If crime is not the problem, crime fighting is no solution: policing gang violence in the age of abolition

IF 0.7 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
E. Hellemont, James A. Densley
{"title":"If crime is not the problem, crime fighting is no solution: policing gang violence in the age of abolition","authors":"E. Hellemont, James A. Densley","doi":"10.1108/jacpr-12-2020-0561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nIn their 1999 classic, Crime is Not the Problem, Zimring and Hawkins changed the way criminologists thought about crime and violence simply by forcing us to distinguish between them. In so doing, they advanced an agenda for a more effective response to the real “crime” problem in America – violence. In this short commentary, the authors apply this logic to gang research and responses. The authors argue police fall short in responding to “gangs” because researchers and policymakers have defined them in terms of criminal behaviour writ large, not the problem that really needs policing – the precise social and spatial dynamics of gang violence. The purpose of this paper is to stand on the shoulders of others who have stated violence trumps gangs when it comes to policy and practice and provide a conceptual review of the literature that captures mainstream and critical perspectives on gangs and offers both sides some common ground to start from as they contemplate “policing” gangs with or without police.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA review of the extant literature.\n\n\nFindings\nThe authors stand on the shoulders of others who have stated violence trumps gangs when it comes to policy and practice, to provide a conceptual review of the literature that captures mainstream and critical perspectives on gangs, in North American and European contexts, and offers both sides some common ground to start from as they contemplate “policing” gangs with or without police.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe paper is a conceptual piece looking at policing gang violence versus gang crime. The paper aims to restart the debate around the role of crime in gangs and gangs in crime. This debate centres around whether gangs should be understood as primarily criminal groups, whether “the gang” is to blame for the crime and violence of its members and what feature of collective crime and violence designate “gangness”. We use that debate to reflect past and current police practices towards gangs.\n","PeriodicalId":45499,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aggression Conflict and Peace Research","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aggression Conflict and Peace Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jacpr-12-2020-0561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose In their 1999 classic, Crime is Not the Problem, Zimring and Hawkins changed the way criminologists thought about crime and violence simply by forcing us to distinguish between them. In so doing, they advanced an agenda for a more effective response to the real “crime” problem in America – violence. In this short commentary, the authors apply this logic to gang research and responses. The authors argue police fall short in responding to “gangs” because researchers and policymakers have defined them in terms of criminal behaviour writ large, not the problem that really needs policing – the precise social and spatial dynamics of gang violence. The purpose of this paper is to stand on the shoulders of others who have stated violence trumps gangs when it comes to policy and practice and provide a conceptual review of the literature that captures mainstream and critical perspectives on gangs and offers both sides some common ground to start from as they contemplate “policing” gangs with or without police. Design/methodology/approach A review of the extant literature. Findings The authors stand on the shoulders of others who have stated violence trumps gangs when it comes to policy and practice, to provide a conceptual review of the literature that captures mainstream and critical perspectives on gangs, in North American and European contexts, and offers both sides some common ground to start from as they contemplate “policing” gangs with or without police. Originality/value The paper is a conceptual piece looking at policing gang violence versus gang crime. The paper aims to restart the debate around the role of crime in gangs and gangs in crime. This debate centres around whether gangs should be understood as primarily criminal groups, whether “the gang” is to blame for the crime and violence of its members and what feature of collective crime and violence designate “gangness”. We use that debate to reflect past and current police practices towards gangs.
如果犯罪不是问题所在,那么打击犯罪就不是解决方案:在废除奴隶制的时代维持帮派暴力
齐姆林和霍金斯在他们1999年的经典著作《犯罪不是问题》中,仅仅通过强迫我们区分犯罪和暴力,就改变了犯罪学家对犯罪和暴力的看法。在这样做的过程中,他们推进了一项议程,以更有效地应对美国真正的“犯罪”问题——暴力。在这篇简短的评论中,作者将这一逻辑应用于帮派研究和回应。这组作者认为,警察在应对“帮派”方面做得不够,因为研究人员和政策制定者已经从犯罪行为的角度来定义它们,而不是真正需要警察的问题——帮派暴力的精确的社会和空间动态。本文的目的是站在其他人的肩膀上,当涉及到政策和实践时,暴力胜过帮派,并提供对文献的概念性回顾,这些文献抓住了关于帮派的主流和批判性观点,并为双方在考虑有或没有警察的“监管”帮派时提供了一些共同点。设计/方法/方法对现有文献的回顾。作者站在其他人的肩膀上,当涉及到政策和实践时,暴力胜过帮派,提供了一个概念性的文献综述,这些文献抓住了北美和欧洲背景下帮派的主流和批判性观点,并为双方在考虑有或没有警察的“监管”帮派时提供了一些共同点。原创性/价值这篇论文是一篇概念性的文章,着眼于治安团伙暴力与帮派犯罪。本文旨在重新开始关于犯罪在帮派中的作用和帮派在犯罪中的作用的辩论。这场争论的中心是帮派是否应该被理解为主要的犯罪集团,“帮派”是否应该为其成员的犯罪和暴力负责,以及集体犯罪和暴力的哪些特征可以指定“帮派”。我们利用这场辩论来反思过去和现在警察对待帮派的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信