Effects of oral anticoagulation in people with atrial fibrillation after spontaneous intracranial haemorrhage (COCROACH): prospective, individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised trials.

IF 46.5 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Lancet Neurology Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-12 DOI:10.1016/S1474-4422(23)00315-0
Rustam Al-Shahi Salman, Jacqueline Stephen, Jayne F Tierney, Steff C Lewis, David E Newby, Adrian R Parry-Jones, Philip M White, Stuart J Connolly, Oscar R Benavente, Dar Dowlatshahi, Charlotte Cordonnier, Catherine M Viscoli, Kevin N Sheth, Hooman Kamel, Roland Veltkamp, Kristin T Larsen, Jeannette Hofmeijer, Henk Kerkhoff, Floris H B M Schreuder, Ashkan Shoamanesh, Catharina J M Klijn, H Bart van der Worp
{"title":"Effects of oral anticoagulation in people with atrial fibrillation after spontaneous intracranial haemorrhage (COCROACH): prospective, individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised trials.","authors":"Rustam Al-Shahi Salman, Jacqueline Stephen, Jayne F Tierney, Steff C Lewis, David E Newby, Adrian R Parry-Jones, Philip M White, Stuart J Connolly, Oscar R Benavente, Dar Dowlatshahi, Charlotte Cordonnier, Catherine M Viscoli, Kevin N Sheth, Hooman Kamel, Roland Veltkamp, Kristin T Larsen, Jeannette Hofmeijer, Henk Kerkhoff, Floris H B M Schreuder, Ashkan Shoamanesh, Catharina J M Klijn, H Bart van der Worp","doi":"10.1016/S1474-4422(23)00315-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The safety and efficacy of oral anticoagulation for prevention of major adverse cardiovascular events in people with atrial fibrillation and spontaneous intracranial haemorrhage are uncertain. We planned to estimate the effects of starting versus avoiding oral anticoagulation in people with spontaneous intracranial haemorrhage and atrial fibrillation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective meta-analysis, we searched bibliographic databases and trial registries using the strategies of a Cochrane systematic review (CD012144) on June 23, 2023. We included clinical trials if they were registered, randomised, and included participants with spontaneous intracranial haemorrhage and atrial fibrillation who were assigned to either start long-term use of any oral anticoagulant agent or avoid oral anticoagulation (ie, placebo, open control, another antithrombotic agent, or another intervention for the prevention of major adverse cardiovascular events). We assessed eligible trials using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. We sought data for individual participants who had not opted out of data sharing from chief investigators of completed trials, pending completion of ongoing trials in 2028. The primary outcome was any stroke or cardiovascular death. We used individual participant data to construct a Cox regression model of the time to the first occurrence of outcome events during follow-up in the intention-to-treat dataset supplied by each trial, followed by meta-analysis using a fixed-effect inverse-variance model to generate a pooled estimate of the hazard ratio (HR) with 95% CI. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021246133.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We identified four eligible trials; three were restricted to participants with atrial fibrillation and intracranial haemorrhage (SoSTART [NCT03153150], with 203 participants) or intracerebral haemorrhage (APACHE-AF [NCT02565693], with 101 participants, and NASPAF-ICH [NCT02998905], with 30 participants), and one included a subgroup of participants with previous intracranial haemorrhage (ELDERCARE-AF [NCT02801669], with 80 participants). After excluding two participants who opted out of data sharing, we included 412 participants (310 [75%] aged 75 years or older, 249 [60%] with CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc score ≤4, and 163 [40%] with CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc score >4). The intervention was a direct oral anticoagulant in 209 (99%) of 212 participants who were assigned to start oral anticoagulation, and the comparator was antiplatelet monotherapy in 67 (33%) of 200 participants assigned to avoid oral anticoagulation. The primary outcome of any stroke or cardiovascular death occurred in 29 (14%) of 212 participants who started oral anticoagulation versus 43 (22%) of 200 who avoided oral anticoagulation (pooled HR 0·68 [95% CI 0·42-1·10]; I<sup>2</sup>=0%). Oral anticoagulation reduced the risk of ischaemic major adverse cardiovascular events (nine [4%] of 212 vs 38 [19%] of 200; pooled HR 0·27 [95% CI 0·13-0·56]; I<sup>2</sup>=0%). There was no significant increase in haemorrhagic major adverse cardiovascular events (15 [7%] of 212 vs nine [5%] of 200; pooled HR 1·80 [95% CI 0·77-4·21]; I<sup>2</sup>=0%), death from any cause (38 [18%] of 212 vs 29 [15%] of 200; 1·29 [0·78-2·11]; I<sup>2</sup>=50%), or death or dependence after 1 year (78 [53%] of 147 vs 74 [51%] of 145; pooled odds ratio 1·12 [95% CI 0·70-1·79]; I<sup>2</sup>=0%).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>For people with atrial fibrillation and intracranial haemorrhage, oral anticoagulation had uncertain effects on the risk of any stroke or cardiovascular death (both overall and in subgroups), haemorrhagic major adverse cardiovascular events, and functional outcome. Oral anticoagulation reduced the risk of ischaemic major adverse cardiovascular events, which can inform clinical practice. These findings should encourage recruitment to, and completion of, ongoing trials.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>British Heart Foundation.</p>","PeriodicalId":17989,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"1140-1149"},"PeriodicalIF":46.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(23)00315-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The safety and efficacy of oral anticoagulation for prevention of major adverse cardiovascular events in people with atrial fibrillation and spontaneous intracranial haemorrhage are uncertain. We planned to estimate the effects of starting versus avoiding oral anticoagulation in people with spontaneous intracranial haemorrhage and atrial fibrillation.

Methods: In this prospective meta-analysis, we searched bibliographic databases and trial registries using the strategies of a Cochrane systematic review (CD012144) on June 23, 2023. We included clinical trials if they were registered, randomised, and included participants with spontaneous intracranial haemorrhage and atrial fibrillation who were assigned to either start long-term use of any oral anticoagulant agent or avoid oral anticoagulation (ie, placebo, open control, another antithrombotic agent, or another intervention for the prevention of major adverse cardiovascular events). We assessed eligible trials using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. We sought data for individual participants who had not opted out of data sharing from chief investigators of completed trials, pending completion of ongoing trials in 2028. The primary outcome was any stroke or cardiovascular death. We used individual participant data to construct a Cox regression model of the time to the first occurrence of outcome events during follow-up in the intention-to-treat dataset supplied by each trial, followed by meta-analysis using a fixed-effect inverse-variance model to generate a pooled estimate of the hazard ratio (HR) with 95% CI. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021246133.

Findings: We identified four eligible trials; three were restricted to participants with atrial fibrillation and intracranial haemorrhage (SoSTART [NCT03153150], with 203 participants) or intracerebral haemorrhage (APACHE-AF [NCT02565693], with 101 participants, and NASPAF-ICH [NCT02998905], with 30 participants), and one included a subgroup of participants with previous intracranial haemorrhage (ELDERCARE-AF [NCT02801669], with 80 participants). After excluding two participants who opted out of data sharing, we included 412 participants (310 [75%] aged 75 years or older, 249 [60%] with CHA2DS2-VASc score ≤4, and 163 [40%] with CHA2DS2-VASc score >4). The intervention was a direct oral anticoagulant in 209 (99%) of 212 participants who were assigned to start oral anticoagulation, and the comparator was antiplatelet monotherapy in 67 (33%) of 200 participants assigned to avoid oral anticoagulation. The primary outcome of any stroke or cardiovascular death occurred in 29 (14%) of 212 participants who started oral anticoagulation versus 43 (22%) of 200 who avoided oral anticoagulation (pooled HR 0·68 [95% CI 0·42-1·10]; I2=0%). Oral anticoagulation reduced the risk of ischaemic major adverse cardiovascular events (nine [4%] of 212 vs 38 [19%] of 200; pooled HR 0·27 [95% CI 0·13-0·56]; I2=0%). There was no significant increase in haemorrhagic major adverse cardiovascular events (15 [7%] of 212 vs nine [5%] of 200; pooled HR 1·80 [95% CI 0·77-4·21]; I2=0%), death from any cause (38 [18%] of 212 vs 29 [15%] of 200; 1·29 [0·78-2·11]; I2=50%), or death or dependence after 1 year (78 [53%] of 147 vs 74 [51%] of 145; pooled odds ratio 1·12 [95% CI 0·70-1·79]; I2=0%).

Interpretation: For people with atrial fibrillation and intracranial haemorrhage, oral anticoagulation had uncertain effects on the risk of any stroke or cardiovascular death (both overall and in subgroups), haemorrhagic major adverse cardiovascular events, and functional outcome. Oral anticoagulation reduced the risk of ischaemic major adverse cardiovascular events, which can inform clinical practice. These findings should encourage recruitment to, and completion of, ongoing trials.

Funding: British Heart Foundation.

自发性颅内出血后心房颤动患者口服抗凝治疗的效果:随机试验的前瞻性个体参与者数据荟萃分析。
背景:口服抗凝药物预防心房颤动和自发性颅内出血患者主要心血管不良事件的安全性和有效性尚不确定。我们计划评估在自发性颅内出血和心房颤动患者中开始和避免口服抗凝的效果。方法:在这项前瞻性荟萃分析中,我们在2023年6月23日使用Cochrane系统综述(CD012144)的策略搜索了文献数据库和试验登记处。如果临床试验是注册的、随机的,包括自发性颅内出血和心房颤动的参与者,他们被分配开始长期使用任何口服抗凝剂或避免口服抗凝剂(即安慰剂、开放对照、另一种抗凝血剂或预防重大心血管不良事件的另一种干预措施)。我们使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估了符合条件的试验。在2028年正在进行的试验完成之前,我们向已完成试验的首席研究员寻求未选择退出数据共享的个体参与者的数据。主要结果是任何中风或心血管死亡。我们使用个体参与者的数据,在每次试验提供的意向治疗数据集中,构建了随访期间结果事件首次发生的时间的Cox回归模型,然后使用固定效应逆方差模型进行荟萃分析,以产生95%CI的风险比(HR)的汇总估计。该研究在PROSPERO注册,CRD42021246133.研究结果:我们确定了四项符合条件的试验;三个仅限于患有心房颤动和颅内出血(SoSTART[NCT0313150],203名参与者)或脑出血(APACHE-AF[NCT0255693],101名参与者,NASPAF-ICH[NCT0298905],30名参与者)的参与者,其中一个包括既往有颅内出血的参与者亚组(ELDERCARE-AF[NCT02801669],有80名参与者)。在排除两名选择退出数据共享的参与者后,我们纳入了412名参与者(310[75%],年龄在75岁或以上,249[60%],CHA2DS2 VASc评分≤4,163[40%],CHA2DS2 VASc评分>4)。在212名被分配开始口服抗凝的参与者中,209人(99%)接受了直接口服抗凝剂干预,200名被分配避免口服抗凝剂的参与者中有67人(33%)接受了抗血小板单药治疗。212名开始口服抗凝治疗的参与者中有29人(14%)出现了任何中风或心血管死亡的主要结果,而200名避免口服抗凝的参与者中则有43人(22%)出现了这些结果(合并HR 0.68[95%CI 0.42-1.10];I2=0%)。口服抗凝降低了缺血性主要心血管不良事件的风险(212例中有9例[4%],200例中有38例[19%];合并HR 0.27[95%CI 0.13-0.56];I2=0%)。出血性主要心血管不良事件没有显著增加(212例中有15例[7%]对200例中有9例[5%];合并HR为1.80[95%CI为0.77-4.21];I2=0%),任何原因的死亡(212例的38例[18%对200例的29例[15%];1.78-2.11];I2=50%),或1年后死亡或依赖(147例中的78例[53%]vs 145例中的74例[51%];合并优势比为1.12[95%CI 0.70-1.79];I2=0%)。解释:对于心房颤动和颅内出血患者,口服抗凝对任何中风或心血管死亡(总体和亚组)、出血性主要心血管不良事件、,以及功能结果。口服抗凝降低了缺血性主要心血管不良事件的风险,这可以为临床实践提供信息。这些发现应鼓励招募人员参加并完成正在进行的试验。资助:英国心脏基金会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lancet Neurology
Lancet Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
58.70
自引率
1.00%
发文量
572
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Neurology is the world-leading clinical neurology journal. It publishes original research that advocates for change in, or sheds light on, neurological clinical practice. The topics covered include cerebrovascular disease, Alzheimer's disease and other dementias, epilepsy, migraine, neurological infections, movement disorders, multiple sclerosis, neuromuscular disorders, peripheral nerve disorders, pediatric neurology, sleep disorders, and traumatic brain injury. The journal publishes a range of article types, including Articles (including randomized clinical trials and meta-analyses), Review, Rapid Review, Comment, Correspondence, and Personal View. It also publishes Series and Commissions that aim to shape and drive positive change in clinical practice and health policy in areas of need in neurology. The Lancet Neurology is an internationally trusted source of clinical, public health, and global health knowledge. It has an Impact Factor of 48.0, making it the top-ranked clinical neurology journal out of 212 journals worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信