Qingsong Tian, Yan Yu, Zhaoyang Xiang, Chongguang Li
{"title":"Agricultural technical education, interpersonal trust, and pesticide use by vegetable farmers in China","authors":"Qingsong Tian, Yan Yu, Zhaoyang Xiang, Chongguang Li","doi":"10.1080/1389224X.2020.1844769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Purpose Agricultural technical education is widely used in Chinese agricultural production to reduce farmers’ pesticide overuse. However, the effectiveness of technical education is questioned by scholars who found that it fails to promote farmers’ pesticide management. In this study, we aimed to explore whether farmers’ interpersonal trust in education staff affects the efficiency of technical education. Design/methodology/approach A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study was conducted on Chinese vegetable farmers with 117 open field vegetable growers and 119 greenhouse vegetable growers. Data were analyzed using a multivariate regression model. Findings The results show that technical education can significantly reduce farmers’ pesticide application in vegetable production. And the effect of specific guidance is stronger than that of course training. The response of farmers on technical education, as a proxy of farmers’ understanding capacity on education knowledge, negatively affects farmers’ pesticide costs. More importantly, we find that farmers’ trust in education staff could affect the positive effect of agricultural technical education on pesticide application. Practical implications This study will enable education staff/officers to value interpersonal relationships, which can instruct farmers to turn the pesticide knowledge they received from technical education into production practice. Theoretical implications Promoting farmers’ trust in information providers will increase the efficiency and quality of knowledge transmission and transformation in agricultural technical education. Originality/value This paper highlights the importance of interpersonal trust in agricultural technical education, and offers an available explanation for controversy over on efficiency of agricultural technical education.","PeriodicalId":46772,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Education & Extension","volume":"54 8","pages":"211 - 227"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1389224X.2020.1844769","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural Education & Extension","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2020.1844769","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
ABSTRACT Purpose Agricultural technical education is widely used in Chinese agricultural production to reduce farmers’ pesticide overuse. However, the effectiveness of technical education is questioned by scholars who found that it fails to promote farmers’ pesticide management. In this study, we aimed to explore whether farmers’ interpersonal trust in education staff affects the efficiency of technical education. Design/methodology/approach A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study was conducted on Chinese vegetable farmers with 117 open field vegetable growers and 119 greenhouse vegetable growers. Data were analyzed using a multivariate regression model. Findings The results show that technical education can significantly reduce farmers’ pesticide application in vegetable production. And the effect of specific guidance is stronger than that of course training. The response of farmers on technical education, as a proxy of farmers’ understanding capacity on education knowledge, negatively affects farmers’ pesticide costs. More importantly, we find that farmers’ trust in education staff could affect the positive effect of agricultural technical education on pesticide application. Practical implications This study will enable education staff/officers to value interpersonal relationships, which can instruct farmers to turn the pesticide knowledge they received from technical education into production practice. Theoretical implications Promoting farmers’ trust in information providers will increase the efficiency and quality of knowledge transmission and transformation in agricultural technical education. Originality/value This paper highlights the importance of interpersonal trust in agricultural technical education, and offers an available explanation for controversy over on efficiency of agricultural technical education.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Agricultural Education & Extension is published to inform experts who do or use research on agricultural education and extension about research conducted in this field worldwide. Information about this research is needed to improve policies, strategies, methods and practices for agricultural education and extension. The Journal of Agricultural Education & Extension accepts authorative and well-referenced scientific articles within the field of agricultural education and extension after a double-blind peer review process. Agricultural education and extension faces profound change, and therefore its core area of attention is moving towards communication, competence development and performance improvement for a wide variety of fields and audiences, most of which can be studied from a multi-disciplinary perspective, including: -Communication for Development- Competence Management and Development- Corporate Social Responsibility and Human Resource Development- Design and Implementation of Competence–based Education- Environmental and Natural Resource Management- Entrepreneurship and Learning- Facilitating Multiple-Stakeholder Processes- Health and Society- Innovation of Agricultural-Technical Education- Innovation Systems and Learning- Integrated Rural Development- Interdisciplinary and Social Learning- Learning, Conflict and Decision Making- Poverty Reduction- Performance Improvement- Sustainable Agricultural Production