Variation in telehealth use for endocrine care: Patterns and predictors under the "new normal".

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-12 DOI:10.1177/1357633X231203144
Varsha G Vimalananda, Kevin Arao, Shirley Qian, Alison Leibowitz, Margaret F Zupa, Justin Benzer, B Graeme Fincke, Mark Zocchi, Mark Meterko, Dan Berlowitz, Kailyn E Sitter, Jolie B Wormwood
{"title":"Variation in telehealth use for endocrine care: Patterns and predictors under the \"new normal\".","authors":"Varsha G Vimalananda, Kevin Arao, Shirley Qian, Alison Leibowitz, Margaret F Zupa, Justin Benzer, B Graeme Fincke, Mark Zocchi, Mark Meterko, Dan Berlowitz, Kailyn E Sitter, Jolie B Wormwood","doi":"10.1177/1357633X231203144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionUse of telehealth for outpatient endocrine care remains common since onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, though the context for its use has matured. We aimed to describe the variation in telehealth use for outpatient endocrine visits under these \"new normal\" conditions and examine the patient, clinician-, and organization-level factors predicting use.MethodsRetrospective cross-sectional study using data from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Corporate Data Warehouse on 167,017 endocrine visits conducted between 3/9/21 and 3/8/22. We used mixed effects logistic regression models to examine 1) use of telehealth vs. in-person care among all visits and 2) use of telephone vs. video among the subsample of telehealth visits.ResultsVisits were in person (58%), by telephone (29%), or by video (13%). Unique variability in telehealth use at each level of the analysis was 56% patient visit, 24% clinician, 18% facility. The strongest predictors were visit type (first vs. follow up) and clinician and facility characteristics. Among telehealth visits, unique variability in telephone (vs. video) use at each level was 44% patient visit, 24% clinician, 26% facility. The strongest predictors of telephone vs. video were visit type, patient age, and percent of the facility's population that was rural.ConclusionsWe found wide variation in use of telehealth for endocrinology under the \"new normal\". Future research should examine clinician and facility factors driving variation, as many may be amenable to influence by clinical leaders and leveraged to enhance the availability of telehealth for all clinically appropriate patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","volume":" ","pages":"592-600"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X231203144","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionUse of telehealth for outpatient endocrine care remains common since onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, though the context for its use has matured. We aimed to describe the variation in telehealth use for outpatient endocrine visits under these "new normal" conditions and examine the patient, clinician-, and organization-level factors predicting use.MethodsRetrospective cross-sectional study using data from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Corporate Data Warehouse on 167,017 endocrine visits conducted between 3/9/21 and 3/8/22. We used mixed effects logistic regression models to examine 1) use of telehealth vs. in-person care among all visits and 2) use of telephone vs. video among the subsample of telehealth visits.ResultsVisits were in person (58%), by telephone (29%), or by video (13%). Unique variability in telehealth use at each level of the analysis was 56% patient visit, 24% clinician, 18% facility. The strongest predictors were visit type (first vs. follow up) and clinician and facility characteristics. Among telehealth visits, unique variability in telephone (vs. video) use at each level was 44% patient visit, 24% clinician, 26% facility. The strongest predictors of telephone vs. video were visit type, patient age, and percent of the facility's population that was rural.ConclusionsWe found wide variation in use of telehealth for endocrinology under the "new normal". Future research should examine clinician and facility factors driving variation, as many may be amenable to influence by clinical leaders and leveraged to enhance the availability of telehealth for all clinically appropriate patients.

内分泌护理远程医疗使用的变化:“新常态”下的模式和预测因素。
简介:自新冠肺炎大流行开始以来,远程医疗用于门诊内分泌护理仍然很常见,尽管其使用背景已经成熟。我们的目的是描述在这些“新常态”条件下门诊内分泌就诊远程医疗使用的变化,并检查患者、临床医生和组织层面预测使用的因素。方法:使用美国退伍军人事务部(VA)企业数据仓库的数据,对21年3月9日至22年3月8日期间进行的167017次内分泌访视进行回顾性横断面研究。我们使用混合效应逻辑回归模型来检验1)在所有就诊中使用远程医疗与亲自护理的情况,以及2)在远程医疗就诊的子样本中使用电话与视频的情况。结果:就诊者为亲自(58%)、电话(29%)或视频(13%)。远程医疗使用在每个分析级别的独特可变性是56%的患者就诊,24%的临床医生,18%的设施。最有力的预测因素是就诊类型(首次与随访)、临床医生和设施特征。在远程医疗就诊中,每个级别的电话(与视频)使用的独特可变性为44%的患者就诊、24%的临床医生就诊和26%的设施就诊。电话与视频最有力的预测因素是就诊类型、患者年龄和该机构农村人口的百分比。结论:我们发现在“新常态”下,内分泌科远程医疗的使用存在很大差异。未来的研究应该检查驱动变异的临床医生和设施因素,因为许多因素可能会受到临床领导者的影响,并被用来提高所有临床合适患者的远程医疗可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare provides excellent peer reviewed coverage of developments in telemedicine and e-health and is now widely recognised as the leading journal in its field. Contributions from around the world provide a unique perspective on how different countries and health systems are using new technology in health care. Sections within the journal include technology updates, editorials, original articles, research tutorials, educational material, review articles and reports from various telemedicine organisations. A subscription to this journal will help you to stay up-to-date in this fast moving and growing area of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信