Identifying Children in Foster Care and Improving Foster Care Documentation in Primary Care.

IF 1.2 Q3 PEDIATRICS
Pediatric quality & safety Pub Date : 2023-10-07 eCollection Date: 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1097/pq9.0000000000000699
Camille A Broussard, Julia M Kim, Brittany Hunter, LaToya Mobley, Maria Trent, Rebecca Seltzer
{"title":"Identifying Children in Foster Care and Improving Foster Care Documentation in Primary Care.","authors":"Camille A Broussard, Julia M Kim, Brittany Hunter, LaToya Mobley, Maria Trent, Rebecca Seltzer","doi":"10.1097/pq9.0000000000000699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Children and youth in foster care (CYFC) are a population with special healthcare needs, and the American Academy of Pediatrics has healthcare standards to care for this population, but implementation challenges include identifying clinic patients in foster care (FC). Documentation of FC status in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) can support the identification of CYFC to tailor care delivery. Therefore, we aimed to improve the percentage of CYFC with problem list (PL) documentation of FC status from 20% to 60% within 12 months.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used a five-cycle plan-do-study-act quality improvement model in two co-located primary care teaching clinics. The primary outcome was the weekly percentage of patients with FC status on EHR PL. Ishikawa cause and effect analysis and resident survey identified barriers and informed interventions: education, patient list distribution, documentation training, email reminders, and clinic champion. We constructed statistical process control charts of the primary outcome to assess for improvement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean weekly percentage of patients with FC status on PL improved from 19.8% to 60.2%. The most extensive improvements occurred after designating a clinic champion and providing email reminders with enhanced patient lists. The sustainability of PL documentation (mean = 71.7%) was demonstrated 3-4 years after the completion of plan-do-study-act cycle interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Educating providers, collaborating with child welfare to provide patient lists to providers, standardizing documentation, and designating clinic champions are promising methods of improving EHR documentation of FC status. Identifying and documenting FC status are important initial steps to optimizing care for this vulnerable population in primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":74412,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric quality & safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d8/63/pqs-8-e699.PMC10561793.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric quality & safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000699","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Children and youth in foster care (CYFC) are a population with special healthcare needs, and the American Academy of Pediatrics has healthcare standards to care for this population, but implementation challenges include identifying clinic patients in foster care (FC). Documentation of FC status in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) can support the identification of CYFC to tailor care delivery. Therefore, we aimed to improve the percentage of CYFC with problem list (PL) documentation of FC status from 20% to 60% within 12 months.

Methods: This study used a five-cycle plan-do-study-act quality improvement model in two co-located primary care teaching clinics. The primary outcome was the weekly percentage of patients with FC status on EHR PL. Ishikawa cause and effect analysis and resident survey identified barriers and informed interventions: education, patient list distribution, documentation training, email reminders, and clinic champion. We constructed statistical process control charts of the primary outcome to assess for improvement.

Results: Mean weekly percentage of patients with FC status on PL improved from 19.8% to 60.2%. The most extensive improvements occurred after designating a clinic champion and providing email reminders with enhanced patient lists. The sustainability of PL documentation (mean = 71.7%) was demonstrated 3-4 years after the completion of plan-do-study-act cycle interventions.

Conclusions: Educating providers, collaborating with child welfare to provide patient lists to providers, standardizing documentation, and designating clinic champions are promising methods of improving EHR documentation of FC status. Identifying and documenting FC status are important initial steps to optimizing care for this vulnerable population in primary care.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

识别寄养儿童并改进初级保健中的寄养文件。
背景:寄养儿童和青少年是一个有特殊医疗保健需求的群体,美国儿科学会制定了照顾这一群体的医疗保健标准,但实施方面的挑战包括识别寄养诊所的患者。电子健康记录(EHR)中FC状态的文档可以支持CYFC的识别,以定制护理提供。因此,我们的目标是在12个月内将具有FC状态问题列表(PL)文件的CYFC的百分比从20%提高到60%。方法:本研究采用五个周期的计划-学习-行为质量改进模型,在两个位于同一地点的初级保健教学诊所进行。主要结果是EHR PL上FC状态患者的每周百分比。Ishikawa因果分析和居民调查确定了障碍和知情干预措施:教育、患者名单分发、文件培训、电子邮件提醒和诊所冠军。我们构建了主要结果的统计过程控制图,以评估改进情况。结果:PL上FC状态患者的平均每周百分比从19.8%提高到60.2%。最广泛的改善发生在指定诊所冠军并提供带有增强患者列表的电子邮件提醒之后。PL文件的可持续性(平均值=71.7%)在计划-研究-行动周期干预完成3-4年后得到证明。结论:教育提供者,与儿童福利机构合作,向提供者提供患者名单,标准化文件,指定诊所冠军,是改善FC状态EHR文件的有希望的方法。识别和记录FC状况是优化初级保健中这一弱势群体护理的重要初始步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信