An iSOPARC Case Study of Physical Activity at a Pop-Up Park.

Christina Amo, Tyler Prochnow
{"title":"An iSOPARC Case Study of Physical Activity at a Pop-Up Park.","authors":"Christina Amo, Tyler Prochnow","doi":"10.1080/02701367.2023.2265443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Child physical activity (PA) is vital for physical and mental health, yet many children do not meet recommendations. Temporary, place-based programs designed to provide PA opportunities to youth could be a promising approach. This case-study describes familial PA at a suburban pop-up park (PUP) occurring on a weekend during the school year. <b>Methods:</b> iSOPARC (v 1.85) was used with double-rater reliability for a total of four rounds (one round every 30 minutes starting 15 minutes into the event) documenting the PA of individuals in each of the nine target areas at the PUP. PA was dichotomized into physically <i>active</i> (walking or vigorous) and sedentary (sitting or standing). Descriptive statistics were generated. <b>Results:</b> 179 individuals were observed (62% female, 26% children, 28% teens, 45% adults). Overall, 53% (<i>n</i> = 47) of children, 18% of teens (<i>n</i> = 11), and 17% (<i>n</i> = 14) of adults were observed as physically <i>active</i>. Per target area, percentages of physically <i>active</i> individuals were: 93% physically <i>active</i> (<i>n</i> = 14) at the playground, 44% physically <i>active</i> (<i>n</i> = 7) during basketball, 41% physically <i>active</i> (<i>n</i> = 9) during open play, 40% physically <i>active</i> (<i>n</i> = 4) during kickball, 24% physically <i>active</i> (<i>n</i> = 5) at check-in, 20% physically <i>active</i> (<i>n</i> = 6) in the snack area, 11% physically <i>active</i> (<i>n</i> = 2) during reading time, 10% physically <i>active</i> (<i>n</i> = 1) during lawn games, and 6% physically <i>active</i> (<i>n</i> = 2) during boxing. <b>Conclusion:</b> This observational case study provides an example of how PUPs during the school year may be a helpful tool to encourage weekend PA across communities. Future studies should consider the social environment on youth PA.</p>","PeriodicalId":94191,"journal":{"name":"Research quarterly for exercise and sport","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research quarterly for exercise and sport","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2023.2265443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Child physical activity (PA) is vital for physical and mental health, yet many children do not meet recommendations. Temporary, place-based programs designed to provide PA opportunities to youth could be a promising approach. This case-study describes familial PA at a suburban pop-up park (PUP) occurring on a weekend during the school year. Methods: iSOPARC (v 1.85) was used with double-rater reliability for a total of four rounds (one round every 30 minutes starting 15 minutes into the event) documenting the PA of individuals in each of the nine target areas at the PUP. PA was dichotomized into physically active (walking or vigorous) and sedentary (sitting or standing). Descriptive statistics were generated. Results: 179 individuals were observed (62% female, 26% children, 28% teens, 45% adults). Overall, 53% (n = 47) of children, 18% of teens (n = 11), and 17% (n = 14) of adults were observed as physically active. Per target area, percentages of physically active individuals were: 93% physically active (n = 14) at the playground, 44% physically active (n = 7) during basketball, 41% physically active (n = 9) during open play, 40% physically active (n = 4) during kickball, 24% physically active (n = 5) at check-in, 20% physically active (n = 6) in the snack area, 11% physically active (n = 2) during reading time, 10% physically active (n = 1) during lawn games, and 6% physically active (n = 2) during boxing. Conclusion: This observational case study provides an example of how PUPs during the school year may be a helpful tool to encourage weekend PA across communities. Future studies should consider the social environment on youth PA.

iSOPARC关于弹出式公园体育活动的案例研究。
目的:儿童体育活动(PA)对身心健康至关重要,但许多儿童不符合建议。旨在为年轻人提供PA机会的临时性、基于地点的项目可能是一种很有前途的方法。本案例研究描述了在学年的一个周末发生在郊区弹出式公园(PUP)的家庭性PA。方法:iSOPARC(1.85版)采用双评分可靠性,共四轮(每30轮一轮) 分钟开始15 事件开始几分钟),记录PUP的九个目标区域中的每个目标区域中个人的PA。PA被分为运动型(步行或剧烈运动)和久坐型(坐着或站着)。生成描述性统计数据。结果:观察到179人(62%为女性,26%为儿童,28%为青少年,45%为成年人)。总体而言,53%(n = 47)的儿童,18%的青少年(n = 11) 和17%(n = 14) 观察到的成年人中有一半的人身体活动。每个目标区域的体力活动个体的百分比为:93%的体力活动(n = 14) 在操场上,44%的人进行体育锻炼(n = 7) 在篮球比赛中,41%的人参加了体育活动(n = 9) 在公开赛中,40%的人参加体育活动(n = 4) 在踢球过程中,24%的人身体活动(n = 5) 办理入住手续时,20%的人进行身体活动(n = 6) 在零食区,11%的人进行体育锻炼(n = 2) 在阅读期间,10%的身体活动(n = 1) 在草坪比赛中,6%的人进行体育锻炼(n = 2) 在拳击比赛中。结论:这项观察性案例研究提供了一个例子,说明学年中的PUP如何成为鼓励社区周末PA的有用工具。未来的研究应考虑青年PA的社会环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信