Within-individual covariation masks an among-individual performance tradeoff in the prairie lizard

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
K. L. Lang, M. E. Gifford
{"title":"Within-individual covariation masks an among-individual performance tradeoff in the prairie lizard","authors":"K. L. Lang,&nbsp;M. E. Gifford","doi":"10.1111/jzo.13104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To understand fitness consequences of performance, one must determine how underlying physiological traits result in and constrain performance. Biochemical and mechanistic investment in a performance trait may cause decreased performance elsewhere: a performance tradeoff, indicating performance specialization in a population. (Co)variation exists within individuals, and among individuals, populations, and species. Conflicting patterns of among-individual and within-individual covariation may eliminate, or mask, the relationship at the phenotypic level. Multivariate mixed-effects models (MMMs) model within-individual and among-individual variation separately. We used MMMs to test for relationships between physiological and performance traits associated with locomotion in the prairie lizard <i>Sceloporus consobrinus</i>, and tested for tradeoffs at multiple hierarchical levels. We then compared these results to the conventional Pearson correlations. We found a significant among-individual tradeoff between endurance and climbing speed. Positive covariation within individuals masked the tradeoff at the phenotypic level. Sprint speed positively covaried with climbing speed. Excluding anaerobic scope, which was associated with endurance, no measured physiological traits were predictive of locomotor performance. These data indicate that performance specialization exists among prairie lizards and contribute to a growing body of literature that have successfully used MMMs to uncover performance tradeoffs which may have been masked using conventional methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jzo.13104","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To understand fitness consequences of performance, one must determine how underlying physiological traits result in and constrain performance. Biochemical and mechanistic investment in a performance trait may cause decreased performance elsewhere: a performance tradeoff, indicating performance specialization in a population. (Co)variation exists within individuals, and among individuals, populations, and species. Conflicting patterns of among-individual and within-individual covariation may eliminate, or mask, the relationship at the phenotypic level. Multivariate mixed-effects models (MMMs) model within-individual and among-individual variation separately. We used MMMs to test for relationships between physiological and performance traits associated with locomotion in the prairie lizard Sceloporus consobrinus, and tested for tradeoffs at multiple hierarchical levels. We then compared these results to the conventional Pearson correlations. We found a significant among-individual tradeoff between endurance and climbing speed. Positive covariation within individuals masked the tradeoff at the phenotypic level. Sprint speed positively covaried with climbing speed. Excluding anaerobic scope, which was associated with endurance, no measured physiological traits were predictive of locomotor performance. These data indicate that performance specialization exists among prairie lizards and contribute to a growing body of literature that have successfully used MMMs to uncover performance tradeoffs which may have been masked using conventional methods.

Abstract Image

个体内协变量掩盖了草原蜥蜴个体间的绩效权衡
为了理解表现的适应性后果,必须确定潜在的生理特征是如何导致和限制表现的。对某一绩效特征的生化和机械化投资可能会导致其他方面的绩效下降:绩效权衡,表明群体的绩效专业化。(Co)变异存在于个体内部,以及个体、种群和物种之间。个体间和个体内协变量的冲突模式可能会消除或掩盖表型水平上的关系。多变量混合效应模型(MMM)分别模拟个体内和个体间的变化。我们使用MMM测试了草原蜥蜴Sceloporus consobrinus与运动相关的生理和性能特征之间的关系,并在多个层次上测试了权衡。然后,我们将这些结果与传统的皮尔逊相关性进行了比较。我们发现耐力和攀登速度之间存在显著的个体间权衡。个体内的正协变量掩盖了表型水平上的权衡。短跑速度与爬坡速度呈正相关。除了与耐力相关的无氧范围外,没有任何测量的生理特征可以预测运动表现。这些数据表明,草原蜥蜴存在性能专门化,并为越来越多的文献做出了贡献,这些文献成功地使用MMM来揭示性能权衡,而这些权衡可能已经使用传统方法掩盖了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信