Harvest for health in survivors of chronic disease: A demonstration project in the Alabama Black Belt and Mississippi Delta Region.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Jennifer R Bail, Jeff Wilson, Meghan Tipre, Angela Duck, Katherine Hall, Oluseun Akinyele, Tara Bowman, Claudia Hardy, Marcus Garner, Wendy Demark-Wahnefried, Monica Baskin
{"title":"Harvest for health in survivors of chronic disease: A demonstration project in the Alabama Black Belt and Mississippi Delta Region.","authors":"Jennifer R Bail, Jeff Wilson, Meghan Tipre, Angela Duck, Katherine Hall, Oluseun Akinyele, Tara Bowman, Claudia Hardy, Marcus Garner, Wendy Demark-Wahnefried, Monica Baskin","doi":"10.1093/tbm/ibad062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This demonstration project expands upon the Harvest for Health vegetable gardening intervention for cancer survivors by: (i) including survivors of other chronic diseases (i.e. heart disease and diabetes); and (ii) targeting an area with known health inequities (Alabama Black Belt and Mississippi Delta Region). To assess: (i) gardening acceptability (engagement, satisfaction, sustainability, and safety); and (ii) changes over time in health behaviors (fruit and vegetable [F&V] intake, and physical activity) and outcomes (physical performance and anthropometrics). Chronic disease survivors (CDS) were recruited across 15 counties in Alabama and Mississippi and provided with gardening supplies and paired with a master gardener (MG). MGs mentored participants in planning, planting, and maintaining a vegetable garden over a 3-month period. Data collection consisted of an electronic survey (baseline, post-intervention, 6-month follow-up) and community-based physical assessments (baseline and post-intervention). Participants (n = 137; 92% African American; Mage = 65) included individuals with a history of diabetes (56%), heart disease (29%), and cancer (26%). Seventy-five percent of participants engaged in gardening ≥3 times a week. Significant improvements in F&V intake (+0.73, P = .04), physical activity (+49.6, P < .01), and 4 of 7 physical performance measures were observed, while positive trends were seen in others. Eighteen participants withdrew (13% attrition rate). No adverse events occurred. Participants were satisfied with their gardening experience (90%) and were still gardening at 6-month follow-up (85%). Seventy-two percent of participants expanded, or planned on expanding, their garden at 6-month follow-up. Harvest for Health was acceptable and associated with improved health behaviors and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48679,"journal":{"name":"Translational Behavioral Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"127-137"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10849179/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibad062","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This demonstration project expands upon the Harvest for Health vegetable gardening intervention for cancer survivors by: (i) including survivors of other chronic diseases (i.e. heart disease and diabetes); and (ii) targeting an area with known health inequities (Alabama Black Belt and Mississippi Delta Region). To assess: (i) gardening acceptability (engagement, satisfaction, sustainability, and safety); and (ii) changes over time in health behaviors (fruit and vegetable [F&V] intake, and physical activity) and outcomes (physical performance and anthropometrics). Chronic disease survivors (CDS) were recruited across 15 counties in Alabama and Mississippi and provided with gardening supplies and paired with a master gardener (MG). MGs mentored participants in planning, planting, and maintaining a vegetable garden over a 3-month period. Data collection consisted of an electronic survey (baseline, post-intervention, 6-month follow-up) and community-based physical assessments (baseline and post-intervention). Participants (n = 137; 92% African American; Mage = 65) included individuals with a history of diabetes (56%), heart disease (29%), and cancer (26%). Seventy-five percent of participants engaged in gardening ≥3 times a week. Significant improvements in F&V intake (+0.73, P = .04), physical activity (+49.6, P < .01), and 4 of 7 physical performance measures were observed, while positive trends were seen in others. Eighteen participants withdrew (13% attrition rate). No adverse events occurred. Participants were satisfied with their gardening experience (90%) and were still gardening at 6-month follow-up (85%). Seventy-two percent of participants expanded, or planned on expanding, their garden at 6-month follow-up. Harvest for Health was acceptable and associated with improved health behaviors and outcomes.

慢性病幸存者的健康收获:阿拉巴马州黑带和密西西比三角洲地区的一个示范项目。
该示范项目扩大了为癌症幸存者提供的“健康收获”蔬菜园艺干预:(i)包括其他慢性病(即心脏病和糖尿病)的幸存者;以及(ii)针对已知健康不平等的地区(阿拉巴马黑带和密西西比三角洲地区)。评估:(i)园艺可接受性(参与度、满意度、可持续性和安全性);以及(ii)健康行为(水果和蔬菜[F&V]摄入以及体育活动)和结果(身体表现和人体测量)随时间的变化。在阿拉巴马州和密西西比州的15个县招募了慢性病幸存者(CDS),为他们提供园艺用品,并与一名园艺大师(MG)配对。MGs指导参与者在3个月内规划、种植和维护菜园。数据收集包括电子调查(基线、干预后、6个月随访)和基于社区的身体评估(基线和干预后)。参与者(n=137;92%为非裔美国人;Mage=65)包括有糖尿病(56%)、心脏病(29%)和癌症(26%)病史的个人。75%的参与者每周从事园艺活动≥3次。观察到F&V摄入量(+0.73,P=0.04)、体力活动(+49.6,P<0.01)和7项体力指标中的4项有显著改善,而其他指标则呈积极趋势。18名参与者退出(流失率为13%)。未发生不良事件。参与者对自己的园艺经验感到满意(90%),在6个月的随访中仍在园艺(85%)。72%的参与者在6个月的随访中扩大或计划扩大他们的花园。健康收获是可以接受的,并与改善健康行为和结果有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Translational Behavioral Medicine
Translational Behavioral Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Translational Behavioral Medicine publishes content that engages, informs, and catalyzes dialogue about behavioral medicine among the research, practice, and policy communities. TBM began receiving an Impact Factor in 2015 and currently holds an Impact Factor of 2.989. TBM is one of two journals published by the Society of Behavioral Medicine. The Society of Behavioral Medicine is a multidisciplinary organization of clinicians, educators, and scientists dedicated to promoting the study of the interactions of behavior with biology and the environment, and then applying that knowledge to improve the health and well-being of individuals, families, communities, and populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信