Quadratus Lumborum Block as a Cornerstone for Neonatal Intestinal Surgery Enhanced Recovery (ERAS): A Case Series.

IF 1.5 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Local and Regional Anesthesia Pub Date : 2023-10-10 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2147/LRA.S403567
Cassandra Hoffmann, Angela Snow, Celine Chedid, Carol Abi Shadid, Eiichi A Miyasaka
{"title":"Quadratus Lumborum Block as a Cornerstone for Neonatal Intestinal Surgery Enhanced Recovery (ERAS): A Case Series.","authors":"Cassandra Hoffmann,&nbsp;Angela Snow,&nbsp;Celine Chedid,&nbsp;Carol Abi Shadid,&nbsp;Eiichi A Miyasaka","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S403567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Neonates present unique challenges for pediatric surgical teams. To optimize outcomes, it is imperative to standardize perioperative care by using early extubation and multimodal analgesic techniques. The quadratus lumborum (QL) block provides longer duration and superior pain relief than other single-injection abdominal fascial plane techniques. The purpose of this case series was to report our initial experience with QL blocks in neonatal patients treated with intestinal ERAS.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Ten neonates requiring intestinal surgery at a single tertiary care center who received QL blocks between December 2019 and April 2022 for enhanced recovery were studied. Bilateral QL blocks were performed with 0.5 mL/kg of 0.25% ropivacaine per side with an adjuvant of 1 mcg/kg of dexmedetomidine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Gestational age at birth ranged from 32.2 to 41 weeks. The median age, weight, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score at the time of surgery was 5 days [range 7.5 hours, 60 days], 2.84 kg [range 1.5, 4.5], and 3, respectively. Bilateral QL blocks were performed without complications in all patients. Two patients were outside the neonatal range from birth to surgery, but were under 42 weeks gestational age when corrected for prematurity. All patients were extubated with well-controlled pain, and no patient required reintubation within the first 24 hours. Postoperatively, median cumulative morphine equivalents were 0.16 mg/kg [range 0, 0.79] and six patients received scheduled acetaminophen. Morphine (0.1 mg/kg) was administered to patients with a modified neonatal infant pain scale (NIPS) score greater than or equal to 4, and pain was reassessed 1 hour after administration (Appendix).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When developing intestinal ERAS protocols, Bilateral QL blocks may be considered for postoperative analgesia in the neonatal population. Further prospective studies are required to validate this approach in neonates.</p>","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":"16 ","pages":"165-171"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/98/d9/lra-16-165.PMC10576531.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S403567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Neonates present unique challenges for pediatric surgical teams. To optimize outcomes, it is imperative to standardize perioperative care by using early extubation and multimodal analgesic techniques. The quadratus lumborum (QL) block provides longer duration and superior pain relief than other single-injection abdominal fascial plane techniques. The purpose of this case series was to report our initial experience with QL blocks in neonatal patients treated with intestinal ERAS.

Patients and methods: Ten neonates requiring intestinal surgery at a single tertiary care center who received QL blocks between December 2019 and April 2022 for enhanced recovery were studied. Bilateral QL blocks were performed with 0.5 mL/kg of 0.25% ropivacaine per side with an adjuvant of 1 mcg/kg of dexmedetomidine.

Results: Gestational age at birth ranged from 32.2 to 41 weeks. The median age, weight, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score at the time of surgery was 5 days [range 7.5 hours, 60 days], 2.84 kg [range 1.5, 4.5], and 3, respectively. Bilateral QL blocks were performed without complications in all patients. Two patients were outside the neonatal range from birth to surgery, but were under 42 weeks gestational age when corrected for prematurity. All patients were extubated with well-controlled pain, and no patient required reintubation within the first 24 hours. Postoperatively, median cumulative morphine equivalents were 0.16 mg/kg [range 0, 0.79] and six patients received scheduled acetaminophen. Morphine (0.1 mg/kg) was administered to patients with a modified neonatal infant pain scale (NIPS) score greater than or equal to 4, and pain was reassessed 1 hour after administration (Appendix).

Conclusion: When developing intestinal ERAS protocols, Bilateral QL blocks may be considered for postoperative analgesia in the neonatal population. Further prospective studies are required to validate this approach in neonates.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

腰方形块作为新生儿肠道手术增强恢复(ERAS)的基石:一个病例系列。
目的:新生儿给儿科外科团队带来了独特的挑战。为了优化结果,必须通过使用早期拔管和多模式镇痛技术来规范围手术期护理。腰方肌(QL)阻滞比其他单次注射腹部筋膜平面技术提供更长的持续时间和更好的疼痛缓解。本病例系列的目的是报告我们在接受肠道ERAS治疗的新生儿患者中使用QL阻断的初步经验。患者和方法:研究了在2019年12月至2022年4月期间在一个三级护理中心接受QL阻断以增强恢复的10名需要肠道手术的新生儿。双侧QL阻断用每侧0.5 mL/kg 0.25%罗哌卡因和1 mcg/kg右美托咪定佐剂进行。结果:出生时的孕龄为32.2~41周。手术时的中位年龄、体重和美国麻醉师学会(ASA)评分分别为5天[范围7.5小时、60天]、2.84公斤[范围1.5、4.5]和3。所有患者均在无并发症的情况下进行双侧QL阻滞。两名患者从出生到手术都不在新生儿范围内,但在纠正早产时,其胎龄不到42周。所有患者都在疼痛得到良好控制的情况下拔管,没有患者需要在最初的24小时内重新插管。术后,中位累积吗啡当量为0.16 mg/kg[范围0.79],6名患者接受了预定的对乙酰氨基酚治疗。对改良新生儿疼痛量表(NIPS)评分大于或等于4的患者给予吗啡(0.1mg/kg),并在给药后1小时重新评估疼痛(附录)。结论:在制定肠道ERAS方案时,可考虑在新生儿人群中采用双侧QL阻滞进行术后镇痛。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来验证新生儿的这种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信