Effect of crisaborole topical ointment, 2%, on atopic dermatitis–associated pruritus: an extended analysis of 2 phase 3 clinical trials

G. Yosipovitch, E. Simpson, H. Tan, R. Gerber, T. Luger, S. Ständer, W. Tom, J. Cappelleri, A. Bushmakin, W. Ports, A. Tallman
{"title":"Effect of crisaborole topical ointment, 2%, on atopic dermatitis–associated pruritus: an extended analysis of 2 phase 3 clinical trials","authors":"G. Yosipovitch, E. Simpson, H. Tan, R. Gerber, T. Luger, S. Ständer, W. Tom, J. Cappelleri, A. Bushmakin, W. Ports, A. Tallman","doi":"10.1097/itx.0000000000000012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Pruritus is an essential feature of atopic dermatitis (AD) and is widely considered the most distressing symptom. Crisaborole ointment is a nonsteroidal phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor for the treatment of mild to moderate AD. The efficacy of crisaborole for AD-associated pruritus was assessed in 2 phase 3 trials using the Severity of Pruritus Scale (SPS). Post hoc validation of the SPS identified that 1 SPS observation provided inadequate test-retest reliability. Therefore, extended analyses were conducted using at least 2 SPS observations for robust assessment of pruritus in the phase 3 crisaborole trials. Methods: Data were analyzed from 2 identically designed, vehicle-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trials designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of crisaborole in AD patients aged 2 years and above (AD-301: NCT02118766; AD-302: NCT02118792). At least 2 SPS observations were averaged for acceptable test-retest reliability. Results: At least 2 baseline observations were available for 569 patients in AD-301 and 561 patients in AD-302. Median time to pruritus improvement (SPS score ⩽1 with at least 1-point improvement from baseline) was shorter with crisaborole than with vehicle (AD-301: 5.0 vs. 10.0 d, P=0.0003; AD-302: 6.0 vs. 9.0 d, P=0.0087). At week 4, more crisaborole-treated patients than vehicle-treated patients experienced pruritus improvement (AD-301: 37% vs. 21%, P<0.0001; AD-302: 34% vs. 21%, P=0.0006), mean pruritus scores were lower with crisaborole than with vehicle (AD-301: 0.97 vs. 1.28, P<0.0001; AD-302: 1.08 vs. 1.35, P<0.0001), and more crisaborole-treated patients than vehicle-treated patients experienced a clinically important pruritus response (AD-301: 75% vs. 57%, P<0.0001; AD-302: 72% vs. 64%, P=0.0828). Conclusions: These extended analyses show that patients treated with crisaborole experienced rapid and clinically relevant improvement in AD-associated pruritus.","PeriodicalId":73523,"journal":{"name":"Itch (Philadelphia, Pa.)","volume":"226 24","pages":"e12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/itx.0000000000000012","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Itch (Philadelphia, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/itx.0000000000000012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Introduction: Pruritus is an essential feature of atopic dermatitis (AD) and is widely considered the most distressing symptom. Crisaborole ointment is a nonsteroidal phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor for the treatment of mild to moderate AD. The efficacy of crisaborole for AD-associated pruritus was assessed in 2 phase 3 trials using the Severity of Pruritus Scale (SPS). Post hoc validation of the SPS identified that 1 SPS observation provided inadequate test-retest reliability. Therefore, extended analyses were conducted using at least 2 SPS observations for robust assessment of pruritus in the phase 3 crisaborole trials. Methods: Data were analyzed from 2 identically designed, vehicle-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trials designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of crisaborole in AD patients aged 2 years and above (AD-301: NCT02118766; AD-302: NCT02118792). At least 2 SPS observations were averaged for acceptable test-retest reliability. Results: At least 2 baseline observations were available for 569 patients in AD-301 and 561 patients in AD-302. Median time to pruritus improvement (SPS score ⩽1 with at least 1-point improvement from baseline) was shorter with crisaborole than with vehicle (AD-301: 5.0 vs. 10.0 d, P=0.0003; AD-302: 6.0 vs. 9.0 d, P=0.0087). At week 4, more crisaborole-treated patients than vehicle-treated patients experienced pruritus improvement (AD-301: 37% vs. 21%, P<0.0001; AD-302: 34% vs. 21%, P=0.0006), mean pruritus scores were lower with crisaborole than with vehicle (AD-301: 0.97 vs. 1.28, P<0.0001; AD-302: 1.08 vs. 1.35, P<0.0001), and more crisaborole-treated patients than vehicle-treated patients experienced a clinically important pruritus response (AD-301: 75% vs. 57%, P<0.0001; AD-302: 72% vs. 64%, P=0.0828). Conclusions: These extended analyses show that patients treated with crisaborole experienced rapid and clinically relevant improvement in AD-associated pruritus.
crisaborole外用软膏(2%)治疗特应性皮炎相关瘙痒的效果:2项3期临床试验的扩展分析
引言:瘙痒是特应性皮炎(AD)的一个基本特征,被广泛认为是最令人痛苦的症状。Crisaborole软膏是一种非甾体磷酸二酯酶4抑制剂,用于治疗轻度至中度AD。在2项3期试验中,使用瘙痒严重程度量表(SPS)评估了Crisaborol治疗AD相关瘙痒的疗效。SPS的事后验证发现,1个SPS观察结果提供的重新测试可靠性不足。因此,在3期交叉口试验中,使用至少2个SPS观察结果进行了扩展分析,以对瘙痒进行稳健评估。方法:分析2项相同设计的、载体对照的、双盲的3期试验的数据,这些试验旨在研究克里斯aborole治疗2岁及以上AD患者的疗效和安全性(AD-301:NCT02118766;AD-302:NCT021187.92)。至少对2个SPS观测值进行了平均,以获得可接受的重新测试可靠性。结果:对于AD-301的569名患者和AD-302的561名患者,至少有2个基线观察结果可用。瘙痒改善的中位时间(SPS评分⩽1,与基线相比至少改善1分)使用crisaborole比使用赋形剂更短(AD-301:5.0 vs.10.0 d、 P=0.0003;AD-302:6.0与9.0 d、 P=0.0087)。在第4周,与载体治疗的患者相比,更多的crisaborole治疗的患者出现瘙痒改善(AD-301:37%对21%,P<0.0001;AD-302:34%对21%,P=0.0006),crisaborol治疗的平均瘙痒评分低于载体治疗(AD-301:0.97对1.28,<0.0001;AD-302:1.08对1.35,P<0.0001),与赋形剂治疗的患者相比,更多的crisaborole治疗的患者出现了临床重要的瘙痒反应(AD-301:75%对57%,P<0.0001;AD-302:72%对64%,P=0.00828)。结论:这些扩展分析表明,接受crisaborol治疗的患者在AD相关瘙痒方面得到了快速且临床相关的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信