The value of shock index, modified shock index and age shock index to predict mortality and hospitalisation in a district level emergency centre

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Patrick Aleka, Candice Van Koningsbruggen, Clint Hendrikse
{"title":"The value of shock index, modified shock index and age shock index to predict mortality and hospitalisation in a district level emergency centre","authors":"Patrick Aleka,&nbsp;Candice Van Koningsbruggen,&nbsp;Clint Hendrikse","doi":"10.1016/j.afjem.2023.09.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Triage is the most important step in patients’ journey through an Emergency Centre (EC) and directly impacts time to critical actions. Triage tools, like the South African Triage Scale, are however not designed to predict patient outcomes. The shock index (SI), modified shock index (MSI) and age shock index (ASI) are clinical markers derived from vital signs and correlate with tissue perfusion in critically ill patients. This study aimed to assess the value of SI, MSI and ASI to predict mortality and the need for hospitalisation in all adult patients presenting to a district level emergency centre in South Africa.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This diagnostic study was performed as a retrospective observational study, using data from an existing electronic registry at a district level hospital emergency centre over a period of 24 months. All adult patients who presented to Mitchells Plain Hospital were eligible for inclusion. Sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios were calculated for each variable as a predictor of mortality and hospitalisation with pre-determined thresholds.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During the study period of 24 months, a total of 61 329 patients ≥ 18 years old presented to the EC with 60 599 included in the final sample. A red SATS triage category (+LR = 7.2) and SI ≥1.3 (+LR = 4.9) were the only two predictors with any significant clinical value. The same two markers performed well for both patients with and without trauma and specifically for patients who died while under the care of the emergency centre.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The study demonstrated that patients with a SI≥1.3 at triage have a significantly higher likelihood to die or require hospitalisation, whether the presenting complaint is trauma related or not, especially to predict mortality while under the care of the EC. Incorporating this marker as a triage alert could expedite the identification of patients requiring time critical interventions and improve patient throughput in the emergency centre.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48515,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/62/0a/main.PMC10562169.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211419X23000502","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Triage is the most important step in patients’ journey through an Emergency Centre (EC) and directly impacts time to critical actions. Triage tools, like the South African Triage Scale, are however not designed to predict patient outcomes. The shock index (SI), modified shock index (MSI) and age shock index (ASI) are clinical markers derived from vital signs and correlate with tissue perfusion in critically ill patients. This study aimed to assess the value of SI, MSI and ASI to predict mortality and the need for hospitalisation in all adult patients presenting to a district level emergency centre in South Africa.

Methods

This diagnostic study was performed as a retrospective observational study, using data from an existing electronic registry at a district level hospital emergency centre over a period of 24 months. All adult patients who presented to Mitchells Plain Hospital were eligible for inclusion. Sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios were calculated for each variable as a predictor of mortality and hospitalisation with pre-determined thresholds.

Results

During the study period of 24 months, a total of 61 329 patients ≥ 18 years old presented to the EC with 60 599 included in the final sample. A red SATS triage category (+LR = 7.2) and SI ≥1.3 (+LR = 4.9) were the only two predictors with any significant clinical value. The same two markers performed well for both patients with and without trauma and specifically for patients who died while under the care of the emergency centre.

Discussion

The study demonstrated that patients with a SI≥1.3 at triage have a significantly higher likelihood to die or require hospitalisation, whether the presenting complaint is trauma related or not, especially to predict mortality while under the care of the EC. Incorporating this marker as a triage alert could expedite the identification of patients requiring time critical interventions and improve patient throughput in the emergency centre.

Abstract Image

休克指数、改良休克指数和年龄休克指数对地区级急救中心死亡率和住院率的预测值。
简介:分流是患者通过急救中心(EC)过程中最重要的一步,直接影响关键行动的时间。然而,像南非分类量表这样的分类工具并不是用来预测患者结果的。休克指数(SI)、改良休克指数(MSI)和年龄休克指数(ASI)是源自生命体征的临床标志物,与危重患者的组织灌注相关。本研究旨在评估SI、MSI和ASI在预测南非地区级急救中心所有成年患者的死亡率和住院需求方面的价值,在24个月的时间内使用来自区级医院急诊中心现有电子登记处的数据。所有到Mitchells平原医院就诊的成年患者都有资格入选。通过预先确定的阈值,计算每个变量的敏感性、特异性和似然比,作为死亡率和住院率的预测指标。结果:在24个月的研究期间,共有61329名≥18岁的患者接受了EC检查,最终样本中包括60599人。红色SATS分诊类别(+LR=7.2)和SI≥1.3(+LR=4.9)是仅有的两个具有显著临床价值的预测因素。同样的两种标记物对有创伤和无创伤的患者都表现良好,特别是对在急救中心护理期间死亡的患者。讨论:该研究表明,无论主诉是否与创伤有关,在分诊时SI≥1.3的患者死亡或需要住院的可能性明显更高,尤其是在EC护理期间预测死亡率。将这一标记纳入分诊警报可以加快识别需要时间关键干预的患者,并提高急诊中心的患者吞吐量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
78
审稿时长
85 days
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信