Beyond proficiency

IF 0.1 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Stuart G. Towns, R. Todd
{"title":"Beyond proficiency","authors":"Stuart G. Towns, R. Todd","doi":"10.1787/0b1414ed-en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Many studies have investigated the correlations between linguistic features and human judgements of writing\n quality. These studies usually investigate either proficient student writing or exceptional literary writing. The current study\n attempts to bridge these two perspectives by comparing proficient writing to award-winning exceptional writing using movie reviews\n written by bloggers and Pulitzer Prize winners. A range of linguistic features representing syntactic complexity, lexical\n complexity, and lexical cohesion were analyzed using both automated and interpretive methods. It is found that some, but not all,\n of the trends seen in writing development studies continue on to exceptional writing, with lexical sophistication and lexical\n cohesion through conceptual associations making the largest contributions to the differences between proficient and exceptional\n writers.","PeriodicalId":42970,"journal":{"name":"English Text Construction","volume":"108 s1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English Text Construction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1787/0b1414ed-en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Many studies have investigated the correlations between linguistic features and human judgements of writing quality. These studies usually investigate either proficient student writing or exceptional literary writing. The current study attempts to bridge these two perspectives by comparing proficient writing to award-winning exceptional writing using movie reviews written by bloggers and Pulitzer Prize winners. A range of linguistic features representing syntactic complexity, lexical complexity, and lexical cohesion were analyzed using both automated and interpretive methods. It is found that some, but not all, of the trends seen in writing development studies continue on to exceptional writing, with lexical sophistication and lexical cohesion through conceptual associations making the largest contributions to the differences between proficient and exceptional writers.
超出能力
许多研究调查了语言特征与人类对写作质量判断之间的关系。这些研究通常调查精通的学生写作或杰出的文学写作。目前的研究试图通过比较熟练的写作和获奖的杰出写作来连接这两个观点,使用的是博主和普利策奖得主写的电影评论。使用自动和解释方法分析了一系列代表句法复杂性、词汇复杂性和词汇衔接的语言特征。我们发现,在写作发展研究中看到的一些趋势(但不是全部)持续到卓越的写作中,词汇的复杂性和通过概念联想产生的词汇衔接对熟练作家和卓越作家之间的差异贡献最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
English Text Construction
English Text Construction LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信