Cyclic testing of six-strand suture techniques for zone 2 flexor tendon lacerations

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
{"title":"Cyclic testing of six-strand suture techniques for zone 2 flexor tendon lacerations","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jos.2023.09.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Biomechanical analysis using cyclic testing for repaired flexor tendons is a clinically relevant method. The aim of this study was to evaluate the tensile properties of two six-strand suture techniques, the triple looped suture and Yoshizu #1 suture techniques using cyclic testing under simulating early active mobilization conditions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Twenty-five flexor digitorum profundus tendons harvested from fresh frozen human cadaver hands were repaired in zone 2 utilizing one of three repair techniques: the 2-strand modified Kessler (MK) technique as a control, the triple looped suture (TLS) and Yoshizu #1 suture (Y1) techniques. In each suture technique, 4-0 monofilament nylon sutures were used for core sutures and 6-0 monofilament nylon sutures for circumferential running sutures. Cyclic testing was performed using 20 N with 600 cycles at 1 Hz.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Five out of eight specimens in the MK group ruptured during cyclic testing. Thus, this group was excluded from analysis. On the other hand, all tendons in the TLS and Y1 groups tolerated cyclic testing. Average gaps of the TLS and Y1 groups were 0.5 ± 0.8 mm and 1.9 ± 2.2 mm, respectively. All tendons in the TLS group and six out of nine tendons in the Y1 group formed gaps less than 2 mm. Two tendons in the Y1 group formed a gap of 3.8 and 6.6 mm had breakage of peripheral sutures at the first cycle. Mean ultimate tensile force of the TLS and Y1 group measured after cyclic tensing, were 66.2 ± 9.0 N and 65.9 ± 13.1 N, respectively. No statistical difference between the two groups was found in gap and ultimate tensile forces.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study suggested that the TLS and Y1 techniques have tensile properties to allow early active mobilization. None of tendons repaired with the TLS technique had gaps more than 2 mm.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16939,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","volume":"29 5","pages":"Pages 1214-1219"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S094926582300266X/pdfft?md5=204a74e450158886597b7b0649dde138&pid=1-s2.0-S094926582300266X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S094926582300266X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Biomechanical analysis using cyclic testing for repaired flexor tendons is a clinically relevant method. The aim of this study was to evaluate the tensile properties of two six-strand suture techniques, the triple looped suture and Yoshizu #1 suture techniques using cyclic testing under simulating early active mobilization conditions.

Methods

Twenty-five flexor digitorum profundus tendons harvested from fresh frozen human cadaver hands were repaired in zone 2 utilizing one of three repair techniques: the 2-strand modified Kessler (MK) technique as a control, the triple looped suture (TLS) and Yoshizu #1 suture (Y1) techniques. In each suture technique, 4-0 monofilament nylon sutures were used for core sutures and 6-0 monofilament nylon sutures for circumferential running sutures. Cyclic testing was performed using 20 N with 600 cycles at 1 Hz.

Results

Five out of eight specimens in the MK group ruptured during cyclic testing. Thus, this group was excluded from analysis. On the other hand, all tendons in the TLS and Y1 groups tolerated cyclic testing. Average gaps of the TLS and Y1 groups were 0.5 ± 0.8 mm and 1.9 ± 2.2 mm, respectively. All tendons in the TLS group and six out of nine tendons in the Y1 group formed gaps less than 2 mm. Two tendons in the Y1 group formed a gap of 3.8 and 6.6 mm had breakage of peripheral sutures at the first cycle. Mean ultimate tensile force of the TLS and Y1 group measured after cyclic tensing, were 66.2 ± 9.0 N and 65.9 ± 13.1 N, respectively. No statistical difference between the two groups was found in gap and ultimate tensile forces.

Conclusions

This study suggested that the TLS and Y1 techniques have tensile properties to allow early active mobilization. None of tendons repaired with the TLS technique had gaps more than 2 mm.

屈肌腱2区撕裂伤六股缝合技术的循环试验。
背景:使用循环测试对修复屈肌腱进行生物力学分析是一种临床相关方法。本研究的目的是在模拟早期主动动员条件下,使用循环测试来评估两种六股缝合技术,即三环缝合和Yoshizu#1缝合技术的拉伸性能。方法:采用两股改良Kessler(MK)技术作为对照,三股三环缝线(TLS)和Yoshizu#1缝线(Y1)技术对新鲜冷冻人尸手上采集的25根指深屈肌肌腱进行2区修复。在每种缝合技术中,4-0单丝尼龙缝合线用于核心缝合,6-0单丝尼龙缝线用于环形运行缝合。使用20N在1Hz下进行600次循环的循环试验。结果:MK组中八分之五的试样在循环试验中破裂。因此,该组被排除在分析之外。另一方面,TLS和Y1组中的所有肌腱都能耐受循环测试。TLS组和Y1组的平均间隙分别为0.5±0.8 mm和1.9±2.2 mm。TLS组中的所有肌腱和Y1组中九根肌腱中的六根肌腱形成的间隙小于2mm。Y1组中的两个肌腱形成3.8和6.6mm的间隙,在第一个循环时,外周缝合线断裂。TLS组和Y1组在循环张紧后测得的平均极限拉力分别为66.2±9.0N和65.9±13.1N。两组之间在间隙和极限拉力方面没有发现统计学差异。结论:本研究表明TLS和Y1技术具有早期主动动员的拉伸性能。用TLS技术修复的肌腱中没有一根的间隙超过2毫米。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Science
Journal of Orthopaedic Science 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Science is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. The journal publishes the latest researches and topical debates in all fields of clinical and experimental orthopaedics, including musculoskeletal medicine, sports medicine, locomotive syndrome, trauma, paediatrics, oncology and biomaterials, as well as basic researches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信