Hybrid Exoscopic and Robotic Transoral Removal of a Bilateral Hilar Submandibular Stone: Technical Note and Review of the Literature

Surgeries Pub Date : 2023-05-18 DOI:10.3390/surgeries4020025
G. Cammaroto, Francesco Moretti, G. Meccariello, C. Chiesa-Estomba, C. Vicini, P. Capaccio
{"title":"Hybrid Exoscopic and Robotic Transoral Removal of a Bilateral Hilar Submandibular Stone: Technical Note and Review of the Literature","authors":"G. Cammaroto, Francesco Moretti, G. Meccariello, C. Chiesa-Estomba, C. Vicini, P. Capaccio","doi":"10.3390/surgeries4020025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Submandibular gland sialolithiasis can be addressed by gland removal or by stone removal. Intraoral stone removal has now become the go-to technique to minimize aesthetic and functional sequelae (e.g., marginalis mandibulae injury, visible surgery scar) and, although traditional techniques were first experimented with (intraoral ducotomy), newer techniques drew the interest of the scientific community: sialoendoscopy, TORS-S (TransOral Robotic Surgery Assisted–Sialolithotomy) and VITOM-guided sialolithotomy. In this article, we compare the two newest transoral techniques for transoral sialolithotomy, TORS-S and 3D-4K VITOM-guided sialolithotomy, used to treat bilateral hilar submandibular gland sialolithiasis in the same patient, one technique for each side. Using these techniques, a faster recovery is achievable with almost no anatomical and/or functional sequelae, since they both allow better visualization and manipulation of soft tissues and noble structures (e.g., lingual nerve and Wharton’s duct) and make surgery easier and safer. Moreover, OR staff can better perceive surgical steps and be involved in the procedure, thus showing the high educational and training potential of these technologies.","PeriodicalId":93623,"journal":{"name":"Surgeries","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgeries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries4020025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Submandibular gland sialolithiasis can be addressed by gland removal or by stone removal. Intraoral stone removal has now become the go-to technique to minimize aesthetic and functional sequelae (e.g., marginalis mandibulae injury, visible surgery scar) and, although traditional techniques were first experimented with (intraoral ducotomy), newer techniques drew the interest of the scientific community: sialoendoscopy, TORS-S (TransOral Robotic Surgery Assisted–Sialolithotomy) and VITOM-guided sialolithotomy. In this article, we compare the two newest transoral techniques for transoral sialolithotomy, TORS-S and 3D-4K VITOM-guided sialolithotomy, used to treat bilateral hilar submandibular gland sialolithiasis in the same patient, one technique for each side. Using these techniques, a faster recovery is achievable with almost no anatomical and/or functional sequelae, since they both allow better visualization and manipulation of soft tissues and noble structures (e.g., lingual nerve and Wharton’s duct) and make surgery easier and safer. Moreover, OR staff can better perceive surgical steps and be involved in the procedure, thus showing the high educational and training potential of these technologies.
经口外窥镜和机器人联合去除双侧门下颌骨:技术注释和文献综述
颌下腺涎石症可以通过腺体切除或结石切除来解决。目前,口腔内结石清除已成为减少美学和功能后遗症(如下颌缘损伤、可见手术疤痕)的首选技术,尽管传统技术(口腔内导管切开术)首次被实验,但较新的技术引起了科学界的兴趣:唾液内窥镜、TORS-S(经口机器人手术辅助唾液取石术)和vitom引导的唾液取石术。在本文中,我们比较了两种最新的经口唾液取石术,TORS-S和3D-4K vitom引导下的唾液取石术,用于治疗同一患者的双侧门下颌骨下腺唾液结石,每侧一种技术。使用这些技术,可以实现更快的恢复,几乎没有解剖和/或功能后遗症,因为它们既可以更好地观察和操作软组织和重要结构(例如舌神经和沃顿氏管),又使手术更容易、更安全。此外,手术室工作人员可以更好地感知手术步骤并参与手术过程,从而显示出这些技术的高教育和培训潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信