Psychometric Testing of the Turkish Version of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool.

IF 0.9 Q4 NURSING
Cemre Paylan Akkoç, Fatma Orgun
{"title":"Psychometric Testing of the Turkish Version of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool.","authors":"Cemre Paylan Akkoç, Fatma Orgun","doi":"10.5152/FNJN.2023.22196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to test the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool METHODS: The study was carried out with intern nurses receiving education at a Nursing Faculty in Turkey between July 2019 and June 2020. 248 intern nurses participated in PEMAT-P and 223 in PEMAT-A/V in this study. Five audio-visual and five printed materials were used. The Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool and the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool User's Guide were translated into Turkish and culturally adapted using standard guidelines. Content and construct validity analyses were performed for the validity of the Turkish version of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool, and internal consistency, invariability, and external consistency analyses were performed for its reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The content validity index was 1.00 for all the scale items. At the conclusion of the factor analyses, the scale has composed a twodimension construct of understandability and actionability. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients were observed to be 0.901 of the Turkish version of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printable Materials and 0.897 of the Turkish version of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Materials. The Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient (rxy) was high (Turkish version of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printable Materials rxy=0.815, Turkish version of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Materials rxy=0.804). Cohen's kappa coefficients were obtained as 0.736 of the Turkish version of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printable Materials and 0.781 of the Turkish version of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Materials.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Turkish version of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool is a valid and reliable measurement tool in the evaluation of both printed and audiovisual patient education materials.</p>","PeriodicalId":73033,"journal":{"name":"Florence Nightingale journal of nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10724776/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Florence Nightingale journal of nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/FNJN.2023.22196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to test the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool METHODS: The study was carried out with intern nurses receiving education at a Nursing Faculty in Turkey between July 2019 and June 2020. 248 intern nurses participated in PEMAT-P and 223 in PEMAT-A/V in this study. Five audio-visual and five printed materials were used. The Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool and the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool User's Guide were translated into Turkish and culturally adapted using standard guidelines. Content and construct validity analyses were performed for the validity of the Turkish version of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool, and internal consistency, invariability, and external consistency analyses were performed for its reliability.

Results: The content validity index was 1.00 for all the scale items. At the conclusion of the factor analyses, the scale has composed a twodimension construct of understandability and actionability. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients were observed to be 0.901 of the Turkish version of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printable Materials and 0.897 of the Turkish version of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Materials. The Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient (rxy) was high (Turkish version of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printable Materials rxy=0.815, Turkish version of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Materials rxy=0.804). Cohen's kappa coefficients were obtained as 0.736 of the Turkish version of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printable Materials and 0.781 of the Turkish version of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Materials.

Conclusion: The Turkish version of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool is a valid and reliable measurement tool in the evaluation of both printed and audiovisual patient education materials.

土耳其版患者教育材料评估工具的心理测量测试。
目的:本研究的目的是测试土耳其版患者教育材料评估工具的心理测量特性。方法:该研究于2019年7月至2020年6月在土耳其一所护理学院接受教育的实习护士中进行。248名实习护士参加了PEMAT-P,223名实习护士参与了PEMAT-A/V。使用了五种视听材料和五种印刷材料。《患者教育资料评估工具》和《患者教育材料评估工具用户指南》被翻译成土耳其语,并使用标准指南进行文化调整。对土耳其版患者教育材料评估工具的有效性进行了内容和结构有效性分析,并对其可靠性进行了内部一致性、不变性和外部一致性分析。结果:所有量表项目的内容有效性指数均为1.00。因子分析的结论是,量表由可理解性和可操作性两个维度构成。据观察,Cronbachα系数为土耳其版可打印材料患者教育材料评估工具的0.901,为土耳其版视听材料患者教育资料评估工具的0.897。Pearson乘积矩相关系数(rxy)较高(土耳其版可打印材料患者教育材料评估工具rxy=0.815,土耳其版视听材料患者教育资料评估工具rxx=0.804)。Cohen的kappa系数为土耳其版患者教育资料评估工具的0.736可打印材料和0.781土耳其版患者教育材料视听材料评估工具。结论:土耳其版患者教学材料评估工具是评估打印和视听患者教育材料的有效和可靠的测量工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信