Strategies for closing the posterior rectus sheath during enhanced view totally extraperitoneal Rives-Stoppa repair.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Journal of Minimal Access Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-14 DOI:10.4103/jmas.jmas_177_23
Sarfaraz Jalil Baig, Jignesh A Gandhi, Aarsh P Gajjar, Pallawi Priya, Devashree Sane
{"title":"Strategies for closing the posterior rectus sheath during enhanced view totally extraperitoneal Rives-Stoppa repair.","authors":"Sarfaraz Jalil Baig, Jignesh A Gandhi, Aarsh P Gajjar, Pallawi Priya, Devashree Sane","doi":"10.4103/jmas.jmas_177_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The popularity of endolaparoscopic extraperitoneal repairs has been on the rise due to advantages such as sublay mesh placement and early return to daily activities. However, the procedure requires overcoming a learning curve, and with increased adoption, new complications have emerged. One significant complication is the rupture of the posterior rectus sheath (PRS). In this article, we present our modifications of the technique to reduce tension during PRS closure.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The study included 105 patients who underwent endolaparoscopic extraperitoneal repairs for ventral hernias using two different techniques. Group A ( n = 68) underwent the original technique, whereas Group B ( n = 37) underwent the modified technique. The modifications in Group B included preserving the peritoneal bridge between the two PRS and the hernia sac, conducting a complete dissection of the space of Bogros and adopting a transverse or oblique closure of PRS along the lines of least tension. To assess the efficacy of these modifications in preventing PRS rupture, we compared the results of both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings indicate that following all the technical steps of the modified technique resulted in a reduced need for transversus abdominis release for PRS closure and a lower incidence of PRS rupture in the postoperative period. However, to further validate the effectiveness of these modifications, a larger follow-up period and a bigger sample size are required.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The adoption of the modified technique can help achieve a tension-free PRS closure.</p>","PeriodicalId":48905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"387-392"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11601971/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_177_23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The popularity of endolaparoscopic extraperitoneal repairs has been on the rise due to advantages such as sublay mesh placement and early return to daily activities. However, the procedure requires overcoming a learning curve, and with increased adoption, new complications have emerged. One significant complication is the rupture of the posterior rectus sheath (PRS). In this article, we present our modifications of the technique to reduce tension during PRS closure.

Patients and methods: The study included 105 patients who underwent endolaparoscopic extraperitoneal repairs for ventral hernias using two different techniques. Group A ( n = 68) underwent the original technique, whereas Group B ( n = 37) underwent the modified technique. The modifications in Group B included preserving the peritoneal bridge between the two PRS and the hernia sac, conducting a complete dissection of the space of Bogros and adopting a transverse or oblique closure of PRS along the lines of least tension. To assess the efficacy of these modifications in preventing PRS rupture, we compared the results of both groups.

Results: Our findings indicate that following all the technical steps of the modified technique resulted in a reduced need for transversus abdominis release for PRS closure and a lower incidence of PRS rupture in the postoperative period. However, to further validate the effectiveness of these modifications, a larger follow-up period and a bigger sample size are required.

Conclusions: The adoption of the modified technique can help achieve a tension-free PRS closure.

增强型全腹膜外Rives-Stoppa修复术中闭合后直肌鞘的策略。
引言:由于腹膜下网布放置和早期恢复日常活动等优点,腹腔镜腹膜外修补术的普及率一直在上升。然而,该程序需要克服学习曲线,随着采用率的提高,出现了新的并发症。一个重要的并发症是后直肌鞘破裂。在这篇文章中,我们介绍了我们对该技术的修改,以减少PRS闭合过程中的张力。患者和方法:这项研究包括105名患者,他们使用两种不同的技术进行了腹膜外腹膜内疝修补术。A组(n=68)采用原始技术,而B组(n=37)采用改良技术。B组的改良包括保留两个PRS和疝囊之间的腹膜桥,对Bogros间隙进行完全解剖,并沿张力最小的线采用横向或斜向闭合PRS。为了评估这些修饰在预防PRS破裂方面的疗效,我们比较了两组的结果。结果:我们的研究结果表明,遵循改良技术的所有技术步骤,减少了闭合PRS的腹横肌松解需求,并降低了术后PRS破裂的发生率。然而,为了进一步验证这些修改的有效性,需要更大的随访期和更大的样本量。结论:采用改良技术有助于实现PRS无张力闭合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Minimal Access Surgery (JMAS), the official publication of Indian Association of Gastrointestinal Endo Surgeons, launched in early 2005. The JMAS, a quarterly publication, is the first English-language journal from India, as also from this part of the world, dedicated to Minimal Access Surgery. The JMAS boasts an outstanding editorial board comprising of Indian and international experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信