Emotional Expressions Reconsidered: Challenges to Inferring Emotion From Human Facial Movements.

1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology
Lisa Feldman Barrett, Ralph Adolphs, Stacy Marsella, Aleix M Martinez, Seth D Pollak
{"title":"Emotional Expressions Reconsidered: Challenges to Inferring Emotion From Human Facial Movements.","authors":"Lisa Feldman Barrett, Ralph Adolphs, Stacy Marsella, Aleix M Martinez, Seth D Pollak","doi":"10.1177/1529100619832930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is commonly assumed that a person's emotional state can be readily inferred from his or her facial movements, typically called <i>emotional expressions</i> or <i>facial expressions</i>. This assumption influences legal judgments, policy decisions, national security protocols, and educational practices; guides the diagnosis and treatment of psychiatric illness, as well as the development of commercial applications; and pervades everyday social interactions as well as research in other scientific fields such as artificial intelligence, neuroscience, and computer vision. In this article, we survey examples of this widespread assumption, which we refer to as the <i>common view</i>, and we then examine the scientific evidence that tests this view, focusing on the six most popular emotion categories used by consumers of emotion research: anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and surprise. The available scientific evidence suggests that people do sometimes smile when happy, frown when sad, scowl when angry, and so on, as proposed by the common view, more than what would be expected by chance. Yet how people communicate anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and surprise varies substantially across cultures, situations, and even across people within a single situation. Furthermore, similar configurations of facial movements variably express instances of more than one emotion category. In fact, a given configuration of facial movements, such as a scowl, often communicates something other than an emotional state. Scientists agree that facial movements convey a range of information and are important for social communication, emotional or otherwise. But our review suggests an urgent need for research that examines how people <i>actually</i> move their faces to express emotions and other social information in the variety of contexts that make up everyday life, as well as careful study of the mechanisms by which people perceive instances of emotion in one another. We make specific research recommendations that will yield a more valid picture of how people move their faces to express emotions and how they infer emotional meaning from facial movements in situations of everyday life. This research is crucial to provide consumers of emotion research with the translational information they require.</p>","PeriodicalId":37882,"journal":{"name":"Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society","volume":"20 1","pages":"1-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6640856/pdf/nihms-1021596.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100619832930","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is commonly assumed that a person's emotional state can be readily inferred from his or her facial movements, typically called emotional expressions or facial expressions. This assumption influences legal judgments, policy decisions, national security protocols, and educational practices; guides the diagnosis and treatment of psychiatric illness, as well as the development of commercial applications; and pervades everyday social interactions as well as research in other scientific fields such as artificial intelligence, neuroscience, and computer vision. In this article, we survey examples of this widespread assumption, which we refer to as the common view, and we then examine the scientific evidence that tests this view, focusing on the six most popular emotion categories used by consumers of emotion research: anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and surprise. The available scientific evidence suggests that people do sometimes smile when happy, frown when sad, scowl when angry, and so on, as proposed by the common view, more than what would be expected by chance. Yet how people communicate anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and surprise varies substantially across cultures, situations, and even across people within a single situation. Furthermore, similar configurations of facial movements variably express instances of more than one emotion category. In fact, a given configuration of facial movements, such as a scowl, often communicates something other than an emotional state. Scientists agree that facial movements convey a range of information and are important for social communication, emotional or otherwise. But our review suggests an urgent need for research that examines how people actually move their faces to express emotions and other social information in the variety of contexts that make up everyday life, as well as careful study of the mechanisms by which people perceive instances of emotion in one another. We make specific research recommendations that will yield a more valid picture of how people move their faces to express emotions and how they infer emotional meaning from facial movements in situations of everyday life. This research is crucial to provide consumers of emotion research with the translational information they require.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

重新思考情感表达:从人类面部动作推断情感的挑战。
人们通常认为,一个人的情绪状态可以很容易地从他或她的面部动作中推断出来,通常称为情绪表情或面部表情。这种假设会影响法律判断、政策决定、国家安全协议和教育实践;指导精神疾病的诊断和治疗以及商业应用的开发;并渗透到日常社会互动以及人工智能、神经科学和计算机视觉等其他科学领域的研究中。在这篇文章中,我们调查了这一广泛假设的例子,我们称之为共同观点,然后我们检验了检验这一观点的科学证据,重点关注情绪研究消费者使用的六个最流行的情绪类别:愤怒、厌恶、恐惧、快乐、悲伤和惊讶。现有的科学证据表明,正如普遍观点所提出的那样,人们有时确实会在快乐时微笑,在悲伤时皱眉,在愤怒时皱眉,等等,这超出了人们的预期。然而,人们如何表达愤怒、厌恶、恐惧、快乐、悲伤和惊讶,在不同的文化、不同的情况下,甚至在同一种情况下,不同的人之间都有很大的差异。此外,面部运动的类似配置可变地表达了一个以上情绪类别的实例。事实上,一种特定的面部动作,比如皱眉,通常传达的不是情绪状态。科学家们一致认为,面部动作传达了一系列信息,对社交、情感或其他方面都很重要。但我们的综述表明,迫切需要研究人们在日常生活的各种背景下如何实际移动面部来表达情绪和其他社会信息,并仔细研究人们感知彼此情绪的机制。我们提出了具体的研究建议,这将更有效地了解人们在日常生活中如何移动面部来表达情绪,以及他们如何从面部移动中推断情绪含义。这项研究对于为情感研究的消费者提供他们所需的翻译信息至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
68.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Psychological Science in the Public Interest (PSPI) is a unique journal featuring comprehensive and compelling reviews of issues that are of direct relevance to the general public. These reviews are written by blue ribbon teams of specialists representing a range of viewpoints, and are intended to assess the current state-of-the-science with regard to the topic. Among other things, PSPI reports have challenged the validity of the Rorschach and other projective tests; have explored how to keep the aging brain sharp; and have documented problems with the current state of clinical psychology. PSPI reports are regularly featured in Scientific American Mind and are typically covered in a variety of other major media outlets.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信