Development and Psychometric Evaluation of Persian Dynamic Spatial Quick Speech-in-Noise Test in Adults with Normal Hearing

IF 0.4 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
M. Ashrafi, Fatemeh Maharati, Sadegh Jafarzadeh Bejestani, A. Akbarzadeh Baghban
{"title":"Development and Psychometric Evaluation of Persian Dynamic Spatial Quick Speech-in-Noise Test in Adults with Normal Hearing","authors":"M. Ashrafi, Fatemeh Maharati, Sadegh Jafarzadeh Bejestani, A. Akbarzadeh Baghban","doi":"10.18502/avr.v31i1.8132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aim: Spatial hearing is a prerequisite for the proper function of the listener in complex auditory environments. In the present study, a Persian version of the dynamic spatial-quick speech in noise (DS-QSIN) has been developed with respect to all possible factors affecting the test and to run five lists for normal hearing subjects and assessment of reliability. \nMethods: To construct five new lists according to the original quick speech in noise (QSIN) test, we used frequent, familiar, and difficult words to construct unpredictable sentences. After determining the content and face validity of the sentences, 30 selected sentences were played using a DS-QSIN software for 35 subjects aged 18–25 years. The reliability of the test was assessed after repeating the test after two weeks. \nResults: According to expert judges, these 30 sentences showed acceptable  content  and  face validity with the changes. The average signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) loss of five lists was –5.2 dB. No significant difference was seen between men and women in all lists. The results indicate no difference in the average SNR loss between the five lists. Regarding the reliability assessment, the test-retest correlation coefficient was 0.5 to 0.7 (p<0.05). The intra-class correlation coefficient between test-retest was statistically significant (p>0.001) and confirmed that the lists have high reliability and repeatability. \nConclusion: DS-QSIN test showed good validity and reliability and can be helpful in diagnosis and selecting the best method for rehabilitation of people with a spatial hearing disorder.","PeriodicalId":34089,"journal":{"name":"Auditory and Vestibular Research","volume":"33 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Auditory and Vestibular Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/avr.v31i1.8132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aim: Spatial hearing is a prerequisite for the proper function of the listener in complex auditory environments. In the present study, a Persian version of the dynamic spatial-quick speech in noise (DS-QSIN) has been developed with respect to all possible factors affecting the test and to run five lists for normal hearing subjects and assessment of reliability. Methods: To construct five new lists according to the original quick speech in noise (QSIN) test, we used frequent, familiar, and difficult words to construct unpredictable sentences. After determining the content and face validity of the sentences, 30 selected sentences were played using a DS-QSIN software for 35 subjects aged 18–25 years. The reliability of the test was assessed after repeating the test after two weeks. Results: According to expert judges, these 30 sentences showed acceptable  content  and  face validity with the changes. The average signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) loss of five lists was –5.2 dB. No significant difference was seen between men and women in all lists. The results indicate no difference in the average SNR loss between the five lists. Regarding the reliability assessment, the test-retest correlation coefficient was 0.5 to 0.7 (p<0.05). The intra-class correlation coefficient between test-retest was statistically significant (p>0.001) and confirmed that the lists have high reliability and repeatability. Conclusion: DS-QSIN test showed good validity and reliability and can be helpful in diagnosis and selecting the best method for rehabilitation of people with a spatial hearing disorder.
正常听力成人波斯语动态空间快速噪声言语测试的发展及心理测量学评价
背景和目的:空间听觉是听者在复杂听觉环境中正常发挥功能的先决条件。在本研究中,针对影响测试的所有可能因素,开发了波斯版的动态空间快速噪声语音(DS-QSIN),并为正常听力受试者和可靠性评估列出了五个列表。方法:根据原有的噪声中快速语音(QSIN)测试,我们使用频繁词、熟悉词和困难词来构建不可预测的句子,构建五个新的列表。在确定句子的内容和面部有效性后,使用DS-QSIN软件为35名18-25岁的受试者播放了30个选定的句子。在两周后重复测试后评估测试的可靠性。结果:根据专家判断,这30个句子显示出可接受的内容,并随着变化而面临有效性。五个列表的平均信噪比(SNR)损失为-5.2 dB。在所有列表中,男性和女性之间没有显著差异。结果表明五个列表之间的平均SNR损失没有差异。关于可靠性评估,重新测试的相关系数为0.5至0.7(p0.001),证实了列表具有较高的可靠性和可重复性。结论:DS-QSIN测试具有良好的有效性和可靠性,有助于空间性听力障碍的诊断和选择最佳康复方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Auditory and Vestibular Research
Auditory and Vestibular Research Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信