Hospital Variation in Mortality and Failure to Rescue after Surgery for High-Risk Neonatal Diagnoses.

Neonatology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-16 DOI:10.1159/000533825
Steven C Mehl, Jorge I Portuondo, Yao Tian, Mehul V Raval, Alice King, Kristy L Rialon, Adam M Vogel, David E Wesson, Sohail R Shah, Nader N Massarweh
{"title":"Hospital Variation in Mortality and Failure to Rescue after Surgery for High-Risk Neonatal Diagnoses.","authors":"Steven C Mehl, Jorge I Portuondo, Yao Tian, Mehul V Raval, Alice King, Kristy L Rialon, Adam M Vogel, David E Wesson, Sohail R Shah, Nader N Massarweh","doi":"10.1159/000533825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A large proportion of postoperative mortality after pediatric surgery occurs among neonates with specific high-risk diagnoses. The extent to which there is hospital-level mortality variation among patients with these diagnoses and whether this variation is associated with differences in failure to rescue (FTR) is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Pediatric Health Information System® database (2012-2020) was used to identify patients who underwent surgery for eight high-risk neonatal diagnoses: gastroschisis; volvulus; necrotizing enterocolitis; intestinal atresia; meconium peritonitis; tracheoesophageal fistula; congenital diaphragmatic hernia; and perinatal intestinal perforation. Hospitals were stratified into tertiles of reliability-adjusted inpatient mortality rates (lower than average mortality - tertile 1 [T1]; higher than average mortality - tertile 3 [T3]). Multivariable hierarchical regression was used to evaluate the association between hospital-level, reliability-adjusted mortality and FTR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 20,838 infants were identified across 48 academic, pediatric hospitals. Adjusted hospital mortality rates ranged from 4.0% (95% CI, 0.0-8.2) to 16.3% (12.2-20.4). Median case volume (range, 80-1,238) and number of NICU beds (range, 24-126) were not significantly different across hospital tertiles. Compared to the hospitals with the lowest postoperative mortality (T1), the odds of FTR were significantly higher in hospitals with the highest (T3) postoperative mortality (odds ratio 1.97 [1.50-2.59]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant variation in neonatal hospital mortality for high-risk diagnoses does not appear to be explained by hospital structural characteristics. Rather, difference in FTR suggests quality improvement interventions targeting early recognition and management of postoperative complications could improve surgical quality and safety for high-risk neonatal care.</p>","PeriodicalId":94152,"journal":{"name":"Neonatology","volume":" ","pages":"34-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000533825","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: A large proportion of postoperative mortality after pediatric surgery occurs among neonates with specific high-risk diagnoses. The extent to which there is hospital-level mortality variation among patients with these diagnoses and whether this variation is associated with differences in failure to rescue (FTR) is unclear.

Methods: The Pediatric Health Information System® database (2012-2020) was used to identify patients who underwent surgery for eight high-risk neonatal diagnoses: gastroschisis; volvulus; necrotizing enterocolitis; intestinal atresia; meconium peritonitis; tracheoesophageal fistula; congenital diaphragmatic hernia; and perinatal intestinal perforation. Hospitals were stratified into tertiles of reliability-adjusted inpatient mortality rates (lower than average mortality - tertile 1 [T1]; higher than average mortality - tertile 3 [T3]). Multivariable hierarchical regression was used to evaluate the association between hospital-level, reliability-adjusted mortality and FTR.

Results: Overall, 20,838 infants were identified across 48 academic, pediatric hospitals. Adjusted hospital mortality rates ranged from 4.0% (95% CI, 0.0-8.2) to 16.3% (12.2-20.4). Median case volume (range, 80-1,238) and number of NICU beds (range, 24-126) were not significantly different across hospital tertiles. Compared to the hospitals with the lowest postoperative mortality (T1), the odds of FTR were significantly higher in hospitals with the highest (T3) postoperative mortality (odds ratio 1.97 [1.50-2.59]).

Conclusions: Significant variation in neonatal hospital mortality for high-risk diagnoses does not appear to be explained by hospital structural characteristics. Rather, difference in FTR suggests quality improvement interventions targeting early recognition and management of postoperative complications could improve surgical quality and safety for high-risk neonatal care.

高危新生儿手术后死亡率和抢救失败的医院差异。
引言:儿科手术后的术后死亡率很大一部分发生在有特定高危诊断的新生儿中。在这些诊断的患者中,医院级别的死亡率差异的程度以及这种差异是否与抢救失败(FTR)的差异有关尚不清楚。方法:使用儿科健康信息系统®数据库(2012-2020)来确定因八种高危新生儿诊断而接受手术的患者:腹裂;扭转;坏死性小肠结肠炎;肠道闭锁;胎粪性腹膜炎;气管食管瘘;先天性膈疝;以及围产期肠穿孔。医院被分为经可靠性调整的住院死亡率的三分位数(低于平均死亡率三分位数1[T1];高于平均死亡率三等分位数3[T3])。使用多变量分层回归来评估医院水平、可靠性调整死亡率和FTR之间的关系。结果:总体而言,在48家学术和儿科医院中发现了20838名婴儿。调整后的医院死亡率从4.0%(95%CI,0.0-8.2)到16.3%(12.2-20.4)不等。中位病例数(范围,80-1238)和新生儿重症监护病房床位(范围,24-126)在医院三分位数之间没有显著差异。与术后死亡率最低的医院(T1)相比,术后死亡率最高的医院(T3)发生FTR的几率显著更高(比值比1.97[1.50-2.59])。结论:高危诊断的新生儿住院死亡率的显著差异似乎不能用医院结构特征来解释。相反,FTR的差异表明,针对术后并发症的早期识别和管理的质量改进干预措施可以提高高危新生儿护理的手术质量和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信