Predictive Factors of Oxygen Therapy Failure in Patients with COVID-19 in the Emergency Department.

IF 1.5 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Open Access Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2023-10-04 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OAEM.S430600
Karn Suttapanit, Peeraya Lerdpaisarn, Pitsucha Sanguanwit, Praphaphorn Supatanakij
{"title":"Predictive Factors of Oxygen Therapy Failure in Patients with COVID-19 in the Emergency Department.","authors":"Karn Suttapanit,&nbsp;Peeraya Lerdpaisarn,&nbsp;Pitsucha Sanguanwit,&nbsp;Praphaphorn Supatanakij","doi":"10.2147/OAEM.S430600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia require oxygen therapy, including standard oxygen therapy and a high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), in the Emergency Department (ED), and some patients develop respiratory failure. In the COVID-19 pandemic, the intensive care unit (ICU) was overburdening. Therefore, prioritizing patients who require intensive care is important. This study aimed to find predictors and develop a model to predict patients at risk of requiring an invasive mechanical ventilator (IMV) in the ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective, single-center, observational study. Patients aged ≥18 years who were diagnosed with COVID-19 and required oxygen therapy in the ED were enrolled. Cox regression and Harrell's C-statistic were used to identifying predictors of requiring IMV. The predictive model was developed by calculated coefficients and the ventilator-free survival probability. The predictive model was internally validated using the bootstrapping method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 333 patients, and 97 (29.1%) had required IMV. Most 66 (68.0%) failure cases were initial oxygen therapy with HFNC. Respiratory rate-oxygenation (ROX) index, interleukin-6 (IL-6) concentrations ≥20 pg/mL, the SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) score without a respiratory score, and the patient's age were independent risk factors of requiring IMV. These factors were used to develop the predictive model. ROX index and the predictive model at 2 hours showed a good performance to predict oxygen therapy failure; the c-statistic was 0.814 (95% confidence level [CI] 0.767-0.861) and 0.901 (95% CI 0.873-0.928), respectively. ROX index ≤5.1 and the predictive model score ≥8 indicated a high probability of requiring IMV.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic was limited resources, ROX index, IL-6 ≥20 pg/mL, the SOFA score without a respiratory score, and the patient's age can be used to predict oxygen therapy failure. Moreover, the predictive model is good at discriminating patients at risk of requiring IMV and close monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":45096,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Emergency Medicine","volume":"15 ","pages":"355-365"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b0/8e/oaem-15-355.PMC10560766.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S430600","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Most patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia require oxygen therapy, including standard oxygen therapy and a high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), in the Emergency Department (ED), and some patients develop respiratory failure. In the COVID-19 pandemic, the intensive care unit (ICU) was overburdening. Therefore, prioritizing patients who require intensive care is important. This study aimed to find predictors and develop a model to predict patients at risk of requiring an invasive mechanical ventilator (IMV) in the ED.

Methods: We performed a retrospective, single-center, observational study. Patients aged ≥18 years who were diagnosed with COVID-19 and required oxygen therapy in the ED were enrolled. Cox regression and Harrell's C-statistic were used to identifying predictors of requiring IMV. The predictive model was developed by calculated coefficients and the ventilator-free survival probability. The predictive model was internally validated using the bootstrapping method.

Results: We enrolled 333 patients, and 97 (29.1%) had required IMV. Most 66 (68.0%) failure cases were initial oxygen therapy with HFNC. Respiratory rate-oxygenation (ROX) index, interleukin-6 (IL-6) concentrations ≥20 pg/mL, the SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) score without a respiratory score, and the patient's age were independent risk factors of requiring IMV. These factors were used to develop the predictive model. ROX index and the predictive model at 2 hours showed a good performance to predict oxygen therapy failure; the c-statistic was 0.814 (95% confidence level [CI] 0.767-0.861) and 0.901 (95% CI 0.873-0.928), respectively. ROX index ≤5.1 and the predictive model score ≥8 indicated a high probability of requiring IMV.

Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic was limited resources, ROX index, IL-6 ≥20 pg/mL, the SOFA score without a respiratory score, and the patient's age can be used to predict oxygen therapy failure. Moreover, the predictive model is good at discriminating patients at risk of requiring IMV and close monitoring.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

急诊科新冠肺炎患者氧疗失败的预测因素。
背景:大多数2019冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)肺炎患者需要在急诊科(ED)接受氧气治疗,包括标准氧气治疗和高流量鼻插管(HFNC),一些患者会出现呼吸衰竭。在新冠肺炎大流行期间,重症监护室(ICU)负担过重。因此,优先考虑需要重症监护的患者非常重要。本研究旨在寻找预测因素,并开发一个模型来预测ED中有需要有创机械通气机(IMV)风险的患者。方法:我们进行了一项回顾性、单中心、观察性研究。入选年龄≥18岁的诊断为新冠肺炎并需要在急诊室接受氧气治疗的患者。Cox回归和Harrell C统计量用于确定需要IMV的预测因素。通过计算系数和无呼吸机生存概率建立预测模型。使用自举方法对预测模型进行了内部验证。结果:我们招募了333名患者,其中97名(29.1%)需要IMV。大多数66例(68.0%)失败病例是HFNC的初始氧气治疗。呼吸速率氧合(ROX)指数、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)浓度≥20 pg/mL、无呼吸评分的SOFA(序贯器官衰竭评估)评分和患者年龄是需要IMV的独立危险因素。这些因素被用于开发预测模型。ROX指数和2小时预测模型在预测氧疗失败方面表现良好;c统计量分别为0.814(95%置信水平[CI]0.767-0.861)和0.901(95%CI 0.873-0.928)。ROX指数≤5.1,预测模型评分≥8表明需要IMV的概率较高。结论:新冠肺炎大流行资源有限,ROX指数、IL-6≥20pg/mL,SOFA评分无呼吸评分,患者年龄可用于预测氧疗失败。此外,该预测模型能够很好地区分有需要IMV和密切监测风险的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Access Emergency Medicine
Open Access Emergency Medicine EMERGENCY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
85
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信