IMPLICATIONS OF FULFILLING ANIMAL WELFARE AND ANIMAL PROTECTION DUE TO SPECIESIST AND ANTHROPOCENTRIC BELIEFS

Fiolita Berandhini
{"title":"IMPLICATIONS OF FULFILLING ANIMAL WELFARE AND ANIMAL PROTECTION DUE TO SPECIESIST AND ANTHROPOCENTRIC BELIEFS","authors":"Fiolita Berandhini","doi":"10.24843/bulvet.2023.v15.i05.p27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Every year, billions of animals are slaughtered on industrial agricultures and animals whose status does not include under the category of protected animals and stray dogs or cats are subjected to various kinds of abusive behavior by human as a result of the moral exclusion of animals of certain species. The idea of speciesism and anthropocentrism causes suffering on a massive scale that people may find hard to fathom. This paper discusses the definition of speciesism, anthropocentrism and its impact on advocacy for farm animals, stray animals and wild animals that are not protected by law, which begins with an explanation of how animals stand before the law and how society practices the concept of speciesism and anthropocentrism which has an impact on animal welfare. Then, identify how speciesism and anthropocentrism affects the protection of animals classified in certain species as a result of unfavorable protection or treatment for the animals. The position of animals that are still categorized as property by the law makes it difficult to apply animal protection for certain species of animals and for them who do not have owners. This condition occurs because the definitions of animals included in various existing laws are not in line with the clauses in the articles that should protect certain animal species as stated in the definitions in the regulations. In addition, there is a strong belief that certain species of animals such as the wildlife animals which are legally protected, companion animals (i.e. dogs and cats) and animals whose owned by people are more deserving of protection than other animal species and for non-owned animals. At the end of writing, this paper examines how the concepts of speciesism and anthropocentrism, which are unfavorable treatment or consideration towards those who are not categorized as the human and towards certain animal species which often become victims of speciesist and anthropocentric ideas have an impact on animal law protection.","PeriodicalId":30995,"journal":{"name":"Buletin Veteriner Udayana","volume":"4 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Buletin Veteriner Udayana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24843/bulvet.2023.v15.i05.p27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Every year, billions of animals are slaughtered on industrial agricultures and animals whose status does not include under the category of protected animals and stray dogs or cats are subjected to various kinds of abusive behavior by human as a result of the moral exclusion of animals of certain species. The idea of speciesism and anthropocentrism causes suffering on a massive scale that people may find hard to fathom. This paper discusses the definition of speciesism, anthropocentrism and its impact on advocacy for farm animals, stray animals and wild animals that are not protected by law, which begins with an explanation of how animals stand before the law and how society practices the concept of speciesism and anthropocentrism which has an impact on animal welfare. Then, identify how speciesism and anthropocentrism affects the protection of animals classified in certain species as a result of unfavorable protection or treatment for the animals. The position of animals that are still categorized as property by the law makes it difficult to apply animal protection for certain species of animals and for them who do not have owners. This condition occurs because the definitions of animals included in various existing laws are not in line with the clauses in the articles that should protect certain animal species as stated in the definitions in the regulations. In addition, there is a strong belief that certain species of animals such as the wildlife animals which are legally protected, companion animals (i.e. dogs and cats) and animals whose owned by people are more deserving of protection than other animal species and for non-owned animals. At the end of writing, this paper examines how the concepts of speciesism and anthropocentrism, which are unfavorable treatment or consideration towards those who are not categorized as the human and towards certain animal species which often become victims of speciesist and anthropocentric ideas have an impact on animal law protection.
物种主义和人类中心主义信仰对实现动物福利和动物保护的启示
每年,数以十亿计的动物被工业化农业屠杀,那些不属于受保护动物的动物和流浪狗或猫受到人类的各种虐待行为,这是对某些物种动物的道德排斥的结果。物种主义和人类中心主义的思想导致了人们可能难以理解的大规模痛苦。本文讨论了物种主义、人类中心主义的定义及其对保护农场动物、流浪动物和不受法律保护的野生动物的影响,首先解释了动物如何站在法律面前,以及社会如何实践物种主义和人类中心主义的概念,这对动物福利产生了影响。然后,确定物种主义和人类中心主义如何影响对某些物种分类的动物的保护,因为对动物的不利保护或待遇。仍然被法律归类为财产的动物的地位使得对某些种类的动物和没有主人的动物实施动物保护变得困难。出现这种情况的原因是,现行各种法律对动物的定义与条例定义中规定的保护某些动物物种的条款不一致。此外,人们强烈认为某些物种的动物,如受法律保护的野生动物,伴侣动物(即狗和猫)和人类拥有的动物比其他动物物种和非人类拥有的动物更值得保护。在写作的最后,本文探讨了物种主义和人类中心主义的概念,这是对那些不被归类为人类和某些动物物种往往成为物种主义和人类中心主义思想的受害者的不利待遇或考虑如何对动物法律保护产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信