Equivalent geometric imperfections for the LTB‐design of members with I‐sections

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
R. Stroetmann, Sergei Fominow
{"title":"Equivalent geometric imperfections for the LTB‐design of members with I‐sections","authors":"R. Stroetmann, Sergei Fominow","doi":"10.1002/stco.202200025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For the stability assessment of members and structures according to EN 1993‐1‐1, the equivalent member method, the geometrical non‐linear calculation with equivalent geometrical imperfections or the GMNIA analysis with geometrical imperfections and residual stresses can be used alternatively. The second possibility requires a corresponding model for the cross‐section resistance. For the verification of lateral torsional buckling, bow imperfections e0 out‐of‐plane are defined, which lead in combination with the given loading in‐plane and the geometrical non‐linear analysis to bending moments Mz and torsion of the members. The amplitudes of the imperfections are highly dependent on the nature of the approach (e.g., scaling of the buckling shape, assumption of bow imperfections) and the verification method for the members. Within the framework of the scientific work supervised by the TU Dresden and TU Darmstadt, extensive parametric studies were conducted to calibrate imperfections for lateral torsional buckling based on the GMNIA. After determining the nature of imperfections and the design models for section resistance, this article presents results of these parametric studies and shows the calibration of imperfections for a standardisation proposal based on EN1993‐1‐1. The evaluation of the data in combination with the necessary simplifications for the design practice leads to appropriate definitions of imperfection values e0,LT and the necessary differentiations.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/stco.202200025","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For the stability assessment of members and structures according to EN 1993‐1‐1, the equivalent member method, the geometrical non‐linear calculation with equivalent geometrical imperfections or the GMNIA analysis with geometrical imperfections and residual stresses can be used alternatively. The second possibility requires a corresponding model for the cross‐section resistance. For the verification of lateral torsional buckling, bow imperfections e0 out‐of‐plane are defined, which lead in combination with the given loading in‐plane and the geometrical non‐linear analysis to bending moments Mz and torsion of the members. The amplitudes of the imperfections are highly dependent on the nature of the approach (e.g., scaling of the buckling shape, assumption of bow imperfections) and the verification method for the members. Within the framework of the scientific work supervised by the TU Dresden and TU Darmstadt, extensive parametric studies were conducted to calibrate imperfections for lateral torsional buckling based on the GMNIA. After determining the nature of imperfections and the design models for section resistance, this article presents results of these parametric studies and shows the calibration of imperfections for a standardisation proposal based on EN1993‐1‐1. The evaluation of the data in combination with the necessary simplifications for the design practice leads to appropriate definitions of imperfection values e0,LT and the necessary differentiations.
I型截面构件LTB设计的等效几何缺陷
对于根据EN 1993‐1‐1进行的构件和结构的稳定性评估,可替代使用等效构件法、具有等效几何缺陷的几何非线性计算或具有几何缺陷和残余应力的GMNIA分析。第二种可能性需要一个相应的横截面阻力模型。为了验证横向扭转屈曲,定义了平面外的弓形缺陷e0,结合给定的平面内载荷和构件弯矩Mz和扭转的几何非线性分析。缺陷的振幅在很大程度上取决于方法的性质(例如,屈曲形状的缩放、弓形缺陷的假设)和构件的验证方法。在德累斯顿大学和达姆施塔特大学监督的科学工作框架内,进行了广泛的参数研究,以基于GMNIA校准横向扭转屈曲的缺陷。在确定了缺陷的性质和截面阻力的设计模型后,本文介绍了这些参数研究的结果,并显示了基于EN1993‐1的标准化提案的缺陷校准。对数据的评估与设计实践的必要简化相结合,得出了缺陷值e0、LT和必要微分的适当定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信