Warming Prior to Heel Stick: Blood Sample Quality and Infant Comfort-A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Advances in Neonatal Care Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-12 DOI:10.1097/ANC.0000000000001110
Ulla List Toennesen, Helene Kierkegaard, Poul-Erik Kofoed, Jonna Skov Madsen, Jesper Fenger-Gron, Betty Noergaard, Patricia Diana Soerensen
{"title":"Warming Prior to Heel Stick: Blood Sample Quality and Infant Comfort-A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Ulla List Toennesen, Helene Kierkegaard, Poul-Erik Kofoed, Jonna Skov Madsen, Jesper Fenger-Gron, Betty Noergaard, Patricia Diana Soerensen","doi":"10.1097/ANC.0000000000001110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Capillary blood sampling (heel stick) in infants is commonly performed in neonatal care units. Before the procedure, warming the infant's heel is often a customary practice, but no consensus exists on the most effective heel-warming method.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the effects of routinely used warming methods (glove, gel pack, or blanket) applied prior to heel stick on blood sample quality and infant's comfort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial conducted in the neonatal intensive care unit included infants (postmenstrual age of ≥28 + 0 weeks and ≤43 + 6 weeks) who were computer-randomized to 1 of 3 warming methods.The primary outcome was blood flow velocity at sampling. Secondary outcomes were hemolysis index, infant COMFORTneo score, and frequency of postprocedure skin injuries. In addition, irrespective of the warming method used, the correlation between heel skin temperature and postprocedure heel skin injury was analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 176 heel warmings were successfully randomized, and 173 were analyzed. Despite a significant difference in obtained heel skin temperature after warming between the 3 warming methods ( P = .001), no difference in blood flow velocity ( P = .91), hemolysis index ( P = .99), or COMFORTneo score ( P = .76) was found. Baseline skin temperatures above 37.0°C were associated with higher incidences of skin injury, and skin temperatures after warming were significantly higher in skin-injured heels ( P = .038).</p><p><strong>Implications for practice and research: </strong>All 3 warming methods had similar effects on blood sample quality and infant's comfort. However, excessive warming of the heel should be avoided to prevent skin injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":48862,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Neonatal Care","volume":" ","pages":"E129-E138"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10686271/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Neonatal Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANC.0000000000001110","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Capillary blood sampling (heel stick) in infants is commonly performed in neonatal care units. Before the procedure, warming the infant's heel is often a customary practice, but no consensus exists on the most effective heel-warming method.

Purpose: To compare the effects of routinely used warming methods (glove, gel pack, or blanket) applied prior to heel stick on blood sample quality and infant's comfort.

Methods: This prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial conducted in the neonatal intensive care unit included infants (postmenstrual age of ≥28 + 0 weeks and ≤43 + 6 weeks) who were computer-randomized to 1 of 3 warming methods.The primary outcome was blood flow velocity at sampling. Secondary outcomes were hemolysis index, infant COMFORTneo score, and frequency of postprocedure skin injuries. In addition, irrespective of the warming method used, the correlation between heel skin temperature and postprocedure heel skin injury was analyzed.

Results: A total of 176 heel warmings were successfully randomized, and 173 were analyzed. Despite a significant difference in obtained heel skin temperature after warming between the 3 warming methods ( P = .001), no difference in blood flow velocity ( P = .91), hemolysis index ( P = .99), or COMFORTneo score ( P = .76) was found. Baseline skin temperatures above 37.0°C were associated with higher incidences of skin injury, and skin temperatures after warming were significantly higher in skin-injured heels ( P = .038).

Implications for practice and research: All 3 warming methods had similar effects on blood sample quality and infant's comfort. However, excessive warming of the heel should be avoided to prevent skin injuries.

脚跟贴前保暖:血液样本质量和婴儿舒适度——一项随机对照试验。
背景:新生儿毛细管血液取样(足跟棒)通常在新生儿护理室进行。在手术之前,给婴儿的脚后跟加温通常是一种习惯做法,但对于最有效的脚后跟加温方法还没有达成共识。目的:比较足跟贴前常规使用的加温方法(手套、凝胶包或毯子)对血液样本质量和婴儿舒适度的影响。方法:这项在新生儿重症监护室进行的前瞻性、双盲、随机对照试验包括婴儿(月经后年龄≥28+0周且≤43+6周),他们被计算机随机分为三种加温方法中的一种。主要结果是采样时的血流速度。次要结果是溶血指数、婴儿COMFORTneo评分和术后皮肤损伤的频率。此外,无论使用何种加温方法,都分析了足跟皮肤温度与术后足跟皮肤损伤之间的相关性。结果:共有176例足跟加温成功随机分组,173例进行了分析。尽管三种加温方法在加温后获得的足跟皮肤温度有显著差异(P=.001),但在血流速度(P=.91)、溶血指数(P=.99)或COMFORTneo评分(P=.76)方面没有发现差异。37.0°C以上的基线皮肤温度与更高的皮肤损伤发生率相关,并且皮肤损伤的脚跟在加温后的皮肤温度显著更高(P=.038)。对实践和研究的启示:所有三种加温方法对血样质量和婴儿舒适度的影响相似。但是,应该避免过度加热脚跟,以防止皮肤受伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: Advances in Neonatal Care takes a unique and dynamic approach to the original research and clinical practice articles it publishes. Addressing the practice challenges faced every day—caring for the 40,000-plus low-birth-weight infants in Level II and Level III NICUs each year—the journal promotes evidence-based care and improved outcomes for the tiniest patients and their families. Peer-reviewed editorial includes unique and detailed visual and teaching aids, such as Family Teaching Toolbox, Research to Practice, Cultivating Clinical Expertise, and Online Features. Each issue offers Continuing Education (CE) articles in both print and online formats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信