Beyond the Big Five and Birds: Divergent ecotourism perspectives in rapidly changing Africa

IF 2.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
P. Scholte, S. A. Kamgang, E. Sabuhoro
{"title":"Beyond the Big Five and Birds: Divergent ecotourism perspectives in rapidly changing Africa","authors":"P. Scholte,&nbsp;S. A. Kamgang,&nbsp;E. Sabuhoro","doi":"10.1111/acv.12891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ecotourism has increasingly been recognized as an important source of revenue for protected areas as well as their surrounding communities (Hausmann <i>et al</i>., <span>2016</span>; Eyster, Naidoo, &amp; Chan, <span>2022</span>; Gupta <i>et al</i>., <span>2023</span>). Particularly in southern and eastern Africa, ecotourism is linked with charismatic species - the Big Five-, i.e., African elephant (<i>Loxodonta africana</i>), rhinoceros (<i>Diceros bicornis</i>, <i>Ceratotherius simum</i>), lion (<i>Panthera leo</i>), African buffalo (<i>Syncerus caffer</i>), and leopard (<i>Panthera pardus</i>). In ‘Not just the Big Five: African ecotourists prefer parks brimming with bird diversity’, Eyster, Naidoo, &amp; Chan (<span>2022</span>) show how ecotourists also value birdwatching and viewing other wildlife. Ecotourism-based initiatives founded on local cultures can also be found (Hausmann <i>et al</i>., <span>2016</span>). This recent research shows that reigning conservation interventions such as reintroducing Big Five species, which drain scarce budgets, may be directed to other attractions -birds, culture-, more effectively in the long run (Mbaiwa, <span>2015</span>). This has significant implications for biodiversity conservation and how tourism may benefit local economies in sub-Saharan Africa (Mbaiwa, <span>2015</span>; Gupta <i>et al</i>., <span>2023</span>).</p><p>Eyster, Naidoo, &amp; Chan (<span>2022</span>) explicitly mention their focus on southern Africa and East Africa (SSE), a regional perspective that is very common (Bauer <i>et al</i>., <span>2020</span>). The authors' choice of ‘Big Five alternatives’ – giraffe (<i>Giraffa</i> spp.), cheetah (<i>Acinonyx jubatus</i>), wild dog (<i>Lycaon pictus</i>), birds – is limited to savannas species, thereby neglecting African forest species, such as mountain gorilla (<i>Gorilla beringei</i>) and chimpanzee (<i>Pan troglodytes</i>), the backbone of a flourishing ecotourism industry in Rwanda, Uganda and beyond (Sabuhoro <i>et al</i>., <span>2017</span>). This also holds for burgeoning ecotourism targeting lowland gorillas (<i>Gorilla gorilla</i>) (Cameroon, Central African Republic, Gabon) and Ethiopian mountain endemics such as walia ibex (<i>Capra walie</i>) and mountain nyala (<i>Tragelaphus buxtoni</i>).</p><p>COVID-19 was a wake-up call, demonstrating too much reliance on ecotourism in Africa and beyond, a lesson all too easy to forget (Gupta <i>et al</i>., <span>2023</span>). Much less known have been the consequences of a degrading security situation in West-Central-Horn (WCH) of Africa over the recent decade (Bauer <i>et al</i>., <span>2020</span>). The WCH part of the annual ecotourism visit map that Eyster, Naidoo, &amp; Chan (<span>2022</span>) present has turned since 2007, with the exception of the western coastal parts, completely red or orange, i.e. (formally) advising against travel, invalidating, amongst other things, travel insurance policies (Figure 1). In WCH Africa, once flourishing ecotourism sites such as Waza National Park (Cameroon) have collapsed, with only trophy hunting keeping up in the region (Scholte, <span>2021</span>; Scholte <i>et al</i>., <span>2022</span>).</p><p>Sub-Saharan Africa's human population is expected to triple, from roughly 1 billion in 2017 to 3 billion people by 2100 (Vollset <i>et al</i>., <span>2020</span>). When Eyster, Naidoo, &amp; Chan (<span>2022</span>) suggest widening the scope of ecotourism, they seem to refer to international tourism, not considering the still undeveloped domestic and intra-Africa tourism that, triggered by demographic changes, is expected to increase dramatically (Stone &amp; Nyaupane, <span>2019</span>). One can only speculate as to the consequence of these changes on ecotourism. The few studies on African domestic tourism suggest that ‘culture, livelihoods, and crowded spaces, with a variety of activities, influence domestic tourists’ gaze, whereas privacy, tranquility, and quietness influence the international tourists' gaze’ (Stone &amp; Nyaupane, <span>2019</span>). Ecotourism targeting the diaspora market, with, for example, over a million visitors to Ethiopia in 2022 alone, has received even less attention, and one wonders what its ‘ecotourism gaze’ may look like.</p><p>Ecotourism in Africa, based on international and increasingly domestic visitors, is expected to continue playing an important role for protected areas and the neighboring communities (Hausmann <i>et al</i>., <span>2016</span>; Sabuhoro <i>et al</i>., <span>2017</span>; Eyster, Naidoo, &amp; Chan, <span>2022</span>; Gupta <i>et al</i>., <span>2023</span>). Taking into account regional perspectives and the rapid changes, including security and demographic, that many regions in the sub-Saharan Africa undergo, allows research and practice to cater for how ecotourism in this part of the world may develop over the decades to come.</p>","PeriodicalId":50786,"journal":{"name":"Animal Conservation","volume":"26 4","pages":"443-445"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/acv.12891","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acv.12891","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Ecotourism has increasingly been recognized as an important source of revenue for protected areas as well as their surrounding communities (Hausmann et al., 2016; Eyster, Naidoo, & Chan, 2022; Gupta et al., 2023). Particularly in southern and eastern Africa, ecotourism is linked with charismatic species - the Big Five-, i.e., African elephant (Loxodonta africana), rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis, Ceratotherius simum), lion (Panthera leo), African buffalo (Syncerus caffer), and leopard (Panthera pardus). In ‘Not just the Big Five: African ecotourists prefer parks brimming with bird diversity’, Eyster, Naidoo, & Chan (2022) show how ecotourists also value birdwatching and viewing other wildlife. Ecotourism-based initiatives founded on local cultures can also be found (Hausmann et al., 2016). This recent research shows that reigning conservation interventions such as reintroducing Big Five species, which drain scarce budgets, may be directed to other attractions -birds, culture-, more effectively in the long run (Mbaiwa, 2015). This has significant implications for biodiversity conservation and how tourism may benefit local economies in sub-Saharan Africa (Mbaiwa, 2015; Gupta et al., 2023).

Eyster, Naidoo, & Chan (2022) explicitly mention their focus on southern Africa and East Africa (SSE), a regional perspective that is very common (Bauer et al., 2020). The authors' choice of ‘Big Five alternatives’ – giraffe (Giraffa spp.), cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus), wild dog (Lycaon pictus), birds – is limited to savannas species, thereby neglecting African forest species, such as mountain gorilla (Gorilla beringei) and chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes), the backbone of a flourishing ecotourism industry in Rwanda, Uganda and beyond (Sabuhoro et al., 2017). This also holds for burgeoning ecotourism targeting lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla) (Cameroon, Central African Republic, Gabon) and Ethiopian mountain endemics such as walia ibex (Capra walie) and mountain nyala (Tragelaphus buxtoni).

COVID-19 was a wake-up call, demonstrating too much reliance on ecotourism in Africa and beyond, a lesson all too easy to forget (Gupta et al., 2023). Much less known have been the consequences of a degrading security situation in West-Central-Horn (WCH) of Africa over the recent decade (Bauer et al., 2020). The WCH part of the annual ecotourism visit map that Eyster, Naidoo, & Chan (2022) present has turned since 2007, with the exception of the western coastal parts, completely red or orange, i.e. (formally) advising against travel, invalidating, amongst other things, travel insurance policies (Figure 1). In WCH Africa, once flourishing ecotourism sites such as Waza National Park (Cameroon) have collapsed, with only trophy hunting keeping up in the region (Scholte, 2021; Scholte et al., 2022).

Sub-Saharan Africa's human population is expected to triple, from roughly 1 billion in 2017 to 3 billion people by 2100 (Vollset et al., 2020). When Eyster, Naidoo, & Chan (2022) suggest widening the scope of ecotourism, they seem to refer to international tourism, not considering the still undeveloped domestic and intra-Africa tourism that, triggered by demographic changes, is expected to increase dramatically (Stone & Nyaupane, 2019). One can only speculate as to the consequence of these changes on ecotourism. The few studies on African domestic tourism suggest that ‘culture, livelihoods, and crowded spaces, with a variety of activities, influence domestic tourists’ gaze, whereas privacy, tranquility, and quietness influence the international tourists' gaze’ (Stone & Nyaupane, 2019). Ecotourism targeting the diaspora market, with, for example, over a million visitors to Ethiopia in 2022 alone, has received even less attention, and one wonders what its ‘ecotourism gaze’ may look like.

Ecotourism in Africa, based on international and increasingly domestic visitors, is expected to continue playing an important role for protected areas and the neighboring communities (Hausmann et al., 2016; Sabuhoro et al., 2017; Eyster, Naidoo, & Chan, 2022; Gupta et al., 2023). Taking into account regional perspectives and the rapid changes, including security and demographic, that many regions in the sub-Saharan Africa undergo, allows research and practice to cater for how ecotourism in this part of the world may develop over the decades to come.

Abstract Image

超越五巨头和鸟类:快速变化的非洲不同的生态旅游观点
生态旅游越来越被认为是保护区及其周边社区的重要收入来源(Hausmann et al., 2016;Eyster, Naidoo, & Chan, 2022;Gupta et al., 2023)。特别是在非洲南部和东部,生态旅游与具有魅力的物种“五大”有关,即非洲象(Loxodonta africana)、犀牛(Diceros bicornis, Ceratotherius simum)、狮子(Panthera leo)、非洲水牛(Syncerus caffer)和豹(Panthera pardus)。在“不仅仅是五大:非洲生态游客更喜欢充满鸟类多样性的公园”中,Eyster, Naidoo, & Chan(2022)展示了生态游客如何重视观鸟和观赏其他野生动物。也可以找到基于当地文化的生态旅游倡议(Hausmann et al., 2016)。最近的研究表明,从长远来看,像重新引入五大物种这样消耗稀缺预算的主流保护干预措施,可能会更有效地针对其他景点——鸟类、文化(Mbaiwa, 2015)。这对生物多样性保护以及旅游业如何使撒哈拉以南非洲的当地经济受益具有重要意义(Mbaiwa, 2015;Gupta et al., 2023)。Eyster, Naidoo, & Chan(2022)明确提到了他们对南部非洲和东非(SSE)的关注,这是一种非常常见的区域视角(Bauer等人,2020)。作者选择的“五大选择”——长颈鹿(Giraffa spp.)、猎豹(Acinonyx jubatus)、野狗(Lycaon pictus)、鸟类——仅限于热带草原物种,从而忽略了非洲森林物种,如山地大猩猩(gorilla beringei)和黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes),它们是卢旺达、乌干达等地蓬勃发展的生态旅游业的支柱(Sabuhoro et al., 2017)。这也适用于以低地大猩猩(大猩猩)(喀麦隆、中非共和国、加蓬)和埃塞俄比亚山地特有物种如瓦利亚野山羊(Capra walie)和山地尼亚拉(Tragelaphus buxtoni)为目标的新兴生态旅游。2019冠状病毒病是一个警钟,表明非洲及其他地区过于依赖生态旅游,这是一个很容易忘记的教训(Gupta et al., 2023)。近十年来,非洲中西部之角(WCH)安全局势恶化的后果鲜为人知(Bauer et al., 2020)。Eyster, Naidoo, & Chan(2022)提出的年度生态旅游访问地图的WCH部分自2007年以来已经转变,除了西部沿海部分,完全是红色或橙色,即(正式)建议不要旅行,取消旅行保险政策(图1)。在WCH非洲,曾经繁荣的生态旅游景点,如Waza国家公园(喀麦隆)已经崩溃,只有战利品狩猎在该地区保持(Scholte, 2021;Scholte et al., 2022)。撒哈拉以南非洲地区的人口预计将增加两倍,从2017年的约10亿人增加到2100年的30亿人(Vollset et al., 2020)。当Eyster, Naidoo, & Chan(2022)建议扩大生态旅游的范围时,他们似乎指的是国际旅游,而没有考虑到由人口变化引发的仍未开发的国内和非洲内部旅游,这些旅游预计将大幅增加(Stone & Nyaupane, 2019)。人们只能推测这些变化对生态旅游的影响。少数关于非洲国内旅游的研究表明,“文化、生计和拥挤的空间,以及各种各样的活动,影响着国内游客的目光,而隐私、宁静和安静影响着国际游客的目光”(Stone & Nyaupane, 2019)。例如,仅2022年就有超过100万游客前往埃塞俄比亚,针对侨民市场的生态旅游受到的关注就更少了,人们想知道它的“生态旅游目光”会是什么样子。以国际游客和越来越多的国内游客为基础的非洲生态旅游,预计将继续在保护区和邻近地区发挥重要作用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Animal Conservation
Animal Conservation 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Animal Conservation provides a forum for rapid publication of novel, peer-reviewed research into the conservation of animal species and their habitats. The focus is on rigorous quantitative studies of an empirical or theoretical nature, which may relate to populations, species or communities and their conservation. We encourage the submission of single-species papers that have clear broader implications for conservation of other species or systems. A central theme is to publish important new ideas of broad interest and with findings that advance the scientific basis of conservation. Subjects covered include population biology, epidemiology, evolutionary ecology, population genetics, biodiversity, biogeography, palaeobiology and conservation economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信