Efficacy of telemedicine-based antimicrobial stewardship program to combat antimicrobial resistance: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-17 DOI:10.1177/1357633X231204919
Valerie J Dirjayanto, Gilbert Lazarus, Priscilla Geraldine, Nathaniel G Dyson, Stella K Triastari, Jasmine V Anjani, Nayla Kp Wisnu, Adrianus J Sugiharta
{"title":"Efficacy of telemedicine-based antimicrobial stewardship program to combat antimicrobial resistance: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Valerie J Dirjayanto, Gilbert Lazarus, Priscilla Geraldine, Nathaniel G Dyson, Stella K Triastari, Jasmine V Anjani, Nayla Kp Wisnu, Adrianus J Sugiharta","doi":"10.1177/1357633X231204919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionAntimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major public health threat. Improving antimicrobial use is the main strategy against AMR, but it is challenging to implement especially in low-resource settings. Thus, this review aims to explore the efficacy of telehealth-based antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP), which is more accessible.MethodsRegistered to PROSPERO and following PRISMA guidelines, literature search was performed in databases including PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, Science Direct, EBSCOhost, EMBASE, and Google Scholar, searching for studies implementing telehealth ASP. Critical appraisal of studies was performed using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for Cohort Studies (NOS), Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool (RoB) 2.0, and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I). We utilized inverse variance, random effects model to obtain the pooled odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) estimates, as well as sensitivity and subgroup analysis.Results and DiscussionThe search yielded 14 studies. Telehealth-based ASP was associated with better adherence to guidelines (pooled OR: 2.78 [95%CI:1.29-5.99], p = 0.009; I2 = 93%), within which streamlining yielded better odds (pooled OR: 30.54 [95%CI:10.42-89.52], p < 0.001) more than the compliance with policy subgroup (pooled OR: 1.60 [95%CI:1.02-2.51], p = 0.04). The odds of antimicrobial prescription rate reduced significantly (pooled OR: 0.60 [95%CI:0.42-0.85], p = 0.005; I2 = 94%), especially for the lower respiratory infection subgroup (pooled OR: 0.37 [95%CI:0.28-0.49], p < 0.001). Days of therapy decreased (pooled MD: -47.12 [95%CI: -85.78- -8.46], p = 0.02; I2 = 100%), with the greatest effect in acute care settings (pooled MD: -97.73 [95%CI:-147.48-47.97], p = 0.0001). Mortality did not change significantly (pooled OR: 1.20 [95%CI:0.69-2.10], p = 0.52; I2 = 63%).ConclusionTelehealth-based ASP was proven beneficial to increase adherence to guideline and reduce prescription rates, without significantly affecting patient clinical outcome. After further studies, we recommend more widespread use of telemedicine to combat AMR.</p>","PeriodicalId":50024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","volume":" ","pages":"615-627"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12095883/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X231204919","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionAntimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major public health threat. Improving antimicrobial use is the main strategy against AMR, but it is challenging to implement especially in low-resource settings. Thus, this review aims to explore the efficacy of telehealth-based antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP), which is more accessible.MethodsRegistered to PROSPERO and following PRISMA guidelines, literature search was performed in databases including PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, Science Direct, EBSCOhost, EMBASE, and Google Scholar, searching for studies implementing telehealth ASP. Critical appraisal of studies was performed using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for Cohort Studies (NOS), Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool (RoB) 2.0, and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I). We utilized inverse variance, random effects model to obtain the pooled odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) estimates, as well as sensitivity and subgroup analysis.Results and DiscussionThe search yielded 14 studies. Telehealth-based ASP was associated with better adherence to guidelines (pooled OR: 2.78 [95%CI:1.29-5.99], p = 0.009; I2 = 93%), within which streamlining yielded better odds (pooled OR: 30.54 [95%CI:10.42-89.52], p < 0.001) more than the compliance with policy subgroup (pooled OR: 1.60 [95%CI:1.02-2.51], p = 0.04). The odds of antimicrobial prescription rate reduced significantly (pooled OR: 0.60 [95%CI:0.42-0.85], p = 0.005; I2 = 94%), especially for the lower respiratory infection subgroup (pooled OR: 0.37 [95%CI:0.28-0.49], p < 0.001). Days of therapy decreased (pooled MD: -47.12 [95%CI: -85.78- -8.46], p = 0.02; I2 = 100%), with the greatest effect in acute care settings (pooled MD: -97.73 [95%CI:-147.48-47.97], p = 0.0001). Mortality did not change significantly (pooled OR: 1.20 [95%CI:0.69-2.10], p = 0.52; I2 = 63%).ConclusionTelehealth-based ASP was proven beneficial to increase adherence to guideline and reduce prescription rates, without significantly affecting patient clinical outcome. After further studies, we recommend more widespread use of telemedicine to combat AMR.

基于远程医疗的抗菌药物管理计划对抗抗菌药物耐药性的疗效:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
引言:抗微生物耐药性(AMR)是一个主要的公共健康威胁。改善抗菌药物的使用是对抗AMR的主要策略,但实施起来很有挑战性,尤其是在资源匮乏的环境中。因此,本综述旨在探索基于远程医疗的抗菌管理计划(ASP)的疗效,该计划更容易获得。方法:在PROSPERO注册并遵循PRISMA指南,在PubMed、Scopus、Cochrane、Science Direct、EBSCOhost、EMBASE和Google Scholar等数据库中进行文献检索,检索实施远程医疗ASP的研究。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华队列研究量表(NOS)、Cochrane偏倚风险工具(RoB)2.0和非随机干预研究中的偏倚风险(ROBINS-I)对研究进行批判性评估。我们利用逆方差、随机效应模型来获得合并优势比(OR)和平均差(MD)估计,以及敏感性和亚组分析。结果和讨论:搜索产生了14项研究。基于远程健康的ASP与更好地遵守指南相关(合并OR:2.78[95%CI:1.29-5.99],p = 0.009;I2 = 93%),其中精简产生更好的几率(合并OR:30.54[95%CI:10.42-89.52],p 结论:基于远程健康的ASP被证明有利于提高对指南的遵守率和降低处方率,而不会显著影响患者的临床结果。经过进一步研究,我们建议更广泛地使用远程医疗来对抗AMR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare provides excellent peer reviewed coverage of developments in telemedicine and e-health and is now widely recognised as the leading journal in its field. Contributions from around the world provide a unique perspective on how different countries and health systems are using new technology in health care. Sections within the journal include technology updates, editorials, original articles, research tutorials, educational material, review articles and reports from various telemedicine organisations. A subscription to this journal will help you to stay up-to-date in this fast moving and growing area of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信