Loneliness and Its Predictors in Rare Versus Common Chronic Illnesses.

IF 2 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Jennifer Nicoloro-SantaBarbara, Marci Lobel
{"title":"Loneliness and Its Predictors in Rare Versus Common Chronic Illnesses.","authors":"Jennifer Nicoloro-SantaBarbara, Marci Lobel","doi":"10.1007/s12529-023-10231-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Loneliness is a growing public health concern associated with substantial negative mental and physical health outcomes. Loneliness is especially relevant for individuals with a chronic illness, perhaps more so if their illness is rare. Little is known about the psychosocial experience of individuals with a rare chronic illness, and whether and how it may differ from the experience of individuals with common chronic illnesses. We compared the magnitude of loneliness in persons with a rare or common chronic illness and examined theoretically guided predictors of loneliness as follows: stigma, illness intrusiveness, social comparison, social support, support from healthcare providers, and self-efficacy.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Individuals with a chronic illness (common or rare) completed an anonymous online survey (N = 952).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individuals with common chronic illnesses were as lonely as those with a rare chronic illness. Loneliness in both groups was higher than that in population norms. Regression analyses reveal that independent of other predictors, loneliness was especially high among people who feel stigmatized by others, those who have less social support available, and people whose functioning is more disrupted by their illness (all p values < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The similarity of loneliness in these groups reinforces the value of further systematic research to identify the needs of individuals with any type of chronic illness. Study findings highlight the importance of examining internalized stigma and social support as possible targets of intervention to reduce loneliness among individuals with a chronic illness, recognizing some of the unique features and challenges of their disorders, whether common or rare.</p>","PeriodicalId":54208,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Behavioral Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-023-10231-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Loneliness is a growing public health concern associated with substantial negative mental and physical health outcomes. Loneliness is especially relevant for individuals with a chronic illness, perhaps more so if their illness is rare. Little is known about the psychosocial experience of individuals with a rare chronic illness, and whether and how it may differ from the experience of individuals with common chronic illnesses. We compared the magnitude of loneliness in persons with a rare or common chronic illness and examined theoretically guided predictors of loneliness as follows: stigma, illness intrusiveness, social comparison, social support, support from healthcare providers, and self-efficacy.

Method: Individuals with a chronic illness (common or rare) completed an anonymous online survey (N = 952).

Results: Individuals with common chronic illnesses were as lonely as those with a rare chronic illness. Loneliness in both groups was higher than that in population norms. Regression analyses reveal that independent of other predictors, loneliness was especially high among people who feel stigmatized by others, those who have less social support available, and people whose functioning is more disrupted by their illness (all p values < 0.01).

Conclusion: The similarity of loneliness in these groups reinforces the value of further systematic research to identify the needs of individuals with any type of chronic illness. Study findings highlight the importance of examining internalized stigma and social support as possible targets of intervention to reduce loneliness among individuals with a chronic illness, recognizing some of the unique features and challenges of their disorders, whether common or rare.

罕见病与常见慢性病的孤独感及其预测因素。
背景:孤独感是一种日益严重的公共卫生问题,与严重的负面身心健康后果有关。孤独感对患有慢性病的人来说尤其重要,如果他们的疾病很罕见,可能更重要。对于罕见慢性病患者的心理社会体验,以及它是否以及如何与常见慢性病患者不同,我们知之甚少。我们比较了罕见或常见慢性病患者的孤独程度,并检验了以下理论指导下的孤独预测因素:污名、疾病侵扰、社会比较、社会支持、医疗保健提供者的支持和自我效能。方法:慢性病(常见或罕见)患者完成了一项匿名在线调查(N = 结果:患有常见慢性病的个体和患有罕见慢性病的人一样孤独。两组的孤独感均高于正常人群。回归分析显示,独立于其他预测因素,孤独感在那些感到被他人污名化的人、那些社会支持较少的人以及那些功能更受疾病干扰的人中尤其高(所有p值 结论:这些群体中孤独感的相似性加强了进一步系统研究的价值,以确定任何类型慢性病患者的需求。研究结果强调了将内化的污名和社会支持作为干预的可能目标的重要性,以减少慢性病患者的孤独感,认识到他们的疾病的一些独特特征和挑战,无论是常见的还是罕见的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Behavioral Medicine (IJBM) is the official scientific journal of the International Society for Behavioral Medicine (ISBM). IJBM seeks to present the best theoretically-driven, evidence-based work in the field of behavioral medicine from around the globe. IJBM embraces multiple theoretical perspectives, research methodologies, groups of interest, and levels of analysis. The journal is interested in research across the broad spectrum of behavioral medicine, including health-behavior relationships, the prevention of illness and the promotion of health, the effects of illness on the self and others, the effectiveness of novel interventions, identification of biobehavioral mechanisms, and the influence of social factors on health. We welcome experimental, non-experimental, quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies as well as implementation and dissemination research, integrative reviews, and meta-analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信