Is imaging accurate enough to detect index lesion in prostate cancer? Analysis of the performance of MRI and other imaging modalities.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Minerva Urology and Nephrology Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-10 DOI:10.23736/S2724-6051.23.05285-0
Vito Lorusso, Michele Talso, Franco Palmisano, Nicolas Branger, Antonio M Granata, Cristian Fiori, Andrea Gregori, Geraldine Pignot, Jochen Walz
{"title":"Is imaging accurate enough to detect index lesion in prostate cancer? Analysis of the performance of MRI and other imaging modalities.","authors":"Vito Lorusso, Michele Talso, Franco Palmisano, Nicolas Branger, Antonio M Granata, Cristian Fiori, Andrea Gregori, Geraldine Pignot, Jochen Walz","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.23.05285-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prostate imaging techniques have progressed across the years allowing for a better detection and characterization of prostate cancer (PCa) lesions. These advancements have led to the possibility to also improve and tailor the treatments on the most aggressive lesion, defined as Index Lesion (IL), to reduce morbidity. The IL is, indeed, considered as the entity which encompass the most aggressive features in prostate cancer disease. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has emerged as the suggested tool to detect the disease and plan treatments, including those under investigation such as focal therapy (FT). Our review aimed to query the literature on the ability of mpMRI in IL detection and to explore the future perspectives in PCa IL diagnosis. A review of the literature was performed from January 2010 to July 2023. All studies investigating the performance of mpMRI and other main imaging techniques able to detect the IL were assessed and evaluated. mpMRI performs well in the detection of IL with a sensitivity which reaches 71% to 94% among the different studies. However, mpMRI seems to have limited sensitivity in the detection of small tumours (<0.5 mL) and low-grade histology lesions. To overcome these limitations other diagnostic imaging techniques have been proposed. Multiparametric Ultrasound has shown results comparable to mpMRI while detecting 4.3% fewer clinically significant PCa (P=0.042). Positron emission tomography-based modalities using PSMA seems to have higher sensitivity than mpMRI, being able to yield from 13.5% to 18.2% additional cancers. MRI has emerged as the recommended tool since most of the IL can be easily identified, and is the imaging of choice while selecting patients for FT. Other imaging modalities has been proposed to improve PCa lesions detection, but results need to be confirmed by ongoing randomized controlled trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"22-30"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.23.05285-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prostate imaging techniques have progressed across the years allowing for a better detection and characterization of prostate cancer (PCa) lesions. These advancements have led to the possibility to also improve and tailor the treatments on the most aggressive lesion, defined as Index Lesion (IL), to reduce morbidity. The IL is, indeed, considered as the entity which encompass the most aggressive features in prostate cancer disease. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has emerged as the suggested tool to detect the disease and plan treatments, including those under investigation such as focal therapy (FT). Our review aimed to query the literature on the ability of mpMRI in IL detection and to explore the future perspectives in PCa IL diagnosis. A review of the literature was performed from January 2010 to July 2023. All studies investigating the performance of mpMRI and other main imaging techniques able to detect the IL were assessed and evaluated. mpMRI performs well in the detection of IL with a sensitivity which reaches 71% to 94% among the different studies. However, mpMRI seems to have limited sensitivity in the detection of small tumours (<0.5 mL) and low-grade histology lesions. To overcome these limitations other diagnostic imaging techniques have been proposed. Multiparametric Ultrasound has shown results comparable to mpMRI while detecting 4.3% fewer clinically significant PCa (P=0.042). Positron emission tomography-based modalities using PSMA seems to have higher sensitivity than mpMRI, being able to yield from 13.5% to 18.2% additional cancers. MRI has emerged as the recommended tool since most of the IL can be easily identified, and is the imaging of choice while selecting patients for FT. Other imaging modalities has been proposed to improve PCa lesions detection, but results need to be confirmed by ongoing randomized controlled trial.

成像是否足够准确以检测癌症前列腺的指数病变?MRI和其他成像模式的性能分析。
前列腺成像技术多年来取得了进展,从而能够更好地检测和表征前列腺癌症(PCa)病变。这些进步也带来了改进和调整最具侵袭性病变(定义为指数病变(IL))治疗的可能性,以降低发病率。实际上,IL被认为是包含癌症前列腺疾病最具侵袭性特征的实体。多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)已成为检测疾病和计划治疗的建议工具,包括正在研究的病灶治疗(FT)。我们的综述旨在查询关于mpMRI在IL检测中的能力的文献,并探索PCa IL诊断的未来前景。2010年1月至2023年7月对文献进行了综述。对所有研究mpMRI和其他能够检测IL的主要成像技术的性能的研究进行了评估。mpMRI在检测IL方面表现良好,在不同的研究中灵敏度达到71%至94%。然而,mpMRI在检测小肿瘤方面的灵敏度似乎有限(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva Urology and Nephrology
Minerva Urology and Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
32.70%
发文量
237
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信