Hiyam M Nadel, Nour Al-Sultan, Alex Berger, Paula McCree, Gaurdia Banister, Olivia Jung
{"title":"Mission possible: open innovation in nursing and patient care services at Massachusetts General Hospital.","authors":"Hiyam M Nadel, Nour Al-Sultan, Alex Berger, Paula McCree, Gaurdia Banister, Olivia Jung","doi":"10.1136/leader-2023-000777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Although front-line nurses and staff are uniquely positioned to identify the inefficiencies and gaps in care delivery, formal processes are not always in place to hear from those very employees.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We established a scalable process that embodies open innovation principles, to broaden and distribute the innovation locus.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.</p><p><strong>Particpitants: </strong>We invited 8800+ nurses and other direct caregivers to participate in organisational problem solving.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>We solicited employees to (1) identify pain points and develop solutions and (2) crowd vote to indicate which ideas they want to see implemented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>177 employees submitted 225 ideas, and 928 cast a vote. The 40 participants who submitted top-voted ideas were invited to develop a detailed implementation plan; of those, 27 submitted one. Four ideas emerged as winners.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Formulating a clear call for ideas, securing leadership buy-in and generating excitement about the process were essential to our efforts. Challenges associated with opening the innovation process involved managing a large volume of participants and submissions, and providing on-the-go training to nurses and staff who were not used to being asked to participate in organisational problem solving.</p>","PeriodicalId":36677,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Leader","volume":" ","pages":"162-166"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Leader","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2023-000777","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Although front-line nurses and staff are uniquely positioned to identify the inefficiencies and gaps in care delivery, formal processes are not always in place to hear from those very employees.
Design: We established a scalable process that embodies open innovation principles, to broaden and distribute the innovation locus.
Setting: Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Particpitants: We invited 8800+ nurses and other direct caregivers to participate in organisational problem solving.
Interventions: We solicited employees to (1) identify pain points and develop solutions and (2) crowd vote to indicate which ideas they want to see implemented.
Results: 177 employees submitted 225 ideas, and 928 cast a vote. The 40 participants who submitted top-voted ideas were invited to develop a detailed implementation plan; of those, 27 submitted one. Four ideas emerged as winners.
Conclusions: Formulating a clear call for ideas, securing leadership buy-in and generating excitement about the process were essential to our efforts. Challenges associated with opening the innovation process involved managing a large volume of participants and submissions, and providing on-the-go training to nurses and staff who were not used to being asked to participate in organisational problem solving.