Predictive value of different glycemic control markers in total hip or knee arthroplasty: A prospective study.

Riza Mert Cetik, Ibrahim Azboy, Murat Birinci, Yusuf Ozturkmen, Ahmet Sinan Kalyenci, Bulent Atilla
{"title":"Predictive value of different glycemic control markers in total hip or knee arthroplasty: A prospective study.","authors":"Riza Mert Cetik, Ibrahim Azboy, Murat Birinci, Yusuf Ozturkmen, Ahmet Sinan Kalyenci, Bulent Atilla","doi":"10.5152/j.aott.2023.23037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The optimal glycemic control marker before total hip or knee arthroplasty remains inconclusive. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) is widely used, while fructosamine may be valuable for predicting periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Fructosamine levels can be affected by serum albumin levels; albumin-corrected fructosamine (AlbF) can be calculated to overcome this issue. The objective of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of different markers for complications after primary total hip or knee arthroplasty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study included 304 patients (mean age: 65 years [range, 16-85), mean follow-up: 32 months (range, 12-49)] who underwent primary total hip or knee arthroplasty between 2018 and 2021. Of them, 156 patients had diabetes. Mean HbA1c was 6.5% (range, 4.8%-13%), fructosamine 244 µmol/L (range, 98-566 µmol/L), and AlbF 632 (range, 238-2308). Patients who did and did not have diabetes were matched 1 : 1. Hemoglobin A1c 7% and fructosamine 292 µmol/L were used as cutoff. Complications were documented. Glycemic markers were compared using logistic regression analyses, with a special focus on PJI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the logistic regression analyses, HbA1c was strongly associated with total complications [adjusted odds ratio (OR): 3.61; 95% CI, 1.65-7.91, P = .001], while fructosamine was associated with PJI (adjusted OR: 13.68; 95% CI, 1.39-134.89, P = .025). Albumin-corrected fructosamine did not show any additional benefits.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preoperative assessment before total hip or knee arthroplasty must not focus on a single marker; HbA1c is a good predictor of total complications, while fructosamine is a better predictor of PJI. To the best of our knowledge, in its first orthopedic study, AlbF did not show any advantages.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level II, Prognostic Study.</p>","PeriodicalId":93854,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10724713/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2023.23037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The optimal glycemic control marker before total hip or knee arthroplasty remains inconclusive. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) is widely used, while fructosamine may be valuable for predicting periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Fructosamine levels can be affected by serum albumin levels; albumin-corrected fructosamine (AlbF) can be calculated to overcome this issue. The objective of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of different markers for complications after primary total hip or knee arthroplasty.

Methods: This prospective cohort study included 304 patients (mean age: 65 years [range, 16-85), mean follow-up: 32 months (range, 12-49)] who underwent primary total hip or knee arthroplasty between 2018 and 2021. Of them, 156 patients had diabetes. Mean HbA1c was 6.5% (range, 4.8%-13%), fructosamine 244 µmol/L (range, 98-566 µmol/L), and AlbF 632 (range, 238-2308). Patients who did and did not have diabetes were matched 1 : 1. Hemoglobin A1c 7% and fructosamine 292 µmol/L were used as cutoff. Complications were documented. Glycemic markers were compared using logistic regression analyses, with a special focus on PJI.

Results: In the logistic regression analyses, HbA1c was strongly associated with total complications [adjusted odds ratio (OR): 3.61; 95% CI, 1.65-7.91, P = .001], while fructosamine was associated with PJI (adjusted OR: 13.68; 95% CI, 1.39-134.89, P = .025). Albumin-corrected fructosamine did not show any additional benefits.

Conclusion: Preoperative assessment before total hip or knee arthroplasty must not focus on a single marker; HbA1c is a good predictor of total complications, while fructosamine is a better predictor of PJI. To the best of our knowledge, in its first orthopedic study, AlbF did not show any advantages.

Level of evidence: Level II, Prognostic Study.

不同血糖控制标志物在全髋或膝关节置换术中的预测价值:一项前瞻性研究。
目的:全髋关节置换术或膝关节置换术前的最佳血糖控制指标尚不确定。血红蛋白A1c(HbA1c)被广泛使用,而果糖胺可能对预测假体周围关节感染(PJI)有价值。血清白蛋白水平会影响果糖胺水平;可以计算白蛋白校正的果糖胺(AlbF)来克服这个问题。本研究的目的是评估不同标志物对初次全髋关节或膝关节置换术后并发症的预测价值。方法:这项前瞻性队列研究包括304名患者(平均年龄:65岁[范围,16-85),平均随访:32个月(范围,12-49)],他们在2018年至2021年间接受了初次全髋或膝关节置换术。其中156名患者患有糖尿病。平均HbA1c为6.5%(范围4.8%-13%),果糖胺244µmol/L(范围98-566µmol/L),AlbF 632(范围238-2308)。糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者的匹配比例为1:1。血红蛋白A1c 7%和果糖胺292µmol/L用作临界值。并发症记录在案。使用逻辑回归分析比较血糖标志物,特别关注PJI。结果:在逻辑回归分析中,HbA1c与总并发症密切相关[调整比值比(OR):3.61;95%CI,1.65-7.91,P=0.001],而果糖胺与PJI相关(校正OR:13.68;95%CI,1.39-134.89,P=0.025)。白蛋白校正的果糖胺没有显示出任何额外的益处。结论:全髋关节或膝关节置换术前的术前评估不能只关注单一的标志物;HbA1c是总并发症的一个很好的预测因子,而果糖胺是PJI的一个更好的预测因子。据我们所知,在其第一项骨科研究中,AlbF没有显示出任何优势。证据级别:二级,预后研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信