The impact of non-medical switching among ambulatory patients: an updated systematic literature review.

Q2 Medicine
Journal of market access & health policy Pub Date : 2019-10-19 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20016689.2019.1678563
Erin R Weeda, Elaine Nguyen, Silas Martin, Michael Ingham, Diana M Sobieraj, Brahim K Bookhart, Craig I Coleman
{"title":"The impact of non-medical switching among ambulatory patients: an updated systematic literature review.","authors":"Erin R Weeda,&nbsp;Elaine Nguyen,&nbsp;Silas Martin,&nbsp;Michael Ingham,&nbsp;Diana M Sobieraj,&nbsp;Brahim K Bookhart,&nbsp;Craig I Coleman","doi":"10.1080/20016689.2019.1678563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Non-medical switching (NMS) is defined as switching to a clinically similar but chemically distinct medication for reasons apart from lack of effectiveness, tolerability or adherence. <b>Objective</b>: To update a prior systematic review evaluating the impact of NMS on outcomes. <b>Data sources</b>: An updated search through 10/1/2018 in Medline and Web of Science was performed. <b>Study selection</b>: We included studies evaluating ≥25 patients and measuring the impact of NMS of drugs on ≥1 endpoint. <b>Data extraction</b>: The direction of association between NMS and endpoints was classified as negative, positive or neutral. <b>Data synthesis</b>: Thirty-eight studies contributed 154 endpoints. The direction of association was negative (n = 48; 31.2%) or neutral (n = 91; 59.1%) more often than it was positive (n = 15; 9.7%). Stratified by endpoint type, NMS was associated with a negative impact on clinical, economic, health-care utilization and medication-taking behavior in 26.9%,41.7%,30.3% and 75.0% of cases; with a positive effect seen in 3.0% (resource utilization) to 14.0% (clinical) of endpoints. Of the 92 endpoints from studies performed by the entity dictating the NMS, 88.0%were neutral or positive; whereas, only 40.3%of endpoints from studies conducted separately from the interested entity were neutral or positive. <b>Conclusions</b>: NMS was commonly associated with negative or neutral endpoints and was seldom associated with positive ones.</p>","PeriodicalId":73811,"journal":{"name":"Journal of market access & health policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20016689.2019.1678563","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of market access & health policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2019.1678563","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Background: Non-medical switching (NMS) is defined as switching to a clinically similar but chemically distinct medication for reasons apart from lack of effectiveness, tolerability or adherence. Objective: To update a prior systematic review evaluating the impact of NMS on outcomes. Data sources: An updated search through 10/1/2018 in Medline and Web of Science was performed. Study selection: We included studies evaluating ≥25 patients and measuring the impact of NMS of drugs on ≥1 endpoint. Data extraction: The direction of association between NMS and endpoints was classified as negative, positive or neutral. Data synthesis: Thirty-eight studies contributed 154 endpoints. The direction of association was negative (n = 48; 31.2%) or neutral (n = 91; 59.1%) more often than it was positive (n = 15; 9.7%). Stratified by endpoint type, NMS was associated with a negative impact on clinical, economic, health-care utilization and medication-taking behavior in 26.9%,41.7%,30.3% and 75.0% of cases; with a positive effect seen in 3.0% (resource utilization) to 14.0% (clinical) of endpoints. Of the 92 endpoints from studies performed by the entity dictating the NMS, 88.0%were neutral or positive; whereas, only 40.3%of endpoints from studies conducted separately from the interested entity were neutral or positive. Conclusions: NMS was commonly associated with negative or neutral endpoints and was seldom associated with positive ones.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

门诊患者非医疗转换的影响:一项最新的系统文献综述。
背景:非药物转换(NMS)是指由于缺乏有效性、耐受性或依从性之外的原因而转换为临床上相似但化学上不同的药物。目的:更新先前评估NMS对结果影响的系统综述。数据来源:Medline和Web of Science于2018年1月10日进行了最新搜索。研究选择:我们纳入了评估≥25名患者并测量药物NMS对≥1个终点的影响的研究。数据提取:NMS和端点之间的关联方向分为阴性、阳性或中性。数据综合:38项研究贡献了154个终点。关联方向为阴性(n=48;31.2%)或中性(n=91;59.1%)的频率高于阳性(n=15;9.7%)。按终点类型划分,NMS对临床、经济、医疗利用和服药行为的负面影响分别为26.9%、41.7%、30.3%和75.0%;在3.0%(资源利用率)至14.0%(临床)的终点中观察到积极效果。在决定NMS的实体进行的92个研究终点中,88.0%为中性或阳性;然而,与感兴趣的实体分开进行的研究中,只有40.3%的终点是中性或阳性的。结论:NMS通常与阴性或中性终点相关,很少与阳性终点相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信