Childhood Adversity among Court-Involved Youth: Heterogeneous Needs for Prevention and Treatment.

Journal of juvenile justice Pub Date : 2016-01-01
Patricia Logan-Greene, B K Elizabeth Kim, Paula S Nurius
{"title":"Childhood Adversity among Court-Involved Youth: Heterogeneous Needs for Prevention and Treatment.","authors":"Patricia Logan-Greene, B K Elizabeth Kim, Paula S Nurius","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although experiences of trauma and adversity are highly prevalent among juvenile justice-involved youth, few studies examine the heterogeneity of these histories across individuals. This study seeks to inform practitioners regarding the distinct patterns of adversity among this vulnerable population, using an expanded measure of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs). We employed Latent Class Analysis to test for meaningful subgroups of youth based on histories of childhood adversity. The sample (N=5,378) consisted of youth on probation in a western United States county. The best-fitting model contained six classes, described as: Low All (40.3%), Parental Substance Use and Incarceration (12.0%), Poverty and Parental Health Problems (13.2%), High Family Conflict and SES (15.3%), High Maltreatment and Placements (11.0%), and High All (8.1%). Additional testing revealed significant differences across classes in terms of age, gender, race/ethnicity, and living situations. Results strongly support the need to incorporate a trauma-informed framework for both juvenile justice and community service settings, as well as tailoring interventions to meet heterogeneous needs of court-involved youth. Striking variation in the forms and levels of childhood adversity argue the value of screening for ACEs in conjunction with poverty, and working to interrupt problematic trajectories in adolescence and the transition to adulthood.</p>","PeriodicalId":91548,"journal":{"name":"Journal of juvenile justice","volume":"5 2","pages":"68-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6688767/pdf/nihms-1043447.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of juvenile justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although experiences of trauma and adversity are highly prevalent among juvenile justice-involved youth, few studies examine the heterogeneity of these histories across individuals. This study seeks to inform practitioners regarding the distinct patterns of adversity among this vulnerable population, using an expanded measure of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs). We employed Latent Class Analysis to test for meaningful subgroups of youth based on histories of childhood adversity. The sample (N=5,378) consisted of youth on probation in a western United States county. The best-fitting model contained six classes, described as: Low All (40.3%), Parental Substance Use and Incarceration (12.0%), Poverty and Parental Health Problems (13.2%), High Family Conflict and SES (15.3%), High Maltreatment and Placements (11.0%), and High All (8.1%). Additional testing revealed significant differences across classes in terms of age, gender, race/ethnicity, and living situations. Results strongly support the need to incorporate a trauma-informed framework for both juvenile justice and community service settings, as well as tailoring interventions to meet heterogeneous needs of court-involved youth. Striking variation in the forms and levels of childhood adversity argue the value of screening for ACEs in conjunction with poverty, and working to interrupt problematic trajectories in adolescence and the transition to adulthood.

Abstract Image

涉事青少年的童年困境:预防和治疗的异质性需求。
尽管创伤和逆境经历在参与少年司法的青少年中非常普遍,但很少有研究考察这些历史在个体之间的异质性。这项研究试图通过扩大不良童年经历(ACE)的测量范围,让从业者了解这一弱势群体的不同逆境模式。我们采用潜在类别分析法,根据儿童时期的逆境历史,测试有意义的青年亚组。样本(N=5378)由美国西部一个县的缓刑青年组成。最佳拟合模型包含六个类别,分别为:低所有(40.3%)、父母物质使用和监禁(12.0%)、贫困和父母健康问题(13.2%)、高家庭冲突和社会经济地位(15.3%)、高度虐待和安置(11.0%)和高所有(8.1%)。额外的测试显示,各类别在年龄、性别、种族/民族方面存在显著差异,以及生活状况。结果有力地支持了为少年司法和社区服务环境纳入创伤知情框架的必要性,以及为满足法庭参与青年的不同需求而量身定制干预措施的必要性。儿童时期逆境的形式和水平存在显著差异,这证明了ACE筛查与贫困相结合的价值,并努力中断青春期和向成年过渡的问题轨迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书