学 Q2 ETHNIC STUDIES
David Calnitsky, Michael Billeaux Martinez
{"title":"A Class Functionalist Theory of Race","authors":"David Calnitsky, Michael Billeaux Martinez","doi":"10.1017/s1742058x22000224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article makes a case for weak class reductionism. In particular, we advance a theoretical account that largely “reduces” a social construct called race to another social construct called class. Once you acknowledge that race is not itself a prime mover, but rather something to be explained, class as an explanans turns out to be a strong candidate. Before making this case, we distinguish our account from three alternative forms of class reductionism, which we reject: the notions that (1) class is a more fundamental form of identity than race; (2) class is of greater normative importance than race; and (3) race is an epiphenomenon of class, without independent effects. We then argue for one form of class reduction that establishes race as causally dependent on class. In particular, we provide a general defense of functional explanations, argue that capitalist class relations can functionally explain the persistence of race, and finally, delineate the limits of that explanation. Because the nature of functional explanation requires the explanandum to have important effects in the world, this argument puts race at the center of any discussion of capitalist class relations in racialized societies and explains it on the basis of its effects rather than its causes. Nonetheless, as we show in our conclusion, none of these arguments imply that race or racism is inherent to capitalist class relations. Racism may be explained by capitalism, even if it is not necessary for it.","PeriodicalId":47158,"journal":{"name":"Du Bois Review-Social Science Research on Race","volume":"227 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Du Bois Review-Social Science Research on Race","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1742058x22000224","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article makes a case for weak class reductionism. In particular, we advance a theoretical account that largely “reduces” a social construct called race to another social construct called class. Once you acknowledge that race is not itself a prime mover, but rather something to be explained, class as an explanans turns out to be a strong candidate. Before making this case, we distinguish our account from three alternative forms of class reductionism, which we reject: the notions that (1) class is a more fundamental form of identity than race; (2) class is of greater normative importance than race; and (3) race is an epiphenomenon of class, without independent effects. We then argue for one form of class reduction that establishes race as causally dependent on class. In particular, we provide a general defense of functional explanations, argue that capitalist class relations can functionally explain the persistence of race, and finally, delineate the limits of that explanation. Because the nature of functional explanation requires the explanandum to have important effects in the world, this argument puts race at the center of any discussion of capitalist class relations in racialized societies and explains it on the basis of its effects rather than its causes. Nonetheless, as we show in our conclusion, none of these arguments imply that race or racism is inherent to capitalist class relations. Racism may be explained by capitalism, even if it is not necessary for it.
阶级功能主义种族理论
这篇文章为弱阶级还原论辩护。特别是,我们提出了一个理论解释,在很大程度上将一个称为种族的社会结构“简化”为另一个名为阶级的社会结构。一旦你承认种族本身并不是一个主要推动者,而是一个需要解释的东西,那么作为解释者的阶级就会成为一个强有力的候选者。在提出这一观点之前,我们将我们的叙述与阶级还原论的三种替代形式区分开来,我们拒绝这三种形式:(1)阶级是比种族更基本的身份形式;(2) 阶级比种族在规范上更重要;(3)种族是阶级的副现象,没有独立的影响。然后,我们主张一种形式的阶级减少,将种族确立为对阶级的因果依赖。特别是,我们对功能解释进行了一般性的辩护,认为资本主义阶级关系可以在功能上解释种族的持久性,并最终界定了这种解释的局限性。因为功能解释的本质要求解释在世界上产生重要影响,所以这一论点将种族置于种族化社会中任何关于资本主义阶级关系的讨论的中心,并根据其影响而非原因进行解释。尽管如此,正如我们在结论中所表明的那样,这些论点都不意味着种族或种族主义是资本主义阶级关系所固有的。种族主义可以用资本主义来解释,即使资本主义没有必要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信