Prone position lateral interbody fusion-a narrative review.

Q1 Medicine
Journal of spine surgery Pub Date : 2023-09-22 Epub Date: 2023-09-15 DOI:10.21037/jss-23-34
Hiren M Patel, Gregory Fasani-Feldberg, Harshadkumar Patel
{"title":"Prone position lateral interbody fusion-a narrative review.","authors":"Hiren M Patel,&nbsp;Gregory Fasani-Feldberg,&nbsp;Harshadkumar Patel","doi":"10.21037/jss-23-34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Lateral access lumbar interbody fusion is an increasingly popular procedure that allows for anterior column support through discectomy, endplate preparation, and interbody insertion. This procedure was initially described and performed with the patient in the lateral decubitus position. This would typically be followed by repositioning the patient to the prone position for pedicle screw fixation. Increasingly common is the lateral access lumbar interbody fusion in the prone position. This narrative review seeks to summarize the available literature on advantages, disadvantages, and unique features of the prone position lateral access lumbar interbody fusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a narrative review of articles published up to 01 November 2022 through a PubMed search. The search terms \"prone lateral spine surgery\" and \"lateral approach spine surgery\" AND \"prone position\" were used. Articles not available in English were excluded. The search result abstracts were independently reviewed by 2 authors and 28 full text articles were reviewed. Both reviewing authors were orthopedic surgery chief residents.</p><p><strong>Key content and findings: </strong>There are several unique advantages as well as disadvantages to the prone position lateral interbody fusion. Some advantages include ease of placing pedicle screws, simultaneous posterior and lateral access, greater ease in achieving segmental lumbar lordosis, and a relatively safer positioning of the psoas muscle, lumbar plexus, and abdominal structures. Disadvantages include more difficulties with exposure and retraction, as well as visualization, positioning and ergonomics of surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prone position lateral interbody fusion is an increasingly prevalent and useful surgical technique with several advantages and disadvantages when compared to lateral interbody fusion in the lateral decubitus position. There are several surgical indications and goals for which prone lateral interbody fusion may provide significant benefit when compared to other interbody fusion techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":17131,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine surgery","volume":"9 3","pages":"331-341"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/65/d8/jss-09-03-331.PMC10570633.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of spine surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-23-34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Lateral access lumbar interbody fusion is an increasingly popular procedure that allows for anterior column support through discectomy, endplate preparation, and interbody insertion. This procedure was initially described and performed with the patient in the lateral decubitus position. This would typically be followed by repositioning the patient to the prone position for pedicle screw fixation. Increasingly common is the lateral access lumbar interbody fusion in the prone position. This narrative review seeks to summarize the available literature on advantages, disadvantages, and unique features of the prone position lateral access lumbar interbody fusion.

Methods: We performed a narrative review of articles published up to 01 November 2022 through a PubMed search. The search terms "prone lateral spine surgery" and "lateral approach spine surgery" AND "prone position" were used. Articles not available in English were excluded. The search result abstracts were independently reviewed by 2 authors and 28 full text articles were reviewed. Both reviewing authors were orthopedic surgery chief residents.

Key content and findings: There are several unique advantages as well as disadvantages to the prone position lateral interbody fusion. Some advantages include ease of placing pedicle screws, simultaneous posterior and lateral access, greater ease in achieving segmental lumbar lordosis, and a relatively safer positioning of the psoas muscle, lumbar plexus, and abdominal structures. Disadvantages include more difficulties with exposure and retraction, as well as visualization, positioning and ergonomics of surgery.

Conclusions: Prone position lateral interbody fusion is an increasingly prevalent and useful surgical technique with several advantages and disadvantages when compared to lateral interbody fusion in the lateral decubitus position. There are several surgical indications and goals for which prone lateral interbody fusion may provide significant benefit when compared to other interbody fusion techniques.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

俯卧位外侧椎体间融合——叙述性综述。
背景和目的:侧入路腰椎融合术是一种越来越流行的手术,可以通过椎间盘切除术、终板准备和椎间盘插入进行前柱支撑。该手术最初是在患者侧卧位进行描述和实施的。这通常是通过将患者重新定位到俯卧位置进行椎弓根螺钉固定。越来越常见的是俯卧位的侧向入路腰椎融合术。这篇叙述性综述旨在总结关于俯卧位外侧入路腰椎融合术的优点、缺点和独特特征的现有文献。方法:我们通过PubMed搜索对截至2022年11月1日发表的文章进行了叙述性综述。使用搜索词“俯卧侧脊柱手术”、“侧入路脊柱手术”和“俯卧位”。没有英文版的文章被排除在外。检索结果摘要由2位作者独立审查,共审查了28篇全文文章。两位综述作者都是整形外科住院主任。主要内容和发现:俯卧位外侧融合术有几个独特的优点和缺点。一些优点包括易于放置椎弓根螺钉,同时进行后侧和外侧入路,更容易实现节段性腰椎前凸,以及相对安全的腰大肌、腰丛和腹部结构定位。缺点包括暴露和缩回更困难,以及手术的可视化、定位和人体工程学。结论:俯卧位外侧融合术是一种越来越普遍和有用的手术技术,与侧卧位的外侧融合术相比,它有几个优点和缺点。与其他椎间融合技术相比,有几个手术适应症和目标可以使俯卧侧向椎间融合具有显著的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of spine surgery
Journal of spine surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信