ISTIHSAN DALAM LITERATUR SYAFI’IYAH (Telaah Istihsan dalam Kitab Al-Mustaṣfa Al-Ghazali)

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Wardatun Nabilah, Arifki Budia Warman, Nurul 'Aini Octavia
{"title":"ISTIHSAN DALAM LITERATUR SYAFI’IYAH (Telaah Istihsan dalam Kitab Al-Mustaṣfa Al-Ghazali)","authors":"Wardatun Nabilah, Arifki Budia Warman, Nurul 'Aini Octavia","doi":"10.31958/juris.v20i1.3323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to examine the reasons for the views of Imam Abu Hamid Muhammad al-Ghazali in the Kitab of Al-Mustaṣfa min 'Ilmi Ushul which classifies Istihsan into the Mauhum argument (the argument that is admired). Istihsan is one of the ijtihad methods disputed by the scholars, although in reality, all scholars use it practically. Basically, the scholars use Istihsan in lughawi (language), which is \"to do something better\". But in terms of the term (which usually applies), scholars differ due to differences in understanding and defining \"Istihsan\". The method used is a qualitative method with a library research approach, with the finding that follows the best here (احسن) is the best from the propositions that have been revealed by Allah, not the best according to the inclination of reason alone. Furthermore, the argument that emerges inexplicably cannot be known whether it is imaginary or really exists. So that argument must be real, by taking it from the argument of Sharia, so that it appears real when he justifies or blames. So then, it is better to cancel Istihsan.","PeriodicalId":31912,"journal":{"name":"Juris Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah","volume":"151 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Juris Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v20i1.3323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This article aims to examine the reasons for the views of Imam Abu Hamid Muhammad al-Ghazali in the Kitab of Al-Mustaṣfa min 'Ilmi Ushul which classifies Istihsan into the Mauhum argument (the argument that is admired). Istihsan is one of the ijtihad methods disputed by the scholars, although in reality, all scholars use it practically. Basically, the scholars use Istihsan in lughawi (language), which is "to do something better". But in terms of the term (which usually applies), scholars differ due to differences in understanding and defining "Istihsan". The method used is a qualitative method with a library research approach, with the finding that follows the best here (احسن) is the best from the propositions that have been revealed by Allah, not the best according to the inclination of reason alone. Furthermore, the argument that emerges inexplicably cannot be known whether it is imaginary or really exists. So that argument must be real, by taking it from the argument of Sharia, so that it appears real when he justifies or blames. So then, it is better to cancel Istihsan.
本文旨在研究伊玛目阿布·哈米德·穆罕默德·加扎利在Al-Mustaṣfa min 'Ilmi Ushul的Kitab中的观点的原因,该观点将Istihsan归类为Mauhum论点(受人钦佩的论点)。Istihsan是学者们有争议的伊吉提哈德方法之一,尽管在现实中,所有的学者都在实际使用它。基本上,学者们在lughawi(语言)中使用Istihsan,意思是“做得更好”。但在术语(通常适用)方面,由于对“Istihsan”的理解和定义不同,学者们存在分歧。使用的方法是一种带有图书馆研究方法的定性方法,在这里发现最好的(احسن)是从真主所启示的命题中得到的最好的,而不是仅仅根据理性的倾向得到的最好的。此外,出现的莫名其妙的争论无法知道它是虚构的还是真的存在。所以这个论点必须是真实的,从伊斯兰教法的论点中提取出来,所以当他辩护或指责时,它看起来是真实的。所以,最好取消Istihsan。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书