Physiological and Subjective Measures of Anxiety with Repeated Exposure to Virtual Construction Sites at Different Heights

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sachini N.K. Kodithuwakku Arachchige , Harish Chander , Alana J. Turner , Alireza Shojaei , Adam C. Knight , Aaron Griffith , Reuben F. Burch , Chih-Chia Chen
{"title":"Physiological and Subjective Measures of Anxiety with Repeated Exposure to Virtual Construction Sites at Different Heights","authors":"Sachini N.K. Kodithuwakku Arachchige ,&nbsp;Harish Chander ,&nbsp;Alana J. Turner ,&nbsp;Alireza Shojaei ,&nbsp;Adam C. Knight ,&nbsp;Aaron Griffith ,&nbsp;Reuben F. Burch ,&nbsp;Chih-Chia Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.shaw.2023.07.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Occupational workers at altitudes are more prone to falls, leading to catastrophic outcomes. Acrophobia, height-related anxiety, and affected executive functions lead to postural instabilities, causing falls. This study investigated the effects of repeated virtual height exposure and training on cognitive processing and height-related anxiety.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Twenty-eight healthy volunteers (age 20.48 ± 1.26 years; mass 69.52 ± 13.78 kg) were recruited and tested in seven virtual environments (VE) [ground (G), 2-story altitude (A1), 2-story edge (E1), 4-story altitude (A2), 4-story edge (E2), 6-story altitude (A3), and 6-story edge (E3)] over three days. At each VE, participants identified occupational hazards present in the VE and completed an Attitude Towards Heights Questionnaire (ATHQ) and a modified State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Questionnaire (mSTAIQ). The number of hazards identified and the ATHQ and mSTAIQ scores were analyzed using a 7 (VE; G, A1, A2, A3, E1, E2, E3) x 3 (DAY; DAY 1, DAY 2, DAY 3) factorial repeated measures analysis of variance.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The participants identified the lowest number of hazards at A3 and E3 VEs and on DAY 1 compared to other VEs and DAYs. ATHQ scores were lowest at G, A1, and E1 VEs.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Cognitive processing is negatively affected by virtual altitudes, while it improves with short-term training. The features of virtual reality, such as higher involvement, engagement, and reliability, make it a better training tool to be considered in ergonomic settings. The findings of this study will provide insights into cognitive dual-tasking at altitude and its challenges, which will aid in minimizing occupational falls.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56149,"journal":{"name":"Safety and Health at Work","volume":"14 3","pages":"Pages 303-308"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2d/fa/main.PMC10562126.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safety and Health at Work","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2093791123000410","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Occupational workers at altitudes are more prone to falls, leading to catastrophic outcomes. Acrophobia, height-related anxiety, and affected executive functions lead to postural instabilities, causing falls. This study investigated the effects of repeated virtual height exposure and training on cognitive processing and height-related anxiety.

Methods

Twenty-eight healthy volunteers (age 20.48 ± 1.26 years; mass 69.52 ± 13.78 kg) were recruited and tested in seven virtual environments (VE) [ground (G), 2-story altitude (A1), 2-story edge (E1), 4-story altitude (A2), 4-story edge (E2), 6-story altitude (A3), and 6-story edge (E3)] over three days. At each VE, participants identified occupational hazards present in the VE and completed an Attitude Towards Heights Questionnaire (ATHQ) and a modified State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Questionnaire (mSTAIQ). The number of hazards identified and the ATHQ and mSTAIQ scores were analyzed using a 7 (VE; G, A1, A2, A3, E1, E2, E3) x 3 (DAY; DAY 1, DAY 2, DAY 3) factorial repeated measures analysis of variance.

Results

The participants identified the lowest number of hazards at A3 and E3 VEs and on DAY 1 compared to other VEs and DAYs. ATHQ scores were lowest at G, A1, and E1 VEs.

Conclusion

Cognitive processing is negatively affected by virtual altitudes, while it improves with short-term training. The features of virtual reality, such as higher involvement, engagement, and reliability, make it a better training tool to be considered in ergonomic settings. The findings of this study will provide insights into cognitive dual-tasking at altitude and its challenges, which will aid in minimizing occupational falls.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

反复暴露于不同高度的虚拟建筑工地的焦虑的生理和主观测量。
背景:高海拔地区的职业工人更容易摔倒,导致灾难性后果。恐高症、与身高相关的焦虑和执行功能受到影响会导致姿势不稳定,导致跌倒。本研究调查了重复虚拟身高暴露和训练对认知加工和身高相关焦虑的影响。方法:招募28名健康志愿者(年龄20.48±1.26岁;体重69.52±13.78kg),在7个虚拟环境(VE)中进行为期3天的测试[地面(G)、2层海拔(A1)、2楼边缘(E1)、4层海拔(A2)、4楼边缘(E2)、6层海拔(A3)和6层边缘(E3)]。在每次VE中,参与者都会识别VE中存在的职业危害,并完成对高地的态度问卷(ATHQ)和改良的状态特质焦虑量表(mSTAIQ)。使用7(VE;G、A1、A2、A3、E1、E2、E3)x 3(DAY;第1天、第2天、第3天)析因重复测量方差分析来分析识别的危险数量以及ATHQ和mSTAIQ评分。结果:与其他VEs和DAY相比,参与者在A3和E3 VEs以及第1天发现的危害数量最低。ATHQ在G、A1和E1 VEs中得分最低。结论:虚拟海拔对认知加工产生负面影响,而短期训练可改善认知加工。虚拟现实的特点,如更高的参与度、参与度和可靠性,使其成为人体工程学环境中考虑的更好的训练工具。这项研究的发现将为高空认知双重任务及其挑战提供见解,这将有助于最大限度地减少职业跌倒。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Safety and Health at Work
Safety and Health at Work Social Sciences-Safety Research
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1080
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Safety and Health at Work (SH@W) is an international, peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary journal published quarterly in English beginning in 2010. The journal is aimed at providing grounds for the exchange of ideas and data developed through research experience in the broad field of occupational health and safety. Articles may deal with scientific research to improve workers'' health and safety by eliminating occupational accidents and diseases, pursuing a better working life, and creating a safe and comfortable working environment. The journal focuses primarily on original articles across the whole scope of occupational health and safety, but also welcomes up-to-date review papers and short communications and commentaries on urgent issues and case studies on unique epidemiological survey, methods of accident investigation, and analysis. High priority will be given to articles on occupational epidemiology, medicine, hygiene, toxicology, nursing and health services, work safety, ergonomics, work organization, engineering of safety (mechanical, electrical, chemical, and construction), safety management and policy, and studies related to economic evaluation and its social policy and organizational aspects. Its abbreviated title is Saf Health Work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信