The moderating impact of auditor industry specialisation on the relationship between fair value disclosure and audit fees: empirical evidence from Jordan

IF 2.3 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
E. Alharasis, M. Prokofieva, Colin Clark
{"title":"The moderating impact of auditor industry specialisation on the relationship between fair value disclosure and audit fees: empirical evidence from Jordan","authors":"E. Alharasis, M. Prokofieva, Colin Clark","doi":"10.1108/ara-03-2022-0050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper investigates the application of the product differentiation and shared efficiency approaches to understand the impact of the auditor industry specialisation (IS) on audit fees in relation to Fair Value Disclosures (FVD).Design/methodology/approachThe study uses 1,470 firm-year observations for the period 2005–2018 and is focused on Jordanian financial firms. Two competing theoretical approaches of IS proxied by audit fee-based measures were employed: firstly, the product differentiation approach measured using Market Share-based (MS) measure and secondly, the shared efficiency approach measured using Portfolio Share-based (PS) measure. The paper employs the Ordinary Least Squares regression to test the association between the proportion of fair-valued assets (using fair value hierarchy inputs) and audit fees.FindingsThe results suggest that the association between the proportion of fair-valued assets and audit fees is strengthened (weakened) when the client hires specialist auditors identified by MS (PS). This association varied across the fair value inputs. Level 1 assets were found to be only moderated by both scenarios positively (negatively) for MS (PS) experts. The results are robust after controlling the endogeneity of auditor self-selection.Practical implicationsThe results provide valuable insights for policymakers into challenges of auditing FVD. These insights present a valuable input for the development of FVD policies and practices as well as providing guidance for updating auditor prices. Additionally, the results provide a foundation for policymakers and regulators to introduce and update fair value auditing practices. The current findings are generalisable to other countries, including the Middle East and North Africa, and are particularly beneficial for those countries which have adopted the fair value model.Originality/valueThis study contributes to the theory by demonstrating the impact of the auditor industry expertise on post-implementation costs of FVD. The novelty of the study lies in introducing principle-based standards requirements of FVD to test the relationship. This approach is based on the IFRS disclosure requirements using data from the Jordanian financial sector to examine this relationship.","PeriodicalId":8562,"journal":{"name":"Asian Review of Accounting","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Review of Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ara-03-2022-0050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

PurposeThis paper investigates the application of the product differentiation and shared efficiency approaches to understand the impact of the auditor industry specialisation (IS) on audit fees in relation to Fair Value Disclosures (FVD).Design/methodology/approachThe study uses 1,470 firm-year observations for the period 2005–2018 and is focused on Jordanian financial firms. Two competing theoretical approaches of IS proxied by audit fee-based measures were employed: firstly, the product differentiation approach measured using Market Share-based (MS) measure and secondly, the shared efficiency approach measured using Portfolio Share-based (PS) measure. The paper employs the Ordinary Least Squares regression to test the association between the proportion of fair-valued assets (using fair value hierarchy inputs) and audit fees.FindingsThe results suggest that the association between the proportion of fair-valued assets and audit fees is strengthened (weakened) when the client hires specialist auditors identified by MS (PS). This association varied across the fair value inputs. Level 1 assets were found to be only moderated by both scenarios positively (negatively) for MS (PS) experts. The results are robust after controlling the endogeneity of auditor self-selection.Practical implicationsThe results provide valuable insights for policymakers into challenges of auditing FVD. These insights present a valuable input for the development of FVD policies and practices as well as providing guidance for updating auditor prices. Additionally, the results provide a foundation for policymakers and regulators to introduce and update fair value auditing practices. The current findings are generalisable to other countries, including the Middle East and North Africa, and are particularly beneficial for those countries which have adopted the fair value model.Originality/valueThis study contributes to the theory by demonstrating the impact of the auditor industry expertise on post-implementation costs of FVD. The novelty of the study lies in introducing principle-based standards requirements of FVD to test the relationship. This approach is based on the IFRS disclosure requirements using data from the Jordanian financial sector to examine this relationship.
审计师行业专业化对公允价值披露与审计费用关系的调节作用——来自约旦的经验证据
本文研究了产品差异化和共享效率方法的应用,以了解审计师行业专业化(IS)对公允价值披露(FVD)相关审计费用的影响。设计/方法/方法本研究使用了2005-2018年期间的1470家公司年度观察结果,重点关注约旦金融公司。本文采用了两种相互竞争的、以审计费用为基准度量的信息系统理论方法:一是采用基于市场份额(MS)度量的产品差异化方法,二是采用基于组合份额(PS)度量的共享效率方法。本文采用普通最小二乘回归来检验公允价值资产比例(使用公允价值层次输入)与审计费用之间的关系。结果表明,当客户聘请经MS (PS)鉴定的专业审计师时,公允价值资产比例与审计费用之间的关联得到加强(减弱)。这种关联因公允价值输入而异。对于MS (PS)专家来说,第1级资产仅被两种情景正向(负向)调节。在控制了审计师自我选择的内生性后,结果是稳健的。实际意义研究结果为政策制定者提供了有价值的见解,以了解FVD审计的挑战。这些见解为FVD政策和实践的发展提供了宝贵的投入,并为更新审计师价格提供了指导。此外,研究结果为政策制定者和监管者引入和更新公允价值审计实践提供了基础。目前的研究结果可以推广到其他国家,包括中东和北非,对那些采用公允价值模式的国家尤其有益。原创性/价值本研究通过证明审计师行业专业知识对FVD实施后成本的影响,为该理论做出了贡献。本研究的新颖之处在于引入基于原则的FVD标准要求来检验二者之间的关系。该方法基于国际财务报告准则的披露要求,使用来自约旦金融部门的数据来检验这种关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Review of Accounting
Asian Review of Accounting BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
25.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Covering various fields of accounting, Asian Review of Accounting publishes research papers, commentary notes, review papers and practitioner oriented articles that address significant international issues as well as those that focus on Asia Pacific in particular.Coverage includes but is not limited to: -Financial accounting -Managerial accounting -Auditing -Taxation -Accounting information systems -Social and environmental accounting -Accounting education Perspectives or viewpoints arising from regional, national or international focus, a private or public sector information need, or a market-perspective or social and environmental perspective are greatly welcomed. Manuscripts that present viewpoints should address issues of wide interest among accounting scholars internationally and those in Asia Pacific in particular.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信